it really is all in the wrist... writing. drawing. guitar. masturbating. et cetera...
h
Cosmic Funnies
Jules of Nature

izzy's playlists!
ojovivo
YOU ARE THE REASON

titsay
Three Goblin Art
todays bird

@theartofmadeline
KIROKAZE

Discoholic đȘ©

JVL
tumblr dot com
hello vonnie
No title available

â

oozey mess

Janaina Medeiros
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Hungary

seen from Malaysia
@nellie-the-toad
it really is all in the wrist... writing. drawing. guitar. masturbating. et cetera...
if youve ever heard of weird polycule drama u gotta understand its less 'poly people are bad partners' and more 'statistically if you have five girlfriends thats like 5x the likelyhood of one of your girlfriends doing something batshit" . like thats just basic math. rollin the dice. you hit the snake eyes buddy. sorry try again.
Statistically, what you're describing is actually the probability that at least one partner does something batshit. This can't be done by simply multiplying by the number of partners you have; if the probability is 10%, and you have 11 gfs, you'd get 110%, which doesn't make sense. What you need to do is use a cumulative binomial probability.
These are kind of annoying to calculate, so to avoid it, I'll use binomial manipulation wizardry to convert it to its equivalent: calculate the probability that all partners don't do something batshit, and take the complement
1 - (1-p)^N
where p is the probability of a single partner doing something batshit and N is the number of partners. Graphing different values for N and p (valid only for xâ„2)
However, this assumes that the drama is generated independently from a single person alone. If the drama is interpersonal, then it is dependent on the number of interactions, which increases as the square of the number of partners.
For simplicity, let's assume all interactions have the same probability of causing drama. The probability of at least one interaction causing drama is equivalent to the complement of no interactions causing drama.
1 - (1-p)^(N(N-1)/2)
At a 10% chance of conflict arising between any two people, with five partners, the probability of drama increases eightfold to 80%
To account for both single person and interpersonal drama, you can combine the two, with different values for p1 and p2, but the change as a result of p1 is small compared to p2, especially for p1<10%
1 - (1-p1)^N · (1-p2)^(N(N-1)/2)
#notably only fractionally dating someone can produce negative drama#this is the benefit in friends with benefits
the moments from vol 2 that are keeping my âstoncy could easily reunite in 5 years and get togetherâ delusions going:
jonathan talking about his and nancyâs shared trauma and saying âhow could anybody else understand?â (steve could)
nancy saying âsteve knows what he wants but i donâtâ (sounds exactly like something someone who canât pick between their two boyfriends would say)
nancy asking jonathan âgot anything else to confess?â mere seconds before steve literally bursts through the wall to save them (no explanation required but also. the parallels between this and steve bursting back into the byers house to save nancy and jonathan in s1)
it was a seven, the queerbaiting. it got me.
But why is Mike gay
hit show stranger things (2016) is my tammy thompson. she just doesn't love me back.
google what do i do if my special interest starts to fucking suck
donât want to start arguments in the tag because that is not what we need rn, but seriously i do think some of u guys are glazing the duffers way too much rn. claiming that they have a plan! that theyâre smart and theyâre lying! even if theyâre lying, even if theyâre holding out for byler in episode 8, this is all still so fucking evil. the coming out scene was still written horribly. letting us be bullied for years by homophobes, letting will suffer over and over just to get some âconsolationâ in getting to âexpose himselfâ to everyone and somehow thatâs the peak representation for your âoutcast showâ. the show where every straight couple gets to find strength in their love for each other but queer people only get to find strength in themselves.
pls wake the fuck up yall, get more haterpilled now
Sorcerer
flirting in the fields
happiest hes been in years
womenâs bodies werenât âmadeâ to do anything, nature didnât âintendâ anything, no human action is âunnaturalâ and there is no inherent âpurposeâ to a human life
people werenât designed to do anything because they werenât designed at all. Hope this helps đ€©
I've been slightly afraid of the possibility that birthdaygate wasn't real or even a possibility but then, rewatching Joyce's convo with Will about what she did the day he went missing and she mentions: "what kind of mother doesn't check her 11 years old son" when we KNOW and it's stated in his MISSING POST that he is 12 years old, i took it all back... SHE CAN'T EVEN MIX IT UP BECAUSE HIS BDAY WAS 8 MONTHS AGO??? nothing else makes sense besides it being on purpose, birthdaygate is so real, guys.
low opacity elrond
shout out to @/curioscurio for wonderful art:
"You never heard of knocking? Christ."
this is just DC fanart in disguise. we're never leaving the circus.
detail analysis + timelapse below
so remember that "what colour do you sketch in" post I reblogged a couple of days ago? That ... actually inspired me and I sketched something I'm happy with for the first time in forever - so thanks to whoever was responsible for that crossing my dash ^-^
"I'll cut your throat. That'll shut you up!" "You're beautiful..." -Princess Mononoke (1997)
timelapse + reference under the cut :D