Q: Do you think you receive more than you give or give more than you receive through community service?
A: Generally, I think it is difficult to compare giving and receiving. You give time, effort, sometimes money, which are all somewhat measurable, but what you receive is much less tangible. How do you assign a value to the satisfaction of knowing that you made a difference? How do you quantify the experience of seeing a segment of society that you couldn’t otherwise understand or sympathise with? You can’t, and so I think most people would not be able to give a good answer to this question.
That said, I would venture to say that there are more “lousy” or “normal” projects than meaningful ones, and so I think many people could fairly say that they have given more. To use an extreme example, flag day volunteers really don’t receive anything. How can they??
Therefore, personally, I would still say that I have given more, because I don’t feel like I’ve done that many genuinely meaningful projects. But I am open to the possibility that in my future I will be able to initiate and participate in meaningful projects because I will not have to fit them to my already-packed study/class timetable, and I will not be limited by what the school approves.
To me, it’s interesting to note that if what you’ve received is a genuine interest in the needs of your community, what you’ve received might lead you to give more. To cite a related non-community service example, I have been giving blood fairly regularly since starting University. I started partly out of curiosity, partly out of the knowledge that I was meeting a need, and partly just because I met all the eligibility requirements (because I eat too well oops). But what keeps me going back is the feeling of solidarity that comes from being part of a group of Singaporeans who care about our community, who see a need, and see that we can meet the need, and take action to meet the need.
I’m sure this phenomenon can also happen in the context of community service, but so far I’ve not experienced that. Or maybe I’m just too lazy to follow up.
Q: Is community service more about learning or serving?
A: It’s supposed to be both. They like to call it a “virtuous cycle”. As I wrote above, what you receive might lead you to give more. So, you serve, and in the course of doing so, what you learn enhances the way you serve.
This can happen because (1) you are inspired to give more, and so maybe you sign up to be a volunteer tutor for underprivileged kids after the project has officially come to an end (I did this once in my Secondary school days).
It can also happen because (2) you learn about the needs of the community you are serving, and are better able to serve because you change your methods.
That said, in reality I think most projects are too short-lived, and their structures too inflexible, for the participants to really be conscious of the relationship between learning and serving, which is why the common learning points people love to talk about are “I learnt about just how privileged we are to be living in Singapore! #gdll!! #csp #communityservice”. Not that it’s wrong, but I think it was really meant to be so much more. So most of the time it seems to be the case that community service is about serving. Go there, do your thing, and go home with your hours. Graduate looooo
Q:What were your motivations to carry out community service?
Transferrable skills/knowledge
For law students who do pro-bono volunteering, you can actually learn tangible skills through community service. For example, at some legal clinics, the student volunteers are allowed to interview the people who come in seeking legal aid. This trains you to identify legal issues, and gives you an opportunity to practice interview skills and etiquette.
“To whom much is given, much is required” – this is a pretty basic motivation, but can be unsustainable because it is often used to coerce. “Giving back” to society through community service shouldn’t feel obligatory because it can cause you to become calculative.
It is definitely emotionally gratifying to do community service; particularly, I think it’s very possible to develop a “hero complex” where you see yourself as the savior of the world because of your commitment to community service. But, a “better” form of motivation, imo, is when you genuinely appreciate that you have a part to play in creating a compassionate society, and you just want to act consistently with that understanding.
Experiential value - gaining perspective or experience
I don’t really know how to explain this point but there was a point in time where I had been doing a lot of “Corporate Law” and finance type of modules, dealing with rich property owners and their banks, evil corporations, bonds, debentures, etc etc and I just thought to myself: “I want to encounter real legal problems that the average person would actually be concerned with, and not just the legal issues of faceless corporations”. So I signed up for 10 weekly sessions of volunteering at the family division of the state courts, helping to explain legal processes to divorced/divorcing couples.
Q: Do you think community service records play a role on your resume?
A: Yes. It depends on your employer, but these days it seems like community service records don’t make you stand out at all; it’s more like, if you don’t have any, then you will be outstanding for the wrong reasons. So I have actually made it a point to make sure that my projects are registered by the school, even though I’ve cleared my minimum of 80 hours, because I want to be able to say in job interviews (and on other occasions) that I have surpassed the minimum.
Q: Do you think your upbringing has a role to play in your attitude towards community service?
A: Yes. But I think in our parents’ generation there was perhaps less volunteerism as a whole? So the particular aspects of upbringing that would be relevant to someone’s attitude toward community service would be more indirect. For example, your parents telling you things like “if you don’t work hard you will end up like that road sweeper” can give you an overly meritocratic, elitist attitude that is predisposed against community service.