Student Thinking in Science Curriculum Design
A short video essay provides examples of how nVizn Ideas' science curriculum design incorporates the use of student thinking to ensure learning of the correct ideas.
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
YOU ARE THE REASON

Product Placement
Claire Keane
Stranger Things
cherry valley forever

Love Begins

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Sweet Seals For You, Always
almost home
Sade Olutola
tumblr dot com
Misplaced Lens Cap
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Liechtenstein

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France
@nvizn-ideas
Student Thinking in Science Curriculum Design
A short video essay provides examples of how nVizn Ideas' science curriculum design incorporates the use of student thinking to ensure learning of the correct ideas.
So what does a mixtape have to do with education? Not much except it provides an easy-to-understand analogy for changing the way we think about how technology can deliver on the promise of transforming science education. Let your mind drift back to the mixtape days of the 1970s & 80s.
It is common to hear people proclaim the need to improve education. Yet articulating what that looks like is difficult. The various silver bullets often suggested (charter schools, higher teacher pay, dismantling teacher unions, etc.) are not really silver bullets. If they were, it would be evident in the research & it is not.Â
What needs to change is the curriculum – what students mentally engage with in their classrooms every day of the school year. Are students memorizing vocabulary words, coloring pictures & enduring endless rounds of drill & practice? Or are they grappling with high-level ideas, asking questions, solving problems, experiencing and gathering evidence about the universe?
Today, when even smaller firms can operate in multiple segments of the industry, there are multiple fronts where disruptors may be coming for your lunch or where new vendors may be coming for your incumbents.
While this article focuses on Fintech, the very same article could be written for Edtech. Disruption begins with a problem - not with technology. The problem in education is not that there is not enough technology; the problem is that the technology is being used to deliver the same failed curriculum as always. Using gamification & collecting badges to memorize vocabulary words or practice multiplication tables means that students are still MEMORIZING vocabulary words and multiplication tables - the epitome of low-level thinking. The only way to improve education is to change the curriculum - what students engage with for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, 180 days per year.  That’s how education is disrupted. Want to see the difference? Ask me.
Activities to TEACH a Standard VS. Activities ABOUT a Topic
By: Brent A. FordÂ
One of the big problems with teaching science to young students is that many curricula, or activities suggested to teachers as great for teaching fill in the blank, are often just activities ABOUT a topic instead of lessons designed to TEACH a standard.  Let’s clarify this extremely important distinction.
A standard is the articulation of an idea, or a skill, that explicitly defines what it is that students should know or be able to do. For example, students should be able to skip count by 5s, 10s, and 100s - that’s a skill from the grade 2 mathematics standards; or students should understand that sound can make matter vibrate and vibrating matter can make sound – that’s a concept from the grade 1 science standards. Lessons designed to teach this science standard will look quite different from activities that are just about sound. (Examples to follow.)
Designing lessons to teach a science standard typically requires an even further division of the standard into sub-components of knowledge and experiences required to ensure students learn all aspects of the idea. Such a division might include, but would not be limited to, the following ideas:
If I hear a sound, then something must be vibrating;
If I can make something vibrate, then it should produce a sound that I can hear; and
If I can stop the vibrations from something that is making a sound, then the sound should stop.
This level of detail makes clear the range of experiences and observations students need to gain mastery of the content.
To further delineate the distinction between activities to teach a standard versus activities about a topic, let’s look at several examples. The first three are classic activities about sound. Activities like these are ubiquitous on the internet and common in many curricular materials. And while students may have fun doing these activities and think they are “doing science,” their opportunity to learn the standard outlined above is essentially non-existent. (The inclusion of these videos in this discussion should not be construed as criticism of the individuals nor their respective organizations. The videos were not presented as an entire teaching unit, but rather cool activities to help students learn about sound.)
Moaning Balloons - Spinning a hex nut inside a balloon does produce a very cool sound, but how does this activity teach or reinforce the idea that something is vibrating? What’s vibrating….the balloon or the nut? How can a young student tell what’s vibrating? What’s their evidence? Same questions related to swinging the tube around! What’s the evidence students can point to in saying that something is vibrating? Also, students at this age – concrete thinkers – do not have the mental capacity to think about air molecules, much less air molecules vibrating. (Not sure if she said centripetal or centrifugal force. There’s no such thing as centrifugal force – but regardless, let’s not bring force and motion ideas into a lesson trying to teach the first grade sound standard.)
Cup & Bucket Sounds - Using a damp cloth to pull on a string attached to an inverted cup also produces an interesting sound. But again, what’s vibrating -the string - the cup? What can students point to that provides evidence of a vibration? (By the way, let’s not bring friction into any lesson for first graders; friction is difficult enough for middle and high school students and is well beyond the understanding of very young students.)
Secret Sound -Banging a coat hanger into the wall with strings attached to fingers next to your ears also produces a cool sound. But again, what’s the evidence to support an understanding of the relationship between vibration and sound?
Contrast these videos with the following sequence of observations and experiences designed to allow students to build an understanding of the relationship between sound and vibration.
Place your hand on your throat like this:
Blow. What do you hear? What do you feel? You can probably hear your breath, but very little sound and you don’t really feel anything in your fingers.
Now, place your hand on your throat again. Hum, speak, sing or yell. What do you hear? What do you feel? You certainly hear a sound and now you feel something happening in your throat. There’s a difference in the way your throat feels when you make a sound and that difference provides one piece of evidence about the relationship between sound and vibration.
While feeling the vibration in the throat provides some evidence, students can’t see anything vibrating. We should go further to help students visualize this relationship. A next step might include taking a rubber band stretched between two chairs, across a box, or around some drawer pulls. What happens when you pluck the rubber band?
You hear a sound and now you can see the rubber band vibrating (moving back and forth). Â
Now put your hand on the rubber band to make it stop moving (vibrating). What happens? The sound stops. The student is experiencing more evidence about the relationship between sound and vibration: if I pluck the rubber band, I can see it vibrating and I can hear a sound; and when I stop the rubber band from vibrating, the sound stops.
How about another one? Place a meter stick (yard stick) on a flat surface (table or counter) letting one end hang out over the end of the table or counter. Use your hand, or a heavy book, to hold the other end tight against the table. Pluck the meter stick.
You hear a sound and you can see the meter stick vibrating. Put your hand on the meter stick; you stop the vibration and you stop the sound.
A complete unit designed to teach the standard would not necessarily stop at this point. But it should be clear that these three simple activities are much more likely to help students develop an understanding of the standard than the moaning balloon, bucket and string or coat hanger activities.
It is imperative that the science curriculum, and in turn teachers, provide students with activities and experiences that allow them an opportunity to learn the standard not just play with activities about a topic.
If you create an interactive book featuring sounds from eastern US, seems logical to create one for western US. Voila! Learn yourself & #share that sense of wonder with a #child!
The iBook version embeds the interactivity directly into the book. The print version uses QR Codes & our #free app to extend the fun & learning.
iBook from:Â https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/more-sounds-of-the-night/id1458518134?ls=1&mt=11
Print book from:Â https://www.amazon.com/More-Sounds-Night-Interactive-Learning/dp/1947348760
Download #app from:
https://itunes.apple.com/…/qr-code-reader-nvizn/id1437306698
OR
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details…
#edtech
#stem
#kidlit
#readtoyourchildren
#interactive
#science education
#curriculum
#soundsofthenight
#innovation
#readtogether
Attention to Student Thinking
By: Brent A. FordÂ
When queried about volcanoes, earthquakes and mountain ranges, students rarely offered the response “I don’t know,” instead suggesting answers ranging from partially correct to wildly imaginative and completely fabricated. Knowing what incorrect (or naive) ideas students bring to the classroom, and why they might have such ideas, is important to ensure that teachers help students replace those incorrect ideas with correct ones. This article provides examples from a middle-school unit on plate tectonics, but its focus can be employed in all types of teaching.
Click to read the full article.
Ever wonder about those nighttime sounds we all enjoy on those summer evenings? Learn yourself and share your wonder with a child!
Our newest #interactive #childrensbooks out today in #print and #iBook formats. The iBook version embeds the interactivity directly into the book. The print version uses QR Codes & our #free app to extend the fun & learning.
iBook from: https://itunes.apple.com/…/book/sounds-of-the-…/id1449655364
Print book from: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1947348744
Download #app from:
https://itunes.apple.com/…/qr-code-reader-nvizn/id1437306698
OR
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details…
The US currently ranks 24th out of 71 countries in K-12 science achievement …. a position that has not changed in many, many years. There is a cost to being 24th. Watch this short video to learn more about the cost of complacency and what changes need to be made to address this critical problem.
Cost of Complacency
The US currently ranks 24th out of 71 countries in science....a position that hasn't changed in 35 years. There is a cost to being 24th. Let the stats below sink in.......Improvement requires a better curriculum! https://nviznideas.com/users/home/
Evidence: A Basis for Teaching Science to Young Children
By: Brent A. Ford
The approach toward science in schools has often been from one of simply learning “facts” and teachers thinking they needed to be able to “explain” scientific facts to children. It’s no wonder so little science is taught in schools, especially elementary schools.  But science is not simply learning facts; it is building an understanding and a way of thinking based on observation and evidence.
For centuries, people made observations about our world and then tried to gather evidence to explain those observations.  Take the example of the movement of the sun across the sky. What phenomenon has been more prevalent and important in the daily lives of humans for thousands of years than the sun’s rising each morning and setting each evening?  To anyone who simply stands and looks up at the sky, there is no sensation of movement and everything in the sky rises in the east and sets in the west. Therefore everything must revolve around Earth; that’s a perfectly reasonable explanation based on such evidence.
Sunrise, Aukland, New Zealand
Sunset, London, England
But over time, scientists noticed evidence that didn’t fit the Earth-centric explanation – Sun rise and moon rise change over the course of the year; some planets don’t appear for months at a time; some planets appear to move in a reverse direction against the background of stars. Such evidence, along with much more, led to our current understanding of Earth’s place with our solar system and our solar system’s place within the larger universe.Â
If teachers embrace this way of thinking and teaching, then science quickly moves away from an often ignored chore to an engaging and compelling experience for both students and teacher.
A wonderful aspect to introducing primary students to science is that, for the most part, the concepts we want students to learn and experience are relatively simple ideas (but form the basis for further study as students mature). One national science standard for primary students is:
Sound can make matter vibrate, and vibrating matter can make sound.
For students to be able to grapple with this idea, they need appropriately designed observations that in turn allow them to gather evidence to build the explanation that:
if I hear a sound, then something must be vibrating;
if I can make something vibrate, then it should produce a sound I can hear; andÂ
if I can stop the vibrations from something that is making a sound, then the sound should stop.
That’s it - there is nothing more at this age that we can expect students to really understand. Their minds are not ready for sound waves and air molecules and ear drums and nerve cells within the ear. Students will get to all of that in due time, but at such an early age the focus is on simple ideas and helping them develop the thinking skills centered on using evidence to explain observations.
The experiences, and therefore the evidence, need not be complicated. Students often are asked to think about a number of observations that they have undoubtedly made many times before. Â But by systematically selecting observations and experiences, students build not only their ability to explain observations, but their ability to think logically, critically and to problem-solve.
Will students be able to think up their own explanations?  Probably, but some may be reluctant to offer them until they are comfortable with this method of teaching science.  If they become stumped, teachers should think out loud to “model” the thought process.
A large part of thinking through this kind of problem is visualizing what’s happening.  Therefore, drawings are very important.  Students need to become comfortable with the skill of visualizing processes in their minds and sharing them in ways that others can understand their thinking.
It is tremendously important to ask students to construct their own understanding from the evidence (even if it requires some verbal thinking by the teacher).  This is essential to students’ long-term learning, and to their development of skills in problem-solving and scientific reasoning. (If we simply tell them the answers, they may be able to answer test questions in a few days, but they are unlikely to retain the learning for a significant length of time.  Nor will they have the opportunity to practice the thinking skills that they will eventually need in the world they will enter as adults.) Do not, however, leave their knowledge-construction to chance.  The learning experiences contained within all of the units are designed to reach a goal and teachers need to ensure that it gets there.
Lastly, teachers must be ever vigilant to those incorrect, incomplete or naive ideas that students invariably bring with them to class. Â Please access those related resources for support.
Read the 5-star review from @RealisticPoetry! "Priceless Beauty on Earth" #poetry #children #Amazon #iBook #readtogether #STEM #curriculum  Click here for review.
Thanks @NSFSBIR for this program! We just applied for funding for the development of technologies to support our #curriculum aimed at delivering increased #student #achievement in #science. #Fingerscrossed #STEM
We presented at NYC Summit - great event - great organization!Â
 #NEVS17 where #startups connect with #AwesomeVCs & #Angels. $100 off the current rates http://bit.ly/2B6Fe9Q  Code: NVIZNVIP
Our intuitive theories about how the world works are often wrong (and hard to shake). Steven Poole reviews “Scienceblind” by Andrew Shtulman.
If #science #edtech does not address this important issue, then #studentachievement will not improve. #curriculummatters #STEM
#Edtech must enhance student achievement & learning - not just preserve an unacceptable status quo. #STEM #curriculum
#Edtech cannot solve this problem without significant improvement in science curricula. #scienceeducation See the evidence: www.nviznideas.com/mission/
Read a free sample or buy A World of Wonder by Brent A. Ford & Lucy McCullough Hazlehurst. You can read this book with iBooks on your iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, or Mac.
FANTASTIC #INTERACTIVE EXPERIENCE
A World of Wonder Brent A. Ford & Lucy McCullough Hazlehurst
This book is available for download with #iBooks on your Mac or iOS device.
A World of Wonder is an interactive book designed to help children develop a wonder for, and an appreciation of, the world in which we all live. The book combines spectacular images with a variety of poetry and verse…from time-honored and classic to new and sometimes humorous.  The book includes links to activities, videos and experiments to extend and enhance the learning. For example, a cute poem about the International Space Station seen as a twinkling star, followed by a beautiful image of the Station and then a link to more information about how to spot the space station as it flies overhead.
This is not the type of book typically read in one session. We encourage you to use the Image Index to come and go as children ask questions about the world. Children can certainly experience the book on their own, but we also encourage parents and teachers to engage with children - ask questions to tease out their understanding of the world and provide guidance where and when it seems appropriate. We also encourage you to follow children’s leads to encourage their interests in our magnificent world.
The authors, both educators and researchers with many years of experience, ensure that each facet of the experience is scientifically and pedagogically appropriate for young children.
GRAB YOUR COPY NOW…
ALSO AVAILABLE ON AMAZON: http://amzn.to/2xLV9dZ