Sugar in western diets increases risk for breast cancer tumors and metastasis
http://www.sciencecodex.com/sugar_in_western_diets_increases_risk_for_breast_cancer_tumors_and_metastasis-172627 -- Pseudoscience
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

shark vs the universe

pixel skylines

⁂
macklin celebrini has autism

@theartofmadeline

Product Placement
Game of Thrones Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always
RMH
No title available
todays bird
Noah Kahan
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
h

JVL
untitled
Peter Solarz
ojovivo

Discoholic 🪩
seen from United States
seen from Peru
seen from Pakistan

seen from United States

seen from Brunei
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@padre953
Sugar in western diets increases risk for breast cancer tumors and metastasis
http://www.sciencecodex.com/sugar_in_western_diets_increases_risk_for_breast_cancer_tumors_and_metastasis-172627 -- Pseudoscience
Clinical research experts comment on the state of their fields
http://www.sciencecodex.com/clinical_research_experts_comment_on_the_state_of_their_fields-172575
Cholesterol Treatment Gets Complicated
This isn't a surprise. Without real science of salt everything gets complicated.
Ignatius Brady: http://www.science20.com/deconstructing_obesity/cholesterol_treatment_gets_complicated-162640
And: Ignatius Brady: What Is Fat For? Re-Thinking Obesity Science File Size: 968 KB Print Length: 163 pages Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited Publisher: Ignatius Brady (December 5, 2015) Publication Date: December 5, 2015
http://www.amazon.com/What-Fat-Re-Thinking-Obesity-Science-ebook/dp/B0190W3O7Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1451182714&sr=8-1&keywords=what+is+fat+for
Unfortunately, obesity science does not exist. Exist only pseudoscience, and this book is a part of the big heap of junk. But is a good business.
As we consider the ethics of human gene editing, we need to understand what can and can't be meaningfully edited.
For example:Yamawaki N, Yamada M, Kan-no T, Kojima T, Kaneko T, Yonekubo A.: Macronutrient, mineral and trace element composition of breast milk from Japanese women. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;...
The sodium content of the colostrum is significantly higher than mature human milk. Obviously this has an evolutionary explanation. What is this?
My question only partly scientific, dared mainly moral problem the real science of salt. For details read my rapid response on BMJ online; Re: The scientific report guiding the US dietary...
Type 2 Diabetes In Kids – New Test Helps Zero In On Solutions
http://acsh.org/2015/11/type-2-diabetes-in-kids-new-test-helps-zero-in-on-solutions/ "Just over a decade ago researchers in the United Kingdom published findings about four white adolescents (three females, one male, ages 13-15) presenting with significant obesity and Type 2 diabetes. The authors offered a cautionary prediction that this clinical presentation – type 2 diabetes was rare in childhood – would become more common. And it has. According to the National Diabetes Statistics Report released in 2014, approximately 208,000 Americans under the age of 20 have been diagnosed with diabetes. What was once a rare scenario has become so prevalent that the condition is at the center of two recent major clinical trials. The Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Youth study (TODAY) published their first results in 2012. The randomized controlled trial comprised 699 adolescents and was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of three treatment options: metformin alone, metformin plus rosiglitazone, or metformin plus intensive lifestyle changes aimed to reduce weight and increase physical activity. Metformin and rosiglitazone were already shown to be safe and effective for treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults, but outcomes in a younger population had not been studied. The TODAY study found that durable glycemic control with metformin alone was achieved in half of the 10-17 age group studied. However, in combination with rosiglitazone there was improvement in both glucose control and side effect profile. The TODAY study led to more questions, such as whether or not it could be determined early in the disease course which adolescents would not achieve durable glycemic control with metformin. They compared two groups: those who maintained glycemic control for at least 48 months and those who lost it prior to 48 months. The authors found that those with an HbA1c greater than 6.3 percent after being treated for three months with metformin had a fourfold increased risk of losing glycemic control. The median time for loss of glycemic control was found to be 11 months. HbA1c, which gives a quantitative value of glycosylated hemoglobin, is commonly used to monitor glucose control in diabetics over three month periods. Interestingly, a value greater than 6.5 percent is considered diagnostic of diabetes mellitus. The researchers suggest that applying this cutoff value in clinical practice will allow for the identification of two different groups requiring two different modes of treatment. Physicians could identify early on in the disease course those who will require more intensive or additional forms of therapy. And on the other end of the spectrum, for those below the cut off value, unnecessary and/or aggressive therapeutic interventions could be avoided." http://adc.bmj.com/content/86/3/207.full http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/ http://acsh.org/2015/11/type-2-diabetes-in-kids-new-test-helps-zero-in-on-solutions/ http://acsh.org/category/medical-and-pharma/ http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2015/10/06/dc15-0848
New study suggests more than 8 percent of children with cancer have genetic predisposition
http://www.sciencecodex.com/new_study_suggests_more_than_8_percent_of_children_with_cancer_have_genetic_predisposition-170118
Even we nourish the entropy in our every cell. http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4962/rr-5
Why do children develop cancer?
http://www.sciencecodex.com/why_do_children_develop_cancer-170119
Critical gaps in antenatal care identified in cases of term stillbirths
http://www.sciencecodex.com/critical_gaps_in_antenatal_care_identified_in_cases_of_term_stillbirths-170120
We must feed ourselves according to maximum economy principle – but not the disorder – in our every cells. The maximum economy principle can be found in the composition of human milk, which is an evolutionary perfect food for babies (from every viewpoint). Naturally, the composition of the human milk is the perfect guide for adult nutrition (sodium/potassium ratio, ratio between sum of alkaline metals and sum of polyvalent metals, ratio between metals and energy content, etc.). The unnecessary sodium salts increase the incidence of every illnesses without any exception! The evidences: In the scientific literature & media the salt has political- & a lot of pseudoscience but real science of salt we can find only in traces because it’s really CENSORED globally. It’s time to understand, teach & use some very important but forgotten & ignored knowledge; fundamental natural laws/facts & to see the sad reality. The spontaneous diffusion of Na ions into the cells & the diffusion of K ions out of the cells continuously enhance the entropy (disorder). The task of the Na/K pumps to keep constant the intracellular concentration of Na & K ions. These cellular pumps continuously use energy (ATP). Excess Na intake = excess diffusion = excess increase of entropy = excess work for pumps = excess energy expenditure against excess entropy > excess food consumption. But all the rest of our vital processes (functional processes of the cells) receive less energy because our capacity (to make energy from foods) is limited (Kleiber's law). Everything work worse in our body & this increases the incidence of all illnesses without any exception, our aging & devolution accelerate etc., this is why Na-salts are perfect foods of entropy. 10th ed. of RDA was the best recommendation ever, 500 mg/day Na! Sugars & fats are foods & are sources of energy. But entropy & Na intakes = five decades global censorship, corruption, pseudoscience & lack of real science. Excess Na intake significantly enhances the excess diffusion (excess entropy) because the surface (billions) of cells is extreme large, this is the main risk factor of diabetes 1-2, overweight, NCDs etc. & our devolution is a considerable fact too. The law of entropy is the fiercest enemy of life & is our fiercest enemy too. NaCl isn’t food for humans but is perfect food of entropy. Every mmol excess Na & the wrong Na/K ratio & other wrong ratios increase more the entropy in our every cell, but the specialists talk about these rarely or NEVER. Excess Na intake doesn’t increase the oxidative pathway, but a critical surplus switches the anaerobic glycolysis on, in our every cell & we produce cytotoxic lactic acid. This is the Sodium-Induced Cellular Anaerobic Glycolysis (Osaka et al. 2001., but the article was censored). All of our vital processes & organs work worse (heart, brain, regulating systems, immune system etc.) & our cells are dying. We haven’t enough energy & enough time for the regeneration because we enhance the entropy in our every cell, day by day, again & again. The average lifetime of our cells shortens. Faster the telomeres run out. Our aging accelerates. We get sick often & we will die soon. Logical consequence: the unnecessary salt increases the incidence of all illnesses without any exception! This is the no named Sodium-Induced Disorder Syndrome. The entropy law finds our weak point or points & ravages mainly there, but increases the disorder in every cell in our body. We are no uniform, so other risk factors & circumstances affect the individual consequences. The growing entropy is our number one public enemy on every level; physical & mental health & social level globally. The evolution of life on Earth, our history & our entire individual life is a continuous war against entropy. But we, humans started our devolution = the entropy is growing in human genome. Even we nourish the entropy in our every cell (fundamentals of our existence) but the health scientists don’t talk & write about this. This is really a fatal error. Non-communicable knowledge is too much in salt science, it’s time to change that, because we will die out within 250 years! “The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) in 1978 petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to revoke the generally recognized as safe status and limit salt, … It is unfortunate that government health authorities have not shown the will to act.” Source: http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v71/n1/full/5001951a.html But the CSPI is weak, because they don’t use the already existing knowledge. This is awesome guilty irresponsibility &/or astonishing ignorance. Optimal ratios & quantities are in human milk. From every viewpoint the human milk is an evolutionary perfect food, including minimal energy expenditure of the Na/K pump & kidney of babies = possible minimum „entropy-transfer” into babies = healthy growing with maximal economy. So, the human milk is perfect guide to calculate optimal adult intakes. But the scientists ignore these facts. The health sciences made experimental animals from the humanity. The entropy is nourished in us with Na-salts, but they don’t talk & write about this. They are treating only the symptoms & consequences of the Sodium-Induced Disorder. Without real salt science – evidence based medicine & really preventive medicine doesn’t exist. Sodium recommendation is bad, education is astonishingly bad, the strategy against obesity, NCDs etc. is bad. True science of salt exists only in traces in the scientific literature, & in some articles even the traces are concealed & censored. In my article on science20 I collected the most important evidences (near 70 references) of the above ones: http://www.science20.com/entropy_and_sodium_intakes_wicked_problems_health_sciences-120016 And read my comment to 2015 Dietary Guidelines (Submitted 03/11/2015): http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2015/comments/readCommentDetails.aspx?CID=3982 and this: http://horizon-magazine.eu/article/science-common-language-commissioner-moedas_en.html#comment-1945038947 Some references of the ignored and censored real (and not political and not pseudo!) science of salt: Klahr and Bricker: Energetics of Anaerobic Sodium Transport by the Fresh Water Turtle Bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1965 March 1; 48(4): 571-80 http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2195440/pdf/571.pdf De Luise et al.: Reduced activity of the red-cell sodium-potassium pump in human obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine 1980 Oct 30; 303(18): 1017-22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198010303031801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6252462 Henningsen N.C.: The sodium pump and energy regulation: some new aspects for essential hypertension, diabetes II and severe overweight. Klinische Wochenschrift 63 Suppl 3:4-8. 1985. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2582182 Sandor Z.: Equivalency law in the metal requirement of the living organisms. Acta Alimentaria 27 (4): 389-395. 1998. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/262067162 Abstract: From information referring to metal requirements of the human organism as well as metal contents of human and cow`s milk and cereal grains it was concluded that an Equivalency Law exists in the metal balance of the living organisms. According to this law the alkali metal requirement (mainly potassium and sodium) is chemically equivalent with that of polyvalent metals (namely calcium, magnesium, zinc, iron etc.). Theoretical considerations are given for proving the existence of the Equivalency Law. Very important note: This equivalency law is a perfect example of the maximum economy principle in biology (but it's ignored). Osaka et al.: Thermogenesis induced by osmotic stimulation of the intestines in the rat. J Physiol. 2001 April 1; 532(Pt 1): 261–269. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2278526/ (Note: This is very valuable work, but was censored.) Yamawaki et al.: Macronutrient, mineral and trace element composition of breast milk from Japanese women. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005; 19(2-3): 171-81. Epub 2005 Oct 24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16325533 Kleinewietfeld et al.: Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells Nature 2013 doi:10.1038/nature11868 Published online 06 March 2013 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11868.html And read this: Gary Taubes: The (Political) Science of Salt, Science 14 August 1998: Vol. 281 no. 5379 pp. 898-907 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/281/5379/898.full http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/users/rice/Stat2/salt.html But Taubes did not find the real nutrition science under 16 years: Why Nutrition Is So Confusing. By Gary Taubes Feb. 8, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/opinion/sunday/why-nutrition-is-so-confusing.html From this: "Meanwhile, the research literature on obesity has also ballooned. In 1960, fewer than 1,100 articles were published on obesity or diabetes in the indexed medical literature. Last year it was more than 44,000. In total, over 600,000 articles have been published purporting to convey some meaningful information on these conditions. It would be nice to think that this deluge of research has brought clarity to the issue. The trend data argue otherwise. ... Everyone has a theory. The evidence doesn’t exist to say unequivocally who’s wrong." But this is ignorant stupidity. Don't need theory. Stone-hard evidence exist, but it's ignored and censored globally. The resurrection of the real science of salt will be a fantastic historical moment for the prevention of every diseases. But without resurrection - the carnival is over.
Inflammatory response may fan the flame of dietary fats' role in obesity-related diseases
http://www.sciencecodex.com/inflammatory_response_may_fan_the_flame_of_dietary_fats_role_in_obesityrelated_diseases-165669
The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: is it scientific?
Nina Teicholz, journalist, New York City, USA The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: is it scientific? BMJ 2015; 351 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4962 (Published 23 September 2015) My comment: http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4962/rr-5
Megszakítjuk adásunkat: Zürichben éppen most mentik meg az anyatejkutatás multidiszciplinaritását
http://index.hu/tudomany/egeszseg/2015/07/07/megszakitjuk_adasunkat_zurichben_eppen_most_mentik_meg_az_anyatejkutatas_multidiszciplinaritasat/ -- http://www.mediadesk.uzh.ch/articles/2015/familie-larsson-rosenquist-stiftung-finanziert-weltweit-ersten-lehrstuhl-fuer-muttermilchforschung_en.html -- http://www.uzh.ch/index.html -- https://www.facebook.com/uzh.ch
New Study Challenges The Carbohydrate Hypothesis
http://www.science20.com/deconstructing_obesity/new_study_challenges_the_carbohydrate_hypothesis-156869 The original article: http://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/abstract/S1550-4131(15)00350-2 -- The Carbohydrate Hypothesis http://www.science20.com/deconstructing_obesity/the_carbohydrate_hypothesis-156489