Color Me Curious

if i look back, i am lost
Show & Tell

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Game of Thrones Daily
NASA

#extradirty
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Product Placement
★
Phantogram Three
occasionally subtle
KIROKAZE
No title available
sheepfilms
macklin celebrini has autism
🪼
ojovivo
h
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from France
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ukraine

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from United States
@paul-jaisini-art
stars gold moon jaisini sticker 9 mg rev
INVISIBLE
(via jaisini)
every man thinks God is on his side
the rich and powerful know that he is
Time Squared Jaisini
justice for sale!!! up to 70% off!!!
Picnic at a Sideway
Oil on linen
Signed
W x H (“) 36 x 36
Das Ich Und Das Es Series
The images of “Picnic at a Sideway” are set in undefined spatial dimension.
A scene of the artist’s favored theme of love triangle newly interpreted in
another painting. An enraged troll can’t take a view of a brutally strong
man with a lustful woman. He had cut off his own genitals, as an atavistic
mental non-logical response to his arousal. An overall light blue color of this
work gives a melancholic overtone to the theme of Epicurean pleasure. This
shimmering color of heated aquamarine does not cause a cold effect together
with the amethyst casts, but creates a feeling of heated air that melts passion
and blends objects into the environment. The work’s title focuses on a festive
mood. “Picnic…” bridges with a remote work such as “the Peasant Dance”
by Pieter Brueghel, which depicts dancing, drinking, kissing, and pissing
peasants. In “Picnic,” the image of the grim troll is akin of the Brueghel’s
peasants with distorted complexion, with their heads buried in their hats,
creatures of the own instincts and base desires.
Separated by centuries, both artists might have been of similar minds about
their subject, that could have been the ideas of shared humanity, sinnery, and
joys that tied people together. The art of Jaisini brings line and form, color
and composition, concept and style into a tense and engaging balance.
That complex principle proposes a reinvention of figuration, which is not
figural, but is itself a fabric of an abstraction. The current return of artists to
painting can only be successful with their ability to work in the media of
painting. Paul Jaisini’s paintings from “Das Ich und Das Es” series
demonstrate the artist’s inspirational ability to create in his media with rear
mastery of brush work.
“The aim of my work has always been to arouse in my audience a visual
experience followed by understanding, followed by feelings. The priority of
impression can vary; it’s a never-ending Game.
PINOCCHIO
Oil on linen
Signed
W x H (“) 48 x 48
Early Period
Jaisini, an artist of a new time and age, looks at the traditional art concerns
of good and evil in a wider perspective. As we all know, this used to be a
standard Biblical subject for the artist’s exploration of the two sides of
human nature. In Pinocchio, Jaisini introduces the performance of late
modern critical nature. It is a moralizing representation, which is open to
interpretation. Little in Jaisini’s art is straightforward representation.
Most elements are open to variety of interpretations, though a presence of
devil in Pinocchio brings us closer to the original concern.
In art history it’s known in the art works of medieval times, especially in the
paintings of Bosch, devils appear among people during their ordinary
working lives. It epitomized the medieval belief in the real unseen existence
of demons and devils everywhere. For Jaisini it may be a simplest message
of the ever-present antagonist to the human corrupt nature. The pictorial
language of the artist is based on his search for the unusual associations.
Here, Jaisini has produced a remarkably dramatic evocation of a turmoil at
the party table. The idea of Pinocchio may be the Bosch’s type illustration of
the body prevalence over spirit. Jaisini does not show tormenting but a more
contemporary kind of punishment as a birth of a black child with a knife. His
white mother is covered with table cum-stained cloth.
When the true image of the childbirth is revealed, the shock tactic invades
the space. The orgy itself, the table and under the table seem like a replay of
a crime scene. The giving birth mother exposes the unattractive site of birth.
Her privacy is violated, as she is a participant of the table orgy it seems like
some distant laughter echoed evilly in her attempt to give birth to that
violent child with the knife that cannot yet kill but targets surrounding world
with it’s pirate like curve.
In Pinocchio the gap between the hard, prosaic reality grows more and more
and the dreamy flexi reality may be able to reflex more truthfully
contemporary life with its complexity. No court of law yet defined the art
guilty of such reflection of unwanted truth, mimicking the facts of physical
world in connection of unlikely situations and less expected interpretations.
In the Pinocchio the puppeteer behind the staged performance of the orgy is
supposed to be the author of the painting, but is he?
The artist seems to be a mediator of social sadistic fantasies who entered
them through artistic mode on the canvas with almost childish frivolity but
with serious impact. In his works the heroes are freed from the burden of the
gendered flesh being puppets at the same table with people and creatures of
superpower or animals.
The works like Pinocchio, 911, Meat Grinder have some posttraumatic
content of the world in a process of loosing emotional content with its
murderous rage and maniac annoyance of speeded change.
The orgy which takes place at the table and under it could symbolize the
notion of an ‘absolute democracy.’
To the artist that is satirical, cynical, and tragic all at the same time, ‘the
most shameless thing.’ Jaisini shows a committee of three at the same
festive table where two are absent. The liar Pinocchio introduces the ruler.
The birds symbolize politicians whom artist saw as representatives of the
evils inherent in the legal and political machinery.
By arranging the partitions of the bodies by the table cloth, which covers and
opens bodies portions, Jaisini lends an erotic dimension to the somber,
grisaille color of the painting. The effect of sobriety, the controlled orgy, not
a temperamental and eager as in Hot Dog Party, but rather dead is achieved
here. It seems that the tablecloth demarcates two realities, which are not that
different from each other, with the same signs of sinnery, evoking man’s
abstruse appetite for 'bad.’ The table cloth opens a view that an aphorism
describes well: “the only truths which are universal are those gross enough
to be thought so.” Jaisini doesn’t adopt both, reality or unreal.
He allows his works to receive different interpretations and to continue
offering a mystery. A super plastic linear flow and images’ integration in
Jaisini’s work sketch out a new cosmology with the emotions, senses and
thoughts translated into visual terms.
The 'table’ composition in Pinocchio, Hot Dog Party, Barbie Q, and so on,
creates a phenomenological experience of space. Some things are effective
and eternally magnetic. Jaisini as an alchemist, searches for a philosopher’s
stone which can transmute base metals into gold. He canonizes the
technique of his enclosed composition of a secluded line together with the
continuous idea, almost a myth, a riddle, a fascinating concept, the artist
creates a new reality, fully integrated, with its own laws and reasons for
existence. The choice of images like Pinocchio, which are grotesque, brings
the image to a new universal meaning. The clowns and fools are the
representatives of the carnival spirit in the everyday life. In the Bosch’s
“Ship of Fools’ the scene is presided over by a jester fool, whose role is to
satirize the morals and manners of the day.
Fools posses the time-honored privilege to be other in this world, the right to
be in life but not of it, the right to confuse, to tease, to act life as a comedy
and to treat others as actors. Jaisini’s style is marked by theatrical
whimsicalism. His use of fools in some works could hold the artist’s hope for
humanity, hope that life is not necessarily predetermined towards loss,
failure, and catastrophe. To the contrary, the artists like Bosch believed that
sins of humankind are endemic and that hell is our ultimate destiny.
Jaisini creates in a carnivalesque tone his Show Time, Talk Show, Hot Dog
Party. Barbie Q, Lunch Time, Sinphony, etc., which reflects the current
condition of historical development when life becomes a permanent mixed
eruption of excitement, spectacle, happiness, joy, tragedy, loss, conflict,
dilemma, terror, and death.
Still, human destiny is conceived as open or at least as not finally tragic and
not predetermined to failure, but can change and transform.
The artist gets his impetus and irrepressible energy to create in sometimes
carnivalesque tone, as a social critique, nonetheless serious for being
theatrical, extravagant, and playful.
Carnivalesque may remain an always dangerous supplement, challenging
destabilizing, revitalizing, pluralizing single notions of true culture, true
reason, true art.
911
Oil on canvas
Triptych Signed W x H (“) 3 parts 3 x / 36 x 48
Early Period
This triptych is an early work where Jaisini had chosen the emergency
number as a decorative possibility for associative image making.
The artist may like the subject for its close connection to matters of life,
death, and super power. He has utilized the idea not only for its symbolic
meaning, but also for a visual purpose. In the triptych, side by side, coexists
a depiction of eternity, (“1” with water), and a briefness of human life (“1”
with Icarus).
The spatial fragmentation is a visual mode that creates a close up view.
The large 9, 1, 1 numbers are inserted and incorporated in the paintings’
surface that creates an optical illusion, as during a film development,
when images emerge from the background.
The left part of the triptych is No 9. This painting unites the number with a
mob of demons who were brought together by a voodoo dance.
The picture is willfully enigmatic but, at the same time, has a great power of
not the phenomena it depicts, but rather the medium itself, an integration of
the number with images visually. An anomalous space relationship in the
three parts creates magic experience of flame, water, and fall.
The three parts of the “911” triptych are to be read as a unity from left to
right. The layering juxtaposition of images spins the work in a dynamic
movement. “9” part exhibits a dance of spells when dark powers unfold the
disaster. This left part of triptych with “9” reminds an arched gateway to
Hell with the head devil situated diagonally from the top left corner towards
the right foreground. This image is actually a large wooden mask with a
huge white fang. A blue razor blade pierces its nose. The demon’s eyes are
rolled in from his exaltation of the weightless, ritual dance. The artist
disguises his personages of dark forces as monsters. For ages the Last
Judgments on the walls of churches had made much of frightful and
grandiose monsters. Jaisini applies the humorous overtone to a theme of
supernatural. In the center of “9,” there is a nude female demon with red,
absent eyes and bulging tongue, which speak more of her own ecstasy than
of terror. The color of “9” is not of an infernal pit, but instead is a heated
color of the African sun that liquefies air.
“1” with water shows “Flying Holland,” a phantom-ship, a legendary sign of
disaster for sailors. The ocean depths hold the remains of the shipwreck.
Skulls and treasures suggest of the life’s and earthly possessions’ transience,
“the momento mori” of a physical life. You might question the connection of
the three pictures and find some interesting possibilities.
What we have in “911” is not a universal course of events. It is an ordeal of
one man, who stays behind his creation and is a survived prototype for his
own judgment. Neither the beginning, nor the end of his tormented existence
is constructed here, but the lesson of a legend is. To fulfill his concept,
Jaisini uses the personages of Icarus who is a traditional image of an
inventor. The portrayal of Icarus by Jaisini is a spiritual trial, the expression
of delimitation that can happen of just-awakened and terrified consciousness
of man. Creation brings the artists close to the destructive powers from
beyond. Artists and inventors are familiar with this feeling of fall into abyss
that can also be a moment of rise.
Icarus is shown in the triptych separately from the treasure of the middle part
(1 with water) as he is not a mediocre man who used to be the center of
philosophical investigation as, for example in Bosch’s “Death and the
Miser.” In Jaisini’s “911” the Four Last Things, Death, Judgment, Hell,
Heaven, turn out in an unusual way.
Icarus looks at the destination of his fall with a weak, last hope, just as the
Bosch’s dying miser-man, for a miracle.
In Jaisini’s version, no one passes the test of Last Judgment, except for
Icarus. He represents the creative kind, whose legend never dies.
He is the one mortal left to face his destiny, yet undecided, is it to be the
rise, or the fall? The “911” triptych creates a concept of a life cycle that does
not stop, that blasts energy even through death. The work is a new poetic
representation of the human dream to reach powers which do not belong to
the human nature. When the limits are being pushed to a critical point
resulting in disaster, God is the one who is being called upon. In Jaisini’s
work, God is not rendered visually, but could be the painting’s concept, a
code of numbers for help, 9 1 1.