Marxh hegemony
Philosopher, economist, sociologist, historic, journalist and a revolutionary socialist, that was K. H. Marx (further only Marx). He left besides himself a monumental work, finished and reworked to its competition with thanks to his close co-worker, named F. Engels. Marx did not implement an ideology, but a scientific approach on a capitalistic society. His approach is with thanks to many aspects actual for next generations.  Marx's opinions are known around the whole world, was a source of an inspiration for many people, leaders and a big part of the world has been looking towards his opinions, which were slowly developed in differing opinion branches, ideologies. Up to 1989 in middle Europe ruled regimes, which have proclaimed edited Marx's theory, particularly Marx-Leninism as its credo. Year 89 was the year for them the last. SSRS and his satellite states have collapsed. East Europe has begun its transformation. With relict on Marx theory itis necessary to be added, that meanwhile East Europe has by years developed its ways into a collapse, the Western countries where communism did not succeed in founding its roots, they have grown a high living standard of the highest economic living standard. Especially the Nordic countries have led themselves to a high living standard, social belonging and a powerful state. Most of the population has freed themselves from the capitalistic pressure of over-value, and exactly the contrary to the beliefs founded a powerful society founded on the individuality of an entrepreneur and small companies, which depersonalization of a worker from his labour is irrelevant. (not in the case of France, edited in 2018) China has led its reforms and run its economic motor, led by the capitalistic principle. Momentarily itis a frequent source of discussions, the fact, that in a meaning the most successful capitalist have become the communists with their results. I dare to put a question what is in their forces up by now, and what would be the developments. Marx has seeded foundations of many ideas and is a ground point for many individuals. Contemporary material age materialism in Western Europe and the increasing potential of material companies in the post developing countries raises an important question, to what extent is the material world, in the respective world, resp. society around us the source of our ideas. Marx aside his thought ideas worked withHegels dialectism, against which he opposed his materialistic philosophy. In a quote,, the idea is nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and translated into forms of thought.â The world exists without dependency on our perception, thoughts are just its reflection in our brain and world is relatively possibly, and able to be discovered. Marx predictions of revolutions in the light of conflicts or disputes existing on the socio-economic level in western Europe did not fruit out. In the middle and the eastern Europe of the twentieth century, which went out from his thoughts, definitely did not come close to classless society and a state absent society. I tis a fact, that they achieved and contributed to a certain level of equity, compared to the states of capitalistic countries, where an increased space of inequality has been raised.  In a big scale. The ideas of Marx have had such a significant reach, that four out of ten people lived in so-called Marxist countries. The fight of classes, in the feelings of Marx, instead of a revolution, managed to intermediate, what we have seen in the past decades â capitalistic evolutions. Communism in China has been transformed and transforms into a successful market-oriented economy, east European countries have put on capitalistic coats and capitalistic Nordic countries are considered to be the most relevant social states. For a consideration, worth is the organisation of the Japanese society the so-called collective capitalism. The western part of Europe has managed to with capitalism build a more sustainable and humble life for most of its inhabitants with a higher success a sever before, in a comparison the countries controlled by the hegemony of the communistic ideology. Communism has made itself into a certain point of development of the human society. ,, today be equal is unequal, marginally inequal and unfair. This is the main point what we have to leave away. Equity was in place when the point was to everyone be fed, to live somewhere, get to dress something and wear some shoes... What is a contrast to the sustainability of communism is that momentarily a question is important? To what scale is capitalism, contemporary capitalism (which is so able to be modified), resp. its human approach in its framework., sustainable. Those ideas are fuelled by different events. We face another crisis of capitalism, which is systematic, more than a crisis of a certain sphere of a society. So-called crisis on its all fronts and still we face new challenges. Even so, capitalism did allow in the twentieth century to raise a big part of a society to middle class, from a little labour class. This, named as a petit burgeois was still not eliminated, as Marx has forecasted. Even an opportunity has been provided, that individuals might enter the highest examples of, I mean lives, of the society for certain individuals. The contemporary situation shows the current trend from two sides. A certain group of the population has risen to the middle class, but currently, it shows an increased risk, that its success was just short â term. For next, it begins to be shown that next realities are here and that that growing into a higher level of a society is the shift of time for some individuals harder and harder. So-called income scissors are in the society from the second world war greater and greater. Even if, the last years slowly show a reversal. Problematic is a point, that the wealthy individuals have an easier Access to means on how to increase in the ladder of a society and reach different standards of a society. Compared to individuals with a smaller capital reserves to start off with.
I tis undoubtedly reality that capitalism is a selection of a society which creates internal tensions, what has its own foundations in the clash of classes and their self-competition. In the western society for a part of a population, this fight has transformed itself with the development of a society into its modified level. Itis not directly a fight for maintaining of the standard over the level of poverty, but a fight for the level of wealth, which they can afford. I dare to say, itis the fight for fame and glory. In a contrast to a class, which has raised from its many clashes, in many developed countries, it created a society which is new. So in a contrast to evolving of rich classes, we have a new class of people so-called underclass people, which Marx has forgotten in his predictions. I dare to apply a success in an essay and differ the underclass for two categories. Which is the immigrants, which of force is neglectful, and the target they arrive to a country is poverty escape, seeing of a higher income, resp. a perception of a better life. On the other side, we can allow defining apart, which is possibly categorized as a white trash. The difference between these subcategories is, that one of them fights for a better position, meanwhile, the other part of the society has regretted the fight. Itis the product of capitalism and... well, or a frequent aspect of a society? On one side people come to a country, to its territory, to employ themselves for their better future, or their children. On the contrary, those countries in their current constellation are able to create part of a society, which has fallen to win this fight and gave up.
An increasing part of a society enjoys a higher or the highest level in society, the next part of a society has its own fight considerably higher. In a paradox, even for this class is the fight for a survival relatively higher, harder (simpler). I mean, to view survival in the age of middle times, I am chilled. The issue is in considering that people today fight for the ability to enjoy a high life, not to enjoy a life. Therefore our current fight happens in our heads, this fight is what we really see in the society, especially in the Western one. Are we thought to realize what we are the contributors of? It is being said, the consumer. Consumers society. Putting a question here, shall it be it this way? For which reasons we have created this circus? Have we ever wanted to kick off this engine?
                                                                                I approve that we have hereby created a level of wealth, which we can use for our life. Though if we think so, that the society is richer and on a higher level of living standard, I think, that we have left aside one single factor, which should be increasing hand to hand. The thing I mention is the ,, noblesse obligue!. Each of us has a certain share on the level, must feel responsible, for the reason he really has it. From society itis long â term impossible to take away more, as to give back, too. Maybe even that is the core of our current crisis stubbornness. The way the development of society increases, we must feel a higher degree of belongingness towards family, nature and in general to our surroundings. Exactly in a merit of how their importance increases. Capital is still a product of our own surroundings, no man or woman alone in a desert would not create a piece of a sand, sand of a capital, if yes, what would he use it for, if not for himself?
What are the essential issues of capitalism issues? Systematic problem is that it arises from the categorization of capitalism. Human consumption creates in developed countries the major instrument of wealth generation, income for the state apparatus. High possibility of consumption of domestic population is followingly connected with economic level of a society. Decreased of a consumption is a source of potential issues. Society is able to functionally in a given state work only if people desire new stakes, exists a demand for new products, which are produced by the companies.
Environmental part of the problem consists of the negative externalities caused by the society influencing and harming the living environment, ecosystems. In the European society, we challenge the nature since our industrial revolution with unpleasant effects of the human activities, colonialism did cause these effects to widen into new areas and currently holds a global character, what carries with itself a global threat. In the developed countries during the last decades, the consciousness of these influences grows and civil society has been engaged in these affairs. Disputable is the approach of people who reside in developing parts of the world, which is undergoing an increased, slow-paced industrialization. The burden of enslavement is in the Western world also thanks to many technological changes placed on the ecosystems we inhabit and cohabit with. Even if there is still a certain part of the society which is enslaved, mostly in the peripheries and border countries of the most developed countries, therefore outside the countries where most of the industrialization has been occurring during the last hundred of years (examples of cases when production units move abroad the centre of Europe or nature has devastating effects on countries which have not yet caused the most dramatic changes on the climate â Bangladesh and their floods are of a proper example.
Other instance of the problem regards the educational area. Young people are challenged to a certainly different world, reality, which has been present now, in a comparison to the present state of the world a century ago. They (us, being still a student), are faced with a higher dynamics of an environment in many areas. Information, outputs, relationships have developed a different standard in a comparison to the previous ages. We see as things change, are thrown away, instead of their fixing. Groceries and nurturing foods are being thrown away, inside all families, even corporations or firms. Information are present in an overflooding status. Media, television and Internet put children aside from school and their responsibilities.
Marx has therefore named a reality, which exists in the world order on the fundaments of capitalism and exists for his whole current existence. There exists an owner of production assets and then, the one who sells his labour. In the current sight of capitalism exists also a different contributor to this flow. Nature. On her shoulders stands all our existence and people even thought mostly mater themselves with their own well being. In the background still undergoes enslavement of nature, as a good, which is accessible to the most of us. From the statement of Marx, that the enslaver class would raise up against in according to its insider pressures, which the capitalistic system by its existence creates, we might dispute or state it might occur again (see revolutions since 1848 etc...) Thought with a sight on how really the revolution has been developed in Western Europe, we can say it was not a revolution, rather an evolution, intermediated by its people. Capitalism has shown an evident skill own normally to people, and that is to adapt to the circumstances. Communism in the case of China has as well in the story of its flow showed this certain adaptation skill. I conclude with a remark to the present age, that not an ideology is what can create a world, we are lusting after, but organisation and organizing of people with their efforts and devotion to do so.
In society, there is as well a possibility to see, that it is materialistic, relatively consuming orientated and it has with a combination of a weakened role of a family a chance to profile youth,, to its own imageâ.
One of Marx arguments inside his dialectic has gotten an importance during the last decades. The argument onto how slight quantitative chances are able to give a creation to high qualitative differences and are so obvious in the current Western culture. In an example, the difference between an athlete placed in the first spot of a ladder and the one on the last spot is very slight. The people thought to admire and celebrate only the first one, it is mostly the one who is placed on their posters inside peoples rooms. The sport has become the industry of most frequently placed profit â driven individualities and it has shaped itself, turning around him globally, certainly.
The flow of time has also shown that it is not so important on the way society is organized, what is the process of labour division, but more on how to individuals are from a long-term perspective sustaining and directing. Leadership of capitalism in the EU and in the USA has during the last decades not reached this standard. Crisis, which has mostly arrived during the last time, have arisen out of wrong or error-full decisions.  The ordering of the world as well depends upon the geographical position or a situation. The countries of Eastern Europe have so far, even with a cover of the capitalistic umbrella more Marxists view of economic affairs and capitalism is in the diapers. Data are useful in these cases.
Developments after the year 1989 are various, one of the most obvious is the change of societal order. The hegemony of the communist ideology has been forgotten. The concept of collectivism, mutualism, planned cooperation we have thrown away. Burned. We have places space, for changes and rates of change, have become an idea foundations of society that is democratic, social with a market economy.
The belief in a negative freedom, economic liberalism, atomistic viewpoint â are views, which are not rooted in our mentality.
The period of the last quarter of the year 1989 is forever written in the history of country Czech and Slovak, Moravia and also Silezia. We remember it as a period of important changes, changes which are forced with years of accumulated desires, wishes and also hunger, anger, despair and suffering. Changes have touched everything and everybody, punctually.
Up to the year of 89 our territory was dominated with the hegemony of Communist organisation. A contrast was beaten down by repressions, this was the size the regime has given himself a weight to his truth. Sports, arts, journalism, education, schooling, movements of people, families and even economy with its shoulders the regime has maintained control. The regime was only released by a full consensus of the communistic state apparatus, or the one in Moscow.
