The human had to create some rules that everyone should respect to live in a harmonic way, or the responsibility of this behavior will be payed. The Ethics maybe is what tear us apart of the wild nature side, but every time that we can’t handle a situation, we immediately get back of our savage form. The nature don’t follow ethics, isn’t wrong a wolf kill a deer, or a bear kill another bear, there aren’t rules in nature (maybe only survive and reproduce), the real identity of nature is wild, our real identity. It’s really easy to leave a human in his savage form, sometimes the modern times forget us the existence of survive, the place that ethics don’t exist, the modern human kill another human in nonsense war, kill a country with his companies, make another killers when the state are corrupted, when we got the extreme situation, the Ethics, moral and “all of the rules” made for our good behavior just disappear, there aren’t rules that save us of our purest form! Let’s imagine a fictional situation: You pay a bank to look your money, in security, you pay a tax every month for this service. Two month later you check the money and see that someone stole you $0,30, and like a normal bank, they could say that the system fail. Where’s the side of ethics? The robber show you the fail of the security part of the bank, the tax payed every month won’t be recovered, so the is the bank the real robbed? Maybe the robber stole you $0,30 for his survivor (Human wild behavior, the real rule). Maybe Ethics more relativity than non-inertial observers watching the movement of the another body. Maybe Ethics depends of the observer, or maybe ethics is zero when we consider the nature. Or maybe the ethics is a special rule of a specie that destroy his own home, maybe ethics don’t exist.