
Kiana Khansmith
untitled

tannertan36
Not today Justin
𓃗
No title available
EXPECTATIONS
Fai_Ryy
taylor price
Xuebing Du
No title available

Andulka

izzy's playlists!

Love Begins
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies
Keni
No title available
seen from Malaysia
seen from Nepal

seen from Sweden
seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland
seen from Iraq

seen from Canada
seen from Ukraine
seen from Morocco
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Vietnam
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mexico
@popwhatnow-blog
Counterpoint: True Blood Wants to Do Bad Things With You
True Blood is a popular show about vampires and many other supernatural creatures. As we see in “Dirty, Pretty Things” by Melissa Maerz, the show actually started as sort of an allegory for the struggle faced by homosexuals and other subaltern groups. As time went on they decided to move away from that and focus more on sex and action. The show always had some problems, but this change in tone really cemented some of the show's more negative elements. Let's take a look at the ways in which True Blood reinforces hegemony.
True Blood has a lot of problems with male characters holding power and dominance over female characters. Sookie, despite having some powers of her own, almost always has to be saved by men. If Bill doesn't save her, then Eric saves her. If Eric doesn't save her, the Alcide saves her. If Alcide doesn't save her, then Sam saves her. If Sam doesn't save her... well, you get the idea. She is constantly being told where she should go and what she should do, all in the name of protecting her. Most of the time she is only in trouble because of one of these supernatural men to begin with. Sookie is also constantly being manipulated by men, sometimes even without her knowledge. When Sookie drinks Bill's blood, in order to heal her after she was attacked, it causes her to have sex dreams about Bill. This directly leads to her becoming infatuated and pursuing a relationship with him. Later, Eric tricks Sookie into drinking his blood and she then has sex dreams about him. That's right, drinking vampire blood gives you sex dreams about that vampire. It also allows the vampire to sense where you are. That is messed up. While this power isn't inherently specific to male vampires, the show almost always shows it in this context. Sookie is being watched and on some level controlled by the vampires without even realizing. We even find out later that the vampires are only initially interested in Sookie because she has special blood. She isn't even being fought over as a person, but as a container of a special liquid.
Even the more mild mannered Sam holds some form of dominance over his female employees by requiring them to dress in revealing attire. The women are being dressed not for the physical job they do, but for the male customers who look at them. While Laura Mulvey talks about women in film performing for the male gaze in “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” the same ideas can be applied to women in a restaurant. Sookie and the other waitresses are dressing up to perform for the male customers. Not to be outdone by vampires, Sam also follows Sookie around, while transformed into a dog, without her knowledge. He does this, much like the vampires, in an attempt to protect her. While his actions are more passive than Bill or Eric, he is still treating Sookie as though she cannot take care of herself. For as much as Sookie asserts that she can, in fact, take care of herself, the men in her life pretty much never listen. Even the female vampire Lorena is shown being physically dominated by Bill, despite her supposed position above him as his maker. We'll get back to them in a second.
But, hey, what's power without sex? Not an HBO show, that's for sure. True Blood is full of sex. While there are good points being made about representations of sexuality in the show, there are also problems. The sex in True Blood is often linked with violence. When a vampire has sex they have a strong desire to feed. Being bitten during sex is shown as a common practice. Things can get far worse than a little biting though. When Bill is shown having sex with Lorena, he physically twists her head around 180 degrees so he can continue to finish the act without having to look her in the eye. She is a vampire, so she was more or less fine, but it was still a disturbing scene. What is even worse than that, is that there are multiple occasions in which the show depicts non-consensual sex. Franklin, a particularly psychotic vampire, is easily about to overpower and kidnap the human Tara. He keeps her locked up and rapes her. Tara suffers not just physical, but also immense mental trauma. We also see Jason, Sookie's brother, being kidnapped, and repeatedly raped by female werepanthers. When sex is associated with violence it leads to many problems including real life domestic violence. We can see parallels of supernatural sex and domestic violence in other works as well. As Tanya Ezren points out in “Forbidden Fruit Tastes the Sweetest,” the first time Edward and Bella have sex in Twilight, Bella is left violently bruised. Sexual violence is all too common in supernatural stories.
Finally, while True Blood does an admittedly good job of including a variety of representations of different people, not all of those representations are positive. There are very clear class differences present. True Blood takes place in a somewhat poor area of Louisiana. Almost none of the human characters are shown to be wealthy or particularly classy. Yet the vampires, who are shown to have the most power and influence, are very high class. They are rich and well dressed. They live in mansions or own businesses. They have Kings and Queens. The vampires are also shown to have their own sort of shadow government that seems to be in control of a lot of what happens in the world. In contrast, we have lots of representations of lower class characters who work in physical labor jobs, or are even criminals. These characters are often werewolves, werepanthers, or shifters. They all turn into animals. So these characters who work with their bodies and have very little political influence or power are directly correlated with animals. They are also sometimes shown under the control of the high class vampires. Even Sam, who owns his own business, isn't considered high class. When we meet his family, they are trashy criminals. The entire clan of werepanthers are depicted as extremely stupid, incestuous, drug dealers. In addition, it is only the powerful, high class vampires who are known to the public. The lower class wereanimals and shifters are hidden from the masses. It's a problem when we associate lower class, blue collar people with animals that are almost sub-human. Conversely, we associate wealth, prestige, and high class with vampires who are powerful and super-human. This puts more and more emphasis on money and power and further reinforces the social stratification already present in our society.
True Blood has some good things going for it, but it still has a lot of problems. As long as relationships are predominated by dominance, violence, and class, there are going to be problems. Not just problems on the show, but problems that translate all too easily into the real world.
This is a point/counterpoint analysis on True Blood with lwilmes2.
Mini Media: Warm Bodies
Even zombies are getting in on the action. Warm bodies is a love story between a zombie and a human. It's an interesting twist on the supernatural love story. It's not focused so much on sex and it is focused on love conquering all! What is this, a Disney movie? It's also an interesting departure in that the story is less about the danger and the forbidden appeal of dating a supernatural creature. There still is danger of course. Instead it follows a zombie who, through the power of love, slowly starts to regain his humanity. It is when he is fully human once again that the romance is fulfilled.
It's interesting that supernatural creatures can be used to explore more tame ideas of romance in addition to exotic sex practices. It also shows that not all supernatural creatures are glorified as better than human. In this case the zombies wish to be human once again.
Mini Media: Juno
I apologize for the poor quality of the video, but the audio is coming in strong and that is what matters.
In this scene from the movie Juno, the title character, a pregnant teen, is receiving an ultrasound when the technician makes a comment about how it's a relief that the baby is being adopted.
This is a wonderful scene because it addresses a common problem with teen mothers. People assume they are bad mothers just because of their age. People are so quick to judge a mother's fitness based solely on her age, financial status, or if she is married. This is ridiculous. A lot more goes into being a good mother than being 30 and having a husband. Even those mothers have to deal with criticism depending on how much time they spend away from their children. Being a mother is a complicated job. There is no one right way to do it and it's not something that should define a person's character anyway. Just because someone is young doesn't mean they aren't caring. And being a good mother isn't the one and true goal of womanhood. People just need to chill out with the judgment.
Unit Post: Purity
Let's talk about purity. Purity is an interesting concept. There are these ideas in our society that a woman's sexual purity is extremely important. This is so true that women are often valued and judged solely on their sexuality. A woman's virginity is thought to be something that should be protected. This takes a woman's own sexuality out of her control.
In the documentary The Purity Myth we see many cases of this. Young women are flooded with information about how precious their virginity is. Sex is taught to be a strictly negative thing if it happens outside of hegemonic heterosexual marriage. Most of these talks are full of misinformation. Some data is skewed to seem threatening and some things are just all out lies. Our government spends insane amounts of money on promoting these abstinence only scare tactics, despite the fact that the don't work. In addition, these messages focus almost solely on young women while ignoring the part young men play in teen sex and pregnancy. Despite it being clear that society doesn't think that women should have control over their own sexuality, they certainly take more than the fair share of the blame.
Since woman simply cannot control their own sexuality, we also have events called purity balls. Purity balls are dances where young girls (sometimes far too young to even begin thinking about sex at all) make a pledge to save themselves for marriage and maintain their purity. The fathers of these young girls then pledge to defend their purity. Because, you know, a girl's purity is constantly under attack.
Yeah. Keep in mind that there is no male equivalent of a purity ball. Young men don't pledge to save their innocence while their mothers vow to fight off any young lady suitors. That is because we don't define men purely on their sexuality. We also trust them to handle their own business. Women are rarely afforded this trust.
So what's the bottom line? Women are defined by their sexuality. Whether that is a pure innocent maiden or a sexually aggressive vixen, it doesn't matter. Women aren't treated like the multidimensional people that they are. We can't boil them down to one element and then take control of that element away from them. That makes women less than human and that leads, as we've seen throughout the year, all sorts of trouble.
Unit Post: Supernatural Sexuality
The idea of sexuality being intertwined with supernatural creatures might sound bit odd. Yet, especially as of late, it is an increasingly common trope. With shows like True Blood, The Vampire Diaries, and Teen Wolf, and movies such as Twilight, these supernatural creatures are getting more action now than ever. So why is supernatural sex so popular?
Well, for one thing, we live in a sexually repressed society. This is true especially for women. So when the real world won't let you explore your sexuality, you turn to fantasy. These fantasies allow not only for sexual expression, but for the added bonus of exploring parts of sexuality you might not ever be comfortable doing in real life. Having an illicit affair with a vampire or a werewolf is dangerous and therefore exciting. There is also something alluring about the forbidden nature of a supernatural romance. Let's have a look at one of the most popular examples in recent year. Let's look at Twilight.
I know this is technically from the last movie, but I'd much rather look at the pie maker than big hair mcstalks-a-lot or the shirtless chipmunk. Anyway...
Twilight follows Bella, the socially awkward (and otherwise bland) teen who meets and falls in love with a vampire, Edward. Despite Edward's constant warnings that Bella isn't safe being with him, Bella continues to pursue a relationship. There is a constant sense of danger and excitement within their relationship. Unfortunately, that danger is very real for Bella. She isn't the only one suffering though. The movie creates a lot of problems for those watching it as well.
First of all, Edward stalks Bella. For real, the dude shows up in her bedroom at night and watches her sleep without her knowledge. So that's a great start to a healthy relationship. In addition, both Edward and Jacob, a werewolf, constantly try to protect Bella from danger. They both try to tell her where to go and what to do. They claim that it's what's best for her. That is, of course, ignoring the fact that she probably wouldn't be in any danger if it weren't for them in the first place. Bella seems to love Edward though, so things continue forward. Despite being very vocal about wanting to have sex, Bella is constantly rejected by Edward, again in what he claims is an attempt to protect her. Because Edward is a vampire, he possesses super speed and super strength. The problem with this is that is greatly skews the power dynamics in their relationship. This is probably the biggest problem, not only with Twilight, but with all shows involving supernatural sex.
Why do we care? Well, if a human is involved with a supernatural character, then that character has far more power than the human just by virtue of what they are. Couple this with the fact that power dynamics in regular human relationships are already often skewed and what we have is trouble. In these shows and movies we see recurring themes of jealousy, obsession, control, and violence. It may just take place in a fantasy world, but there are very real parallels to the real one. These unhealthy relationships are being romanticized and young women are exposed to them at especially impressionable ages. We have to be very careful that we don't allow fantasy to cloud reality. These overbearing, scary, abusive lovers are not cool.
This is a fantastic article about a high school senior, Katelyn, in West Virginia who protested her school's abstinence-only assembly. Her school hired a conservative speaker who is known for making outrageous claims, not unlike the speakers we watched in class.
Katelyn refused to attend and flied an official complaint about the assembly. What is shocking to hear is that her principal, in addition to thinking the assembly was a good idea to begin with, threatened to call the college to which Katelyn had already been accepted and tell them that she had "bad character" and was a "backstabber."
The idea that she isn't allowed to express her own opinion is one thing, and sadly something perhaps all of us have run into during high school, but that he would threaten her for disagreeing with his agenda... That is next level bonkers. This kind of thing CANNOT be tolerated. I am so glad that Katelyn stood her ground. I am glad that her story is out there to inspire the rest of us. The world could use more people like her.
Revelant Reblog: X-Factor (no, not the television show)
X-Factor the Marvel comic! X-Factor is an ongoing series about a group of mutants who run a detective agency. It has a lot of awesome things going for it, like religious diversity and some interesting LGBTQ characters. What I want to talk about right now though, are costumes. Specifically Monet St. Croix, also know as M, and the trouble with her zipper.
So the characters in X-Factor do good, but they aren't necessarily your fly in and save the day type of superheroes. They takes cases and kind of do their own thing. They do have costumes, but don't always wear them. Well, that was until a couple of years ago when Marvel tried to make the universe a little more cohesive. The book underwent some renumbering and everyone got new costumes. M has never been one for covering up, but what she ended up in was this:
I'm really not sure how she can fly around and beat people up without her boobs making a dramatic escape.
I'm not the only one who noticed either. Fans (both male and female) complained. A lot. I mean, I guess fans complain a lot all the time, especially involving change, but this time it worked! It was a slow process. Comics aren't as quick to change as something like the internet. It's not just because they are an old medium, but because issues just take a lot of time to produce. Anyway, eventually even the other characters got fed up with M's attire and we were treated to this:
And if Pip is tired of it, then it must be bad. Dude is not known for being classy. As annoyed as she was, M listened. All they did was zip up the zipper and we went from a 70/30 exposed boob to clothing ratio to this:
I know, I'm as surprised as you are. What a difference a zipper makes. It's almost funny how simple of a change it was and how huge of a difference it made. Now M looks like she could actually kick some ass. She totally can too by the way.
I'd listen to her if I were you.
So the moral of the story is, trolling people is awesome and we should all do it.
Er... wait. That's not right is it? Oh! I know!
Okay, so listen up people who make comics (television shows, movies, video games, or whatever) because I know you are totally reading this right now. Stop putting awesome female characters in costumes with their boobs hanging out as if we're likely to forget they're women otherwise. It's clearly not necessary. We're better than this. And to those of us who read, watch, or play whatever, we don't have to stand for this kind of stuff. Our opinions can be heard. We live in the future.
Unit Post: Claiming Sexuality
From a young age-- too young really-- women are told to keep their sexuality in check. Many believe that, if it there wasn't a need to make babies, women wouldn't even need sexuality. We do need babies though, so we can't straight up cock block the ladies completely. Instead what happens is women are taught that their sexuality is something that needs to be controlled and repressed. Even when there are no men around, many women, especially older women, feel completely uncomfortable discussing sex or even admitting to having a sex drive. This is where the book Fifty Shade of Grey comes into play.
Fifty Shades of Grey is a book and about a young woman, Ana, who engages in a sexual relationship with a slightly older man, Christian. The book is full of sex. Ana and Christian have so much sex. They engage in a BDSM (Bondage & Discipline, Dominance & Submission, Sadism & Masochism) relationship. Well they kind of do. While the book can be an introduction to the BDSM community, it also has some problems. We'll get to that later. First, let's talk about what Fifty Shades of Grey does well.
In the book, Ana, our young virginal (not for long) heroine has a very strong sex drive. She wants sex and she wants it often. She is very vocal in her desires. This is very important because we live in a society where women are judged for their sex drives. Many young women are actively being told they shouldn't want or participate in sex. Many older women have that so ingrained in them they don't even discuss sex with their sexual partners, including their husbands. For older women especially, Fifty Shades of Grey is a way for them to explore their own sexuality. Women can talk about the book with each other openly and get into issues they might have never discussed. Even in their current sexual relationships, the book might act as a gateway for thinking about or even trying BDSM practices. It could be as simple as just giving women the courage to think about what they might want to try and telling them it's okay. I'm not sure exactly why it was this particular book that took off as it did since there are certainly other sexual romance books out there, but it's doing some good.
Of course, it's not perfect. Even if we ignore the grammar, Fifty Shades of Grey has more than a few problems. While Ana does often convey her sexual desires to Christian, not every sexual encounter they have in consensual. That is never okay. It doesn't matter what their history is, if both partners are not 100% into an act, then it should not be happening. In addition, the book sometimes conflates sex and violence, which as we've seen in the past, can lead to so many problems. While BDSM practices can simulate violence, they are completely consensual and understood to be play, which makes a huge difference. Also, Christian is (self-proclaimed) mentally unstable, which further complicates their sexual relationship.This is especially a problem for BDSM where it's very important that both partners are in good mental standing to engage in play.
The book is certainly well known. It gets people talking and that's important. It may have some problems, but as long as those problems are identified and discussed then the good in it outweighs the bad. That is, if you can get past lines like:
“Two orgasms... coming apart at the seams, like the spin cycle on a washing machine, wow.”
Seth Macfarlane hosted the most recent Academy Awards and his act faced a lot of criticism. Most notably, he made a lot of sexist jokes, which is kind of his schtick I guess? Even so, it appears the academy wants him to host again. Of course this isn't set in stone. In fact, Macfarlane himself commented after his first stint as host that he wasn't interested in returning. Still, as the article pointed out, Macfarlane's turn as host provided a 3% rating increase for the award show. Where there are ratings there are advertisers. Where there are advertisers there's the most important thing of all:
So it's clear that it's not the value of your content that matters; it's your ability to make money. Can't see how that could ever backfire for society...
Unit Post: Fangirls, Fanboys, and Fandoms
I'm sure we can all think of an experience we've had where we read a book or a comic, play a video game, or watch a television show or a movie. When friends walk out of a movie together they want to immediately discuss it afterward. A fandom is basically like that only amplified. A fandom is a community of people who not only enjoy a piece of media, but they discuss it and interact with it. Some texts have larger, more prominent fandoms than others (think Star Trek or Harry Potter) but there are fandoms for pretty much anything that comes out. Google the title of your favorite television show and you will find websites dedicated to it. They can range from active discussion forums, to meticulous encyclopedias of every possible detail from every single episode. The same goes for other media as well. What these communities have to offer is something very special. We are used to the media acting upon us. With fandoms, the fans themselves are given a chance to act upon the media.
One of the easiest ways to see this is by looking at fanfiction. Fanfiction is created by writing a story of your own creation that is based off of existing characters from a particular text. These stories can be (almost) completely within the original canon-- the events from the original text-- or can be take place in situations that don't resemble the original events at all. Some fanfiction takes place in alternate universes where the setting is completely changed and only the characters and perhaps their original relationship dynamics are preserved.
These stories excel in their ability to allow the fans to directly shape the texts that they love. There are not a lot of LGBTQ representations on television, but there is a whole sub-genre of fanfiction, slash, that explores same sex character pairings. Fanfiction also ranges from cute fluff to full on sexually explicit smut. This is a great way that teenagers (and adults) can explore their views on sexuality in a safe and fun space. Women are often taught that their sexuality should be protected and repressed. Fanfiction is an outlet to see female characters who want and actively pursue sex. Even though they may not do so in the main text, fans are able to read into what is given to them and explore it in new ways. They can also share these explorations with others.
Because fanfiction exists in communities that are pretty much unregulated (such as on the internet) they allow for an impressive amount of freedom of expression. Underrepresented groups can become represented within a fandom and there are times when fan pairings become far more popular than the actual canon pairings from the original text. Fandoms can also influence the original texts themselves. The stronger a fan response to a certain character is, the more likely they are to stick around in a series. Veronica Mars recently had an overwhelming successfully kickstarter campaign to fund a Veronica Mars movie. This only happened because of the fandom surrounding that show which not only connected fans, but kept interest in the show alive despite it having been off the air for several years. This is one of the few areas of media where we can see fans directly impacting the media they enjoy instead of just being subjected to whatever is thrown out at them. Over time, the fandom itself becomes arguably more important to affecting people's lives than the original text. And most of that power lies in our own hands.
That's Not Funny is a documentary in the making that is exploring the concept of what is and isn't acceptable in comedy. One of the biggest topics that has come up in comedy in the past year rape. Rape is obviously a very serious issue. Is it okay for someone to joke about such a serious topic? Some people would argue that it's not okay to joke about rape because it is still such a prevalent threat in our society. Maybe when it's no longer a problem, then we can look back and joke about it. Some people will find that very idea outlandish. You can NEVER make a joke about something so horrifying. Then there are others who would support the idea that anything can be funny. If we can't make jokes about rape, can we still make jokes about other tragic events? Where does the line get drawn? If something horrible happens to me personally, am I allowed to make a joke about it then? Does that change the level of offense to those around me?
Is the problem that topics are being spoken about at all? Maybe some things are just too horrible to even discuss. Or is the problem that a joke makes light of a serious situation? Does a joke have to make light of something? I don't think that, just because something is funny, it can't be serious or have a message. If we can't make jokes about tragedies, then where does that leave satire? Is it still okay to be satirical about something as long as there is a message behind it that those who would be offended support? How can we even begin to quantify this? How much of the problem is intent? Is it worse for something to make a racist joke if they are actually racist. Is it okay to make the same racist joke if the intent of the joke is to bring attention to the fact that other people are racist and they shouldn't be? Is that even possible? Maybe offensive is just offensive and intent have nothing to do with it at all. Even someone attempting satire can say a sexist joke than rings true to someone who is actually sexist and all irony is lost on them. To what extent is the comedian responsible for that?
I know I just asked 600 questions. I don't really have any answers. I just think the discussion is fascinating. It's also hard. I'm not even sure where my own person views on this lie. My gut reaction is that we should be able to joke about anything. Comedy is a wonderful thing that brings joy and helps us work through tough issues that we otherwise might not be able to handle. On the other hand, I definitely hear jokes being made that simply make we wince. I can't believe people joke about certain things. Is it actually the subject matter that is the problem? Maybe I just don't find them funny. Maybe it's just too soon. But then, when will it not be too soon? At the same time, maybe the benefit IS that it's too soon. Sure something tragic and horrible is being framed in a humorous way, but it's still being talked about. Then that leads to it being talked about more. So these things we often ignore as a society are being pulled into the spotlight. That's probably beneficial. I think so. I don't know.
Mini Media: SMBC
Hit this for the link to the full comic.
I think this perfectly sums up the most common problem with having a discussion on the internet. For any issue, not just race, there are reasonable people who are willing to have a meaningful discussion on either side. The problem is there are also people who just want to yell and hate, again on both sides. What happens, for the most part, is even when a discussion starts off civil, it eventually devolves into a screaming match. Or I guess online it's more of an ALL CAPS match. The point is, no matter how reasonable you are, when you're paired against someone yelling pure hatred, you're either going to give up entirely or you're going to start firing back anger in turn. Either way nothing really get accomplished. It's important that we start realizing this is happening so that we can find ways around it. We can work together to solve pretty much anything, we just have to filter out the noise first.
Unit Post: Race and Cyberspace
The internet is a wondrous place. It allows for communication across the world pretty much instantly. It also allows us to explore different facets of ourselves. Because the internet allows a user to be mostly anonymous, we can place emphasis on certain parts of our personalities without fear of personal judgment or consequence. We are even free to explore things that might never have come up before and all without having to worry how to explain it to anyone else. Of course, as it is with most things, that freedom has a downside. When you take away consequences, you open up who new possibilities for the spread of hate.
Let's say you can make it online to begin with (which is very much a privilege) so you have access to pretty much anything you can imagine. That's not restricted to just things you want though. That includes a lot of people yelling a lot of things. That includes racism.
Give a person a soapbox to stand on. Let them say whatever they want. Now, take away any consequences for doing so. You're going to hear some crazy stuff. That may be only a small percentage of what is available, but it's out there and it is loud. There are always going to be those people who are just blatantly racist, but what we also see are people who are being racist without even realizing they are. Maybe they're just in denial?
Let's take a look at notracistbut.com. Feel free to browse if you can stomach it. I'll wait for you.
Back? Okay then, let's take a closer look together:
Wow. I hate to hear what it sounds like when you ARE being racist.
It's really quite puzzling. I'm honestly not sure if the people who say these things actually think they're not being racist or if they just think they're being clever in trying to hide it. I'm also not sure which is worse. Scratch that, I've decided. The first one is worse. It's one thing to be a racist. It's a terrible thing that helps no one in the long run. It's right there though. It's there for us to fight. On the other hand, the idea that someone could be educated enough to be aware of racism, know that it's a bad thing, and still make these comments blows my mind. I'm not sure how to fight that. They're not ignorant on the concept of racism so I can't just explain that to them and hope it gets better. They understand full well that it is frowned up in society enough to know that they don't want people thinking they are racist. So that's off the table. What's left? I'm not sure how to open a dialog here.
All I can really take away from this is that SOMETHING needs to be done. We are so much better than this. We are taking a wonderful tool of progress and using it to make things worse instead of better. Dudes, seriously. That this level of hatred could be so ingrained in people they don't even realize they are perpetrating it (and forcing it on others) is like...
I just...
Mini Media: Donkey Kong Country
It only just now occurred to me that Donkey Kong Country is 19 years old. I still find it relevant, however, as I was just replaying it last month. Plus there are still sequels coming out now. Anyway, let's get this barrel rolling...
In the first part of her Tropes vs. Women in Video Games series, Anita Sarkeesian addresses the overused damsel in distress trope. I think one of the most interesting points she makes is that, a lot of the time, the damsel character isn't even a character as much as she just represents something that was stolen from the male hero which he needs to win back. This model is used over and over. Above is the intro and a little bit of gameplay footage from Donkey Kong Country for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System. What I want to point out is that, very much like the classic damsel in distress trope, Donkey has has something stolen from him and he, and his pal Diddy Kong, spend the entire games fighting to get it back. Of course in this instance it's not a damsel at all, but a hoard of bananas. Poor DK is still pretty upset about it though. As a plot device it functions exactly the same.
So we continue, even today, creating these very interesting female characters in games and then completely wasting them by giving them the role of kidnapped banana. There is no reason that a hero has to rescue a women in order to be a hero. That just seems to come into play because of existing views on the weakness of women that are being implanted into these made up fantasy worlds. It really is a complete waste.
Also, in Donkey Kong Country 2: Diddy's Kong Quest, it is Donkey Kong himself who is kidnapped.
He does not free himself. He remains kidnapped the entire game until he is rescued by Diddy Kong and Diddy's girlfriend Dixie Kong. I think this is a refreshing take on an overused gimmick. A refreshing take that happened in 1995... Yeah. So why oh why are games still set on kidnapping ladies? It really speaks to the lack of respect women receive in the gaming world, and outside the gaming world alike. Come on people, we saw these patterns almost 20 years ago, why haven't we moved past them yet? We need to save women from being saved.
Unit Post: Video Games & Sexism
Video games are entire worlds that we create. They have the potential to be anything we can imagine. But, often times, game designers pull from real life for inspiration. Write what you know. That isn't inherently bad. The problem comes when the parts of the real world that creep in are the worst parts, such as racism, homophobia, and sexism.
Character design easily lends itself to racism. The easiest way to let someone know who they should shoot and who they should save is to make the bad guys look different from the good guys. Couple this with the belief that a white male hero will sell the most games and you end up with games using persons of color as villains. It's not even subtle racism.
Most of the time, homophobia comes into the gaming world not with what the games portray, but with what they almost never do: LGBTQ characters. What few LGBTQ characters do make it into games are almost always highly stereotypical. What we mostly get are fake lesbians. They never have any kind of meaningful relationships. Mostly they just have giant boobs.
That brings us to sexism. Female characters in video games are not treated well. They are very rarely lead characters. Sometimes they're simply kidnapped the entire game. Even when they are fighting side by side with male characters, the armor they wear (if it can even be called that) is often much more revealing and less functional.
Nevermind that my heart is exposed, my nipples are safe and secure! One of my legs might even survive. Bonus!
What is worst of all is that women who play video games are often treated even worse than their polygonal counterparts. Despite making up 47% of video game players, women are constantly ostracized and straight up abused when playing games online. Video games are competitive by nature, but the insults that women face are far more serious than simple trash talking. It doesn't even matter if you're good at a game or not, if other players know (or even suspect) you are female you will be berated with insults, slurs, threats of physical and sexual violence, and requests for sexual favors. Just head over to the blog Fat, Ugly, or Slutty to have a look at what women face on a daily basis. Even other men are treated to homophobic or racist slurs as they play. How did a fun escape turned into a hateful nightmare?
Short answer: A complete lack of consequences.
Players are largely anonymous. There is very little accountability. Even when games are being monitored, it's impossible to keep up with every chat happening during every game. Then, even if someone is reported for being abusive, what happens? Probably nothing. Maybe they get banned from the service. Even then they can usually just make a new account and continue on their merry way. Most of the time it probably won't even get that far anyway. So what is the incentive for people to act civil if no one is making them?
Honestly, it's horrifying to think that the second people are given free reign they turn into monsters. Of course this isn't true of everyone who plays games. In fact it's really a very small percentage. The problem is that this very small percentage is very loud and they manage to spread their hatred to a very large number of good, upstanding players. We need to find a way to make this absolutely unacceptable. Part of that comes with finding better ways to keep these people out of games. There need to be consequences for their actions. The other part comes with making a wider variety of game characters and depictions of people of all kinds. As games become more all inclusive, hating on people for being different becomes harder and harder to accept.
Mini Media: Adventure Time
What time is it?
Adventure Time is a cartoon currently airing on Cartoon Network. It focuses on the adventures of a young hero, Finn, and his best friend, Jake. The world is full of a lot of interesting things, but more importantly to the next few paragraphs, it's full of princesses! I mean FULL of princesses. Here is just a sample:
Hot Dog Princess, Lumpy Space Princess, Muscle Princess
Turtle Princess, Wildberry Princess, Princess Bubblegum
I would love to talk for 8 days straight about how amazing they all are, but let's keep in simple and focus on Princess Bubblegum.
Princess Bubblegum is arguably the main princess character on the show. She is also a very interesting mix of classic princess tropes and less hegemonic feminine traits.
As one might expect, she often needs our hero Finn to rescue her or her kingdom from some kind of trouble. She is also excessively pink. Her skin, hair, and (most of the time) her clothing is all pink. She is often seen wearing dresses and spends a decent amount of time concerned with her appearance.
However, there are also multiple times where Princess Bubblegum does the rescuing. She is extremely smart. She loves science and can often be seen doing science on the show. I feel like that alone does more for young girls than any Disney movie. She is also shown actually ruling her kingdom. She has to make tough decisions and stand by them. She can be aggressive or kind depending on the situation.
You can see in the video above one brief example of how Princess Bubblegum not only enjoys science, but actually does it. Of course she also gets turned into a zombie and needs to be rescued. It's a very interesting back and forth. I'm definitely glad children are growing up with these more varied representations of female characters available to them.