Untitled

[radrook2]

This illustrates how parents can be very influential to the success of their kids.

[radrook2]

AI Grok responds to the claim that Shem the Son of Noah and ancestor of the Israelites was black and that the Israelites were black.

[radrook2]

Grok very effectively proves this claim false .

[radrook2]

The request that I am referring to is the one that required Grok to respond to questions concerning abiogenesis and intelligent design by strictly adhering to strict logic, mathematical probabilities and strict Observational science, alone.

[radrook2]

Grok: ( Math, observational Science, and Logic) =God Exists

That is the conclusion why AI Grok reached after adhering to these very important and essential principles.

[radrook2]

AI Grok: How English and Spanish are Intertwined: I provided a list of Spanish word which are strongly associated with English requested that Grok AI add its own, It also provided a commentary on the subject.

[radrook2]

Debunking the RNA Hypothesis

The video provides very compelling reasons why RNA cannot be accomplishing what atheists say it did. It also exposes the unethical way that they set up experiments in order to lend support to their claims.

[radrook2]

This video illustrates how atheists are the ones who are being illogical setting aside logic in order to provide their illogical based on their refusal to reason..

[radrook2]

I find absolutely nothing in the questions which forces the AI to provide illogical information as was claimed by another AI in self defense. Instead, what I see is AI responding in accordance to logic when specifically asked, and in a biased manner when asked without the parameters which prevent it offering unjustifiable responses. In short, it blatantly contradicts itself by offering consensus as the reliable answer but only admitting the truth when pressured into it. In short, it provides false answers as true while acknowledging the as being wrong. Of course, being a mindless machine, it cannot appreciate the absurdity of what it is admitting. Which beckons the question of who indeed is programming these machines to ignore logic in order to support atheistic ideas? The only conclusion that can be reached is that atheists themselves who control the machine or who had a part in its programing, are cunningly choosing this way of watering down what AI really considers to be truth in order to protect their atheistic preferences.

[radrook2]

@Radrook353 Obviously they tweaked it so that it protects the atheistic views by basing responses on popularity or consensus alone as if both were evidence of truth. Ask it is they are and it will say that such a conclusion constitutes fallacious reasoning.

Grok gives Radiometric Dating zero Validity.

[radrook2]

This video proposes that the understanding for the motive of the destruction of these cities is a misunderstanding. The motive is described as involving far more serious one related to the security of mankind.

[radrook2]

The powerful AI Grok, provides a very balanced assessment of the troublesome situation in Minneapolis, suggests feasible alternatives to the present provocative policies.

[radrook2]

I find Grok's responses to all my inquiries extremely helpful. That is why I am collecting our conversations as valuable references.

[radrook2]

The doubt about the authenticity of those lunar landings back during the 1960's has been recently intensified by the extreme caution which another Lunar landing is being approached despite current technological superiority. Most of us expected it to be a walk in the park. After all, the technology available at that time is inferior to the one we have now sat our disposal. For example, 1960's Computers involved in those landings were far inferior to those available now. We also lacked all the experienced that has been accumulated from our low Earth orbit flights. So if indeed there was to be fear, then one would naturally expect it to be by those astronaut and scientist back then and definitely not now. However, despite these facts being true, and despite all the conspiracy theories in relation to those voyages,. Grok tells us that those trips were indeed authentic and presents us with compelling evidence to support that claim,

[radrook2]

Amazing how the video narrator desperately strives to minimize the significance of what Grok just said. It's as if he is pleading with the viewers to base their belief in a creator on blind belief. Seems as if he NEEDs this to be the attitude in order for him to be able to glibly dismiss what they say. As if he prefers a blind faith so he can feel comfortable in his theophobic position. He also misrepresents the reason for belief in a creator as having been blind faith when it was based on what creation reveals, a creative mind at work

[radrook2]

FINALLY AN confirmation OF WHAT CREATIONISTS HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR DECADES, THAT THE MATHEMATICS CLEARLY INDICATES THAT THESE ATHEIST CLAIMS ARE MATEMATICALL IMPOSSIBLE.. Which conclusively proves that they are sacrificing science at the alter of their theophobia and counting on the undereducated trust and gullibility to believe their phobic quackery.

[radrook2]

No Preview Available

What Excessively Patriotic Christians Forget      You see them all the time, people professing to be both Christians and believers in the bible, while  fanatically placing all their hopes for a better world on the nations they feel were chosen for the task.  

       But what is so serious about believing that the solution to Earth problems will be solve by mankind via one nation? The article explains in detail.