No title available
š©µ avery cochrane š©µ
romaā
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
ā£ Chile in a Photography ā£
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
shark vs the universe
taylor price
blake kathryn
almost home
Cosmic Funnies
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird
oozey mess
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
No title available
Jimmy Eat World
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from United States
seen from Latvia
seen from Argentina
seen from Thailand
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Singapore
seen from Philippines
seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from Netherlands
@raggedy-ann-confessions
hi welcome or something !!!!!!! i just made this cause im autistic but whatever
send raggedy ann related opinions / confessions / etc ! typical confession blog really . no judgement here :D
pls no nsfw ! little jokes are fine but nothing intense cause i am in fact a minor and even if i wasnāt i do not want to be reading that
for the sake of this blog i use she / he pronouns
my main is @ragdoggy if you wanna check that out too (:
do not start arguments in my reblogs
Hey so sorry if this may be an uncomfortable ask feel free to delete it. How can one tell when an artist (or writer if so) ships the raggedy siblings? I've seen a ton of them drawn or written very 'intimately' (sorry for the wording) and then later I found out that a few of them- the artists- ships the siblings, which is yikes! and I know it's hard to tell sometimes because I know that the said siblings are normally very close to each other on screen and in the books. I just wanna look out and carefully not accidentally support another weirdo.
i donāt personally have any advice for this other than maybe look at tags ? it might be tagged with " raggedy ann x raggedy andy " or something adjacent ? maybe someone else has better advice though so iāll leave this one out to the general public
wonāt let me respond to this one so i gotta post a screenshot instead
I'm non-binary
wow !! good for you anon ! iām genderfluid (:
Forgive me Raggedy Ann for I have sinned itās been two months since my last confession
you see I robbed a bank, BUT it was only so I could buy more dolls š„ŗš„ŗš¢(silly)
worth it
ouhhhh i missed the anniversary HAPPY LATE ONE YEAR BIRTHDAY TO THIS STUPID GIMMICK BLOG
im not too deep in the rag dolly fandom i just rlly like musicals and i have mixed opinions on rag dolly as a whole but i am very fascinated by it. i saw an ask on this page abt general d who i also have very mixed opinions on but am curious abt the replies to that post, especially pertaining to my knowledge about other mt villains like the wolf from into the woods. they basically have the exact same traits as a villain but get wildly different reactions on this site and im very curious what the difference is. is it just a fandom thing? is the general raggedy fandom less familiar with mt villains or mt in general? or is there something abt general d specifically im missing? or is it just individual opinions lol. iām going anon bc some of the replies were a bit intense lol
hrmm could possibly just be a raggedy fandom thing ? i havenāt watched into the woods so iām not familiar with the character sorry ):
i really gotta watch that circus thing don't i?
i think only the songs have been discovered so far but theyāre very good i recommend
I find it funny how in the circus version, there actually was going to be a teddy bear that went by the name āTeddyā and it pretty much sort of made a come back thanks to R.A.R.E. Now trust me, I donāt support of the harmful stereotypical stuff that Gibson put to the Panda character in the original musical, especially when it was harmfully portraying Chinese people, but in my opinion, I think it would have been better if they kept the Teddy character instead of just changing it to the panda character. I donāt inherently understand why they changed Teddyās character (from the circus version) to a character that literally is a racist portrayal of Chinese people. I mean hell, if Iām not mistaken, there were I think reviews from people telling how they wanted Gibson to remove or change the panda character because of its obvious harmful portrayal and such but Gibson still kept the character anyway in the musical, which is just really disappointing not just because Gibson seemingly didnāt listen, but also because of the fact that Teddy had to be removed all because of Gibson wanting to write a completely different character. Especially when the character was written in being a literal harmful and racist stereotype against Chinese people. In my opinion, I wished they would have kept the Teddy character and handled him a little better instead of just getting rid of him entirely, but again, Iām happy that R.A.R.E tried attempting in doing something with the character, but again, I still wished the Teddy from the circus version wasnāt removed and would have been part of the rag dolly musical and such. Thatās all I could explain about the Teddy character and such. Again, I donāt support any of Gibsonās writing and portrayal of the panda character Iām just mainly explaining my slight frustration with the way they handled and harmfully portrayed the character. Donāt get me wrong, I love the rag dolly musical i very much do, but when it comes to loving something, you have to understand and know the overall flaws that it has and how you mustnāt ignore it. And trust me, there are some flaws that the musical has but that doesnāt mean that I donāt have a few positives for it. But ya, thatās all I just wanted to discuss on the matter, also sorry if I somehow butchered a few of my writings or something.
!!
Not going anonymous for this one wish me luck guys
I genuinely am uncomfortable with Clandy/Raggedy Andy x Uncle Clem because in some renditions of the dolls, Ann and Andy are portrayed as kids, and Clem as an adult. They also don't just call him Clem, they say Uncle Clem. Before you all get mad at me for that uncle statement, yes, I know they're not actually related. Though you do have to admit that they have a family dynamic in the original books. It's been a prominent ship in the fandom for as long as I've been in the fandom, and I will admit I was a Clandy shipper at some point before I educated myself by doing loads of deep dives on Raggedy Ann and Andy. No hate to anyone who ships them, but it genuinely weirds me out, lol!
!
hi please donāt start arguments in my reblogs i think this is the second time iāve had to say this
rag dolly was good for what it was at an extent, but compared to what little stuff we had from the circus production to me rag dolly at least for the broadway version was such a DRAG bc of how they treat their characters I understand ann is the main character but so is andy, theyre meant to be a duo and in gibson's version they don't express that rrly well AT ALL and andy was just dumb down to be just a sidekick which I hate sm. Like the fact WE HAD CANDY HEARTS AND PAPER FLOWERS BEFORE just really hurts me. Any form of their sibling relationship that was once in the circus production ended up being nuked. And it also made it seem like that bc andy has no heart there's not rrly much to his character like ann other than he likes dynamite and builds a boat which was cool. But their should be more with him. Like I wanted andy to have a relationship with Marcella like ann does. It just seems like nobody except the two main actors never rrly read the books, otherwise they'd andy more differently than what we had. Broadway andy deserves so much better and I could go on and on about my other critiques with the show. But I dont wanna sound like a hater bc I really do love show sm yall I SWEAR
!!
Tiktok Raggedy Ann fans are something... It's a rabbit hole ššš
!!!
10 days
i think people way overreact about general d HEAR ME OUT
i watched some of the new workshop and im glad rare is redirecting the icky feelings to other scenes that donāt involve marcella as much but even in the original version i feel like the ickyness is sort of the point?
maybe itās just me but i always saw him (and the doctors) as a metaphor for capitalism and how death in america is an industry. heās predatory because in america, basically everyone with power preys on you, no matter how vulnerable you are. your suffering makes corporations and politicians and the military and american health insurance companies more money in the long run, and this especially applies to the great depression. (im like 90% sure thatās when rag dolly is but either way it still applies.) we see this today all the time, doesnāt matter who you are or how old you are or if itās fair or not, if youāre dying itās good for the economy. and i rlly think that was intentional on the writers part which is why heās dressed up in army gear but that part is just speculation
anyways i know itās gross to watch but i always thought it was like lowkey genius on the writers part and definitely very clear that it wasnāt something to be celebrated or romanticized. again maybe thatās just me! excited to see what people in the notes think :3
!!
Yes, I know Scott did a great Andy in the theater, but let's give Mark a shout-out as well, he dubbed and acted as Andy, no one has managed to play him twice
"But Rag Dolly is better", I don't care, I just want to hear Mark do Andy again and imagine what it was like
!!!
YOOOOOOOOO WE HAVE THE CIRCUS PRODUCTION AUDIO R.A.R.E FOUND LETS GOOO
yeah !!