Having a bias and a preference in media isn’t a problem if you know you have that. To make it about total drama because that’s my kinda expertise if you will, I love revenge of the island, but dislike pahkitew. I am aware that the Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. I am also aware that revenges writing is generally a lot better in almost every way, but with that in mind I’m able to look at a lot of my critiques for pi and identify it in revenge and criticise it for these issues. I’ve noticed one too many td fans having a bias for their favourite characters or seasons and not being able to critique them well enough. I like Dave. I know Dave’s writing isn’t particularly good. I know Dave’s writing has a lot in common with Trent in action, whom I don’t like. I can also see that Dave was intentional and Trent was not. If you wish for your opinions on this show and media in general to be taken seriously and to be involved in conversations with others that have strong opinions and get theirs taken seriously you need to be able to identify what is your opinion and what is objective. We, as a society actually this isn’t even just a TD thing, but it’s applicable here, but we need to stop the belief that everything is an opinion. Every opinion is equal when someone’s opinion is going against fact. Unfortunately for media analysis not every (analytical*) opinion can be correct. And I think as a fandom and for all fandoms actually the minute we can accept that we can have actually interesting and productive conversations about the media.















