blind mag!

e⠀𓏲⠀rory's intro⠀. . . ⠀they / it⠀⏔⠀🏳️‍⚧️⚧️ ⠀⠀19 y/o⠀𝜗𓏲⠀multifandom ⠀

[s34lpup]

i’m not built for this

[sealdev]

I proclaim that I have nothing to say today.

[s34lpup]

it’s so annoying having a strong need for justice in this day n age. people have no compassion, no morals and no decency. jfc

[s34lpup]

atp i feel like kms would be easier than trying to find my identity

[islandmusic]

Sea bunny 雲見ダイビング

[e-quarium]

༄.°⋆｡˚ Baby Anemone in the waters of Cozumel, Mexico !!

[pngblog]

[bucky-shot]

@fist-full-of-feathers

[pngblog]

[sanguinehaz]

someone should check on lucio

[important-animal-images]

[landsccape]

[teathattast]

This is me btw

[seali]

[fluidoktaiger]

:]

[ririmriram]

eighty-seven oscars for the fnaf 2 movie, peak cinema

[pnglove]

[s34lpup]

let’s remind ourselves that what other people wear is not consent. nor is it a way to depict how many people they’ve slept with, or would like to sleep with.

let’s remind ourselves that just because a person has skin, and shows some of it off, they’re not looking for outside approval. and even if they were, that’s okay.

men thinking women's clothing is "offensive" stems from deeply ingrained societal views rooted in the patriarchy, where feminine bodies and choices are policed. saying someone is wearing “offensive clothing” is linking femininity with sexuality, and viewing women's bodies as inherently sexualized objects to be controlled or judged, more than as expressions of personal autonomy. this policing, even when done out of “love”, is often disguised as a concern for modesty and reflects a desire to maintain patriarchal hierarchies, punishing women for appearing too sexual or not sexual enough. it stems from the belief that women's bodies are for male consumption or control, making clothing and self expression a tool for reinforcing subordination.