A reminder of what Judge Wilken did, and didn’t, say
People really don’t understand the ruling in the O’Bannon case.  I’ve heard dozens of people describe it as being a mandate that all schools start paying their athletes $5,000 in deferred name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments as of next year, unless the ruling is overturned.
Let me try to be super-clear about this.  Judge Wilken’s order requires no school to do anything it doesn’t want to do.  If Notre Dame wants to offer its recruits a scholarship to Notre Dame as it has in the past, and doesn’t want to offer to cover their cost of attendance (COA) and doesn’t want to offer them any NIL money, whether up-front or deferred, nothing in Judge Wilken’s order prevents them from doing just that.  The same holds for any other school.
Here’s what she said, with some ellipses and emphasis just to help you work through the verbiage.
Keep reading
good summary of what the ncaa lost in the o’bannon trail












