Saw a headcanon about a character being transfem which is ofc beautiful but it was a whole long post with evidence that this is the logical conclusion and the evidence was like… this character acts submissively and is implied to have been the victim of sexual violence. Um
Idk maybe I’m being ungenerous here but like “o think this character is a woman and the narrative exploring some of the sexual trauma and dynamics that can coincide with that” ≠ “having sexual trauma and being submissive makes you a woman. because those are Woman Things” and the post did not really do anything to not be the second take













