absolute theatrical self-consiousness
my hand shakes when i'm nervous. the only exception is karaoke. but maybe thats because of the shot of tequila i chased with a $2 beer.
i am extremely self-conscious. people might not know this about me because i do a good job at covering it. at least i think i do. unless i have a crush on someone and then the levy breaks. and then i write about it in my journal.
what i love about performance is the chance to confront my instincts. and to embrace this self-consciousness. why waste time trying to pretend i have easy confidence when what excites me about life are the times I'm most afraid? i used to hate that my hand shakes. and now i kind of like it. it lets the audience see me. the real me. not this amazing actor i secretly want them to see.
i often think of performing as a way of pretending. of creating these intricate veils that keep the audience from seeing the person playing the role. there are times when i desperately want to be the kind of actor that is unrecognizable on stage.
i have great respect for actors that can transform.
but i am fascinated by an approach to performance that creates ways of letting people in rather than formulates veils to block them out.
recently i became interested in autobiographical work. which i realize has the potential for narcissism, and is perhaps overdone. the first thing i think of when i hear "solo-autobiographical-performance" is that episode in FRIENDS when they all trick Chandler into going to see the one woman show. and the woman's first line is:
"CHAPTER 1: MY FIRST PERIOD..."
but what an interesting way to enter a story - through your own understanding of how you are evolving.
thinking about autobiographical work brought me to questions about the act of keeping a journal. why do we - those of us who keep journals - keep journals? who are we writing too? who are we performing for? are these journal entries extensions of our exploding minds, or are they fabrications of the people we wish to be? are we writing to our future selves? i know that's why i keep a journal. but i also know, deep down - and i'm a bit embarrassed to admit this - that i am writing to whoever will read my journals once i'm dead. and that these journal entries will somehow be a key to the truth of me. my journals will be the anchor for those that grieve the loss of me, and the answer for those who ever questioned my existence. pretty epic, right? and yet i'd be mortified if anyone found my journals and read them while i was still alive.
journal keeping seems a tad...well...adolescent. the more i talk about it, the more childish i feel projecting so much importance onto this form of writing. but when i have gone back and read my old journals, and when i was reading the journal entries from the people who so generously submitted their own a couple months ago, i felt...well to put it in the cheesiest way possible...chills. i felt chills.
and i also felt uncomfortable.
is that because these journal entries were written in the private confines of a moleskin? how private can such a tactile object remain? i mean, who are we - the freaks that keep the journals - kidding?
i then realized how intimately and how freely i was engaging with other people's accounts of their own past. and how unnatural that felt. it was like i was looking through my parent's underwear drawer.
what is having a journal about?
what is having a past about?
and what does it mean to offer another human being permission into your personal interaction with your past?
the past does many things. it hovers. it roots. it sneaks up on you. it gets buried. and then it climbs out of the packed dirt. and it comforts. and it sits in the backseat and lets you pick the radio station. it is a reminder. and a reference point. it is anxiety. and it is honesty. it is betrayal. the past is distorted. it is a mirror. but more like a funhouse mirror, or those gawd-awful mirrors in department store dressing rooms. it is the fuel. it is hand cramps when your mind is racing but your pen is running out of ink. it is secrets. it is the first draft. it is a void. it is a glint. a soft shadow. a peephole. it is your own imagination.
please excuse my lack of brevity.
i am both captivated by and captive of my past.
i am grateful for the opportunity to peer into the written accounts of other's.
what is more intimate than a visceral connection to someone else's absolute theatrical self-consciousness?