ellievsbear
izzy's playlists!
official daine visual archive
noise dept.
gracie abrams
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn
NASA
Claire Keane
untitled
Monterey Bay Aquarium
if i look back, i am lost
Mike Driver
@theartofmadeline
No title available
almost home
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
trying on a metaphor
pixel skylines
seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@sendthemdownthehalltoroll
here's two articles about how JK Rowling just posted on X an upskirt photo of Freda Wallace, a transgender woman, after deadnaming her and misgendering her repeatedly online.
The wealthy author escalated a social media spat that resulted in posting a photo from a 2023 event at the Institute of Economic Affairs in
Rowling posted the picture taken from below because the trans woman, she said, was "refusing to debate me."
Thank you for posting without the fucking destiel meme
“I was on a strict diet during Episode VIII, and she was like, ‘Kid, get into that fridge and take some chocolate bars. I have many there.’ And I did,” he recalls. “I failed my diet because Carrie Fisher told me to. And it [felt] great.”
-John Boyega on Carrie Fisher
This is the Carrie Fisher post of body positivity reblog for a chocolate bar from her fridge
Must've been hard as hell in the day-to-day
Frodo: I just felt like I was really locked in … idk
Sam:
Getting notes on this post is like …. Girls you might be in burnout. Sorry I can’t help. 😘 though
stop calling it a girl dinner and call it by its formal name: Fend For Yourself dinner in an ingredients household
i love writing out numbers and then putting them in parentheses like "one (1)" even when i dont need to i think its funny
don’t leave out the best part
I’ve never seen the second photo before.
The parking attendant paused by the double-length bay. Intended for mobile homes and cars with trailers, it was currently occupied by a sleeping dragon.
No parts of it extended beyond the lines, and the paper ticket was clearly displayed, impaled on a horn.
The parking attendant moved on.
I was going to just queue it for later but then it stuck in my brain, and I decided to make it everyone's problem
looking. at you
watching an old disney movie
inspired by the comments in this video making me aware of the siamese cat scene in aristocats
Abandoned Planetarium (Pink Planet House) Solnechnoye Sanatorium. Leningrad Region, Russia
Lenproekt, 1965
excellent prev tags
i love the design of this building :O
A true story of something that happened to me at a con a few years ago! I just couldn't believe that bag saldjaldjalkd!!!
living under a rock is so fun i love watching a movie that’s been famous for decades and being like wow this is so good.. did you guys know about this
Truncated text of tweet from MrPitBull, Mar 11, 2026:
She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history.
Yale University, 1969.
Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was one of very few women in her program.
Every Friday afternoon, students and faculty gathered for beers and informal conversation. One week, Margaret asked a simple question: "Were there ever any women scientists?"
The faculty answered firmly: No.
Someone mentioned Marie Curie. The group dismissed it—her husband Pierre really deserved the credit.
Margaret didn't argue. But she also didn't believe them.
So she started looking.
She found a reference book called "American Men of Science"—essentially a Who's Who of scientific achievement. Despite the title, she was shocked to discover it contained entries about women. Botanists trained at Wellesley. Geologists from Vermont.
There were names. There were credentials. There were careers.
The professors had been wrong.
But Margaret's discovery was just the beginning. Because as she dug deeper into archives across the country, she found something far more disturbing.
Photograph after photograph showed women standing at laboratory benches, working with equipment, listed on research teams.
But when she read the published papers, the award citations, the official histories—those same women had disappeared. Their names were missing. Their contributions erased.
It wasn't random. It was systematic.
Women who designed experiments watched male colleagues publish results without giving them credit. Women whose discoveries were assigned to supervisors. Women listed in acknowledgments instead of as authors. Women passed over for awards that went to male collaborators who contributed far less.
Margaret realized she was witnessing a pattern that stretched across centuries.
Women had always been present in science. The record had simply pushed them aside.
She needed a name for what she was documenting.
In the early 1990s, she found it in the work of Matilda Joslyn Gage—a 19th-century suffragist who had written about this exact phenomenon in 1870.
In 1993, Margaret published a paper formally naming it: The Matilda Effect.
The term captured something that had been hidden in plain sight for generations. Once you knew the term, you saw it everywhere.
Her dissertation became a lifelong mission.
For more than 30 years, Margaret researched and wrote her landmark three-volume series: Women Scientists in America. She examined letters, institutional policies, individual careers. She gathered undeniable evidence that women in science had been consistently under-credited and structurally excluded.
Her work faced resistance. Many dismissed women's history as political rather than academic. Others insisted she was exaggerating.
Margaret didn't argue emotionally. She presented data. Documented cases. Patterns repeated across decades and institutions.
Eventually, the evidence became undeniable.
Her research helped restore recognition to scientists who had been erased:
Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray work revealed DNA's structure—credit went to Watson and Crick.
Lise Meitner, who explained nuclear fission—omitted from the Nobel Prize.
Nettie Stevens, who discovered sex chromosomes—received little credit.
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who discovered stars are made of hydrogen—initially dismissed.
And countless others whose names had nearly vanished.
Margaret changed the narrative. Science was no longer just the story of solitary male geniuses. It became a story of collaboration that included women who had been written out.
The Matilda Effect became standard terminology. Scholars used it to examine how credit is assigned, how authors are listed, who receives awards, who gets left out.
I think I've said this before but even if the Doctor was real and I somehow met them, I wouldn't be a companion. At most my brother would be a companion and I would get to hear so many outrageous stories about adventures he went on while I'm chilling at home like. Ok. Cool. Not quite sure you're not making this all up but also there's no reason for you to be making this up so um. Yeah. Cool. Maybe I would get to go on one pity adventure or accidental adventure though.
Do you think you would be a companion in a universe where Doctor Who is real AND you meet the Doctor?
yes!
no, but I might know one of the companions
no.
nuance?
doesn't matter how realistic it is, but what do you feel deep in your soul?
you should have seen me a couple of years ago!
