One Fits ALL
The focus that Alfie Kohn presents in the article, âThe perils of âGrowth Mindsetâ education: why weâre trying to fix our kids when we should be fixing the systemâ published by SALON on Sunday, August 16th 2015, is based on the flaws of the âGrowth Mindsetâ and how it should be implemented or questioned. Kohn explains how the issues with growth mindset is that students are still distracted by what grade there getting instead of what they are doing to either get the grade or do better. Although, Kohn believes that Growth Mindset is there only to help âfix the studentsâ instead of changing the school systems curriculum, Carol Dweck the Author of âCarol Dweck Revisits Growth Mindsetâ researched how those who adopt a growth mindset, helps them [students] have better self-esteem when it comes to approaching challenging idea. It is said that the more you believe you can do it and surpass a bump in the road the more you are susceptible to the idea that appraisal through approval of effort works more than having a âfixed mindsetâ and praising intelligence. Kohnâs major issue with Dweckâs research is that too much importance on performance can drown out the learning prosses and learning can be also affected by social environments around and in school.
In Kohnâs article, he gives an example that explains how students whose self-worth and esteem is measured by their performance face the chance of failing and according to this study those who do adopt a growth mindset, give themselves more of an excuse for failing at something, than those with the âdreadedâ fixed mindset. The study calls it âself-handicapping.â
What Kohn is trying to explain in his article is that, even though everyone seems to acclaim Carol Dweckâs research there is still some flaws. He believes that to truly achieve a better system in school, you should start with the curriculums instead of trying to change the studentsâ mindsets. His discussion about the perils of growth mindset are agreeable because, we do not live in a society in which the size âone fits allâ is true. To comply with the masses, you must be able to understand the way people think, I believe that Dweckâs research is great but Kohnâs idea on fixing the system first then the students applies better with going against the âone fits allâ idea.
When responding to Kohnâs argument, you seem to agree with both Dweckâs research about the âgrowthâ mindset and Kohnâs main concept. You specifically state, âI believe that Dweckâs research is great but Kohnâs idea on fixing the system first then the students applies better with going against the âone fits allâ idea.â In other words, you are stating that the systemâs corruption should be prioritized before the mindsets of the individuals who are inevitably dealing with its many faults, including the âone size fits allâ concept, which I find similar in comparison to the analogy of forcing fish to climb trees and run for miles, seeing as both address the idea of forcing all individuals with very different skills and interests to conform to the one same process of education. You seem to agree with Dweck, but also agree with Kohnâs point of looking to the system and acknowledging its corruption as well as fixing its faults first. I agree with this standpoint, especially since most individuals will deal with the system their entire lives, regardless of their mindset. Although I do believe that teaching individuals how to be the best version of themselves will help the overall society as a whole since we are starting with each individual, thereâs only so much one can do to succeed if the world that they have to live in and the system that they will always have to deal with is improperly designed, and if anything its corruption and flaws work against most individuals who donât fit the generic cookie cutter that has been created.Â












