I answered Yes, to the first, and No to the second, as someone who is Pro-Choice.
But also: As someone who is congenitally disabled, I feel another dimension to this:
Women who are pressured / coerced / misinformed into having an abortion (by their doctors, family members, Society-at-Large), because a prenatal test has shown that the baby will be born with a Disability (often Down Syndrome, and related chromosomal intellectual disabilities).
This is reason for abortion is normalized in our society, and doesn't raise the same shock value as the idea of aborting a fetus based on sex chromosomal differences.
But Pro-Choice cuts both ways.
I've seen the argument made (rhetorically) to disabled pro-choicers: Well, if your mother had known you were going to be disabled, she might have aborted you. So how can you be pro-choice?
Speaking for myself: If my mother had known ahead of time that I was going to be disabled, and if she had felt that she couldn't, or simply didn't want, to raise me, I would rather have been aborted than be either: born into a family who didn't want me, or thrown into the institutional system of adoption where my life would be undervalued because of my disability.
As it was, my mother was advised, by a doctor, to institutionalize me when I was two years old, and my disability was first diagnosed. Instead, she fought to keep me.
It was over two decades after her death that I learned that my mother had a good dozen of family members living very nearby/in my childhood neighborhood -- and I never heard her even whisper of their existence. And I can't help but wonder if she cut off all contact with them because they agreed with the doctor that I should have been given up.
If my mother had given birth to me because she'd been coerced, I wouldn't have the warm and confident feeling that I was her chosen daughter.