It is so, so important to accept and absorb that other people can, will, and do enjoy fiction in other ways to you.
I keep seeing posts FURIOUS that some readers need to find at least some character in a text relatable in order to enjoy the book, INSISTING that 'YOU' can enjoy books where everyone is horrible if you really apply yourself.
No. NO. YOU can enjoy that. I can't. I have a PhD and an Eng Lit degree and what you need to absorb - what you really need to absorb - is that a book that you personally do not like can have value.
When someone tells you that THEY need to relate to at least one character to enjoy the book, they are not saying that a book CANNOT BE ENJOYABLE, by SOMEONE, they are telling you their personal preferences. Which are valid.
Here are just some of the works I have no trouble admitting have value that I do not like at all:
Wuthering Heights
Ulysses
Robinson Crusoe
Mrs Dalloway
Le Morte d'Arthur
These are not bad books, although we can surely engage in literary critique about them. They are all, in fact, important books. I completely understand why we study them and agree that we should continue to do so.
I don't like them.
That says nothing about whether or not YOU are able to enjoy them and enjoy the things that made me nope out.
You have GOT to embrace the fact that not everyone has to be able to enjoy the things you do in order to be capable of understanding, analysing, or even just talking about them.
It is not a moral or intellectual failing to not like certain types of book. Nor does it imply that you are criticising those who do like those books.
Grow up.
I won't lie the only book I ever read that bored me enough to put me directly to sleep was: "To Kill A Mockingbird "
And ive read much longer books with much less acclaim.

















