Bootstrap Strategy: Choice or Necessity in the World of Limited Venture Capital Funding
In the world of growing companies, startups and entrepreneurship and innovation, one burning question always sparks heated debates: to bootstrap or to raise venture capital (VC) funding? Is it like choosing between driving a sleek sports car or cruising in a private jet? These options come with their own set of pros and cons.
While VC funding can provide significant financial resources and support, it is not always attainable for every founding team of growing company (start up or SME or corporate venture). Whether it is a consequence of limited availability of VC funding or by choice entrepreneurs or innovators within a large growing company turn to bootstrapping as an alternative means of funding their ventures. So is bootstrapping a strategic choice or simply a consequence of failure to raise venture capital money? Based on our experience and the experience of the leadership teams of our clients, we dig a little deeper, and explore the dynamics between bootstrapping and venture capital funding.
We do not cover the various alternative funds of financing beyond Venture Capital in this article. The pressures of venture capital funding
Venture capital firms play a crucial role in providing financial backing to early-stage startups. But here's the catch: founders who take the path of VC funding often face immense pressure to deliver results. Picture this: VCs have their own rulebook of success. Founders in funded path see the pressure initially low but while scaling they face pressure till there is “success” as defined by the mandate of the VC firms .
The stakes are sky-high, and the pressure cooker is always on. Imagine the relentless stress of constantly striving to meet predetermined benchmarks, with the weight of expectations bearing down on your every move. In today's startup landscape, many VC-funded companies find themselves facing tougher situations than ever before. It's a high stakes balancing act that separates the resilient from the rest. The Bootstrapping alternative
In the vast landscapes of startup or venture builder ecosystems, certain regions, like Eastern Europe, face a scarcity of venture capital funds. There, a fascinating phenomenon unfolds: a remarkable 30% of fintech startups in this region find themselves embracing the audacious path of bootstrapping, far surpassing the European average of 7%. What does this tell us? It showcases the resilience and resourcefulness of founders who refuse to be held back by the lack of VC funding. But, it also indicates that founders are turning to bootstrapping as a viable alternative when unable to secure VC funding. When faced with continuous rejections from investors, some founders begin to realize that their time and financial resources are better spent on building their product rather than constantly pitching to investors.
Bootstrapping becomes a bold decision to take control of their vision and build the company with minimal funding. However, it appears that this choice is typically made as a result of a limited availability of venture capital funding.
Click here to read the full article -
Get inspired: Success stories of Bootstrapped companies