my double tarnish was made for this š©

ellievsbear

No title available
šŖ¼
Game of Thrones Daily
Sade Olutola
Cosimo Galluzzi
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
š
$LAYYYTER
EXPECTATIONS
taylor price
The Bowery Presents

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
NASA

oozey mess

Andulka
Claire Keane
almost home
Interview Vampire Daily
Fai_Ryy
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Bolivia
seen from Peru

seen from Mexico
seen from Estonia
seen from Peru
seen from Argentina

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Peru

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@snartiefr
my double tarnish was made for this š©
technically a FR dragon, but also just a really cool design. doodle of eearz's seraph
new watermark because this went on my bsky
I will say the differences between merrigan and the background fathoms are so so weird.
blue's mouth looks so much more beak-like than merrigan's. merrigan's jaw is far rounder than the other fathoms. her neck is fatter than theirs. and his arm is also much more bogsneak-like. it's so jarring!! and god knows what the fathoms' actual pose art would look like. I guess that's just what happens when you have 3 entirely different styles for different site art lol.
HOW ARE ALL OF THESE THE SAME DRAGON BREED. goodbye
Everyone...... go Look at Jorus!!!
[Thank you kindly to @cecils-dragons for the PERFECT skin for this little beastie!]
Ahhh! My heart!!!! I love Jorus so much, little guyās making amazing art!!!!
Commission for a user on flight rising!
what's the flight rising art direction post?? I used to play that game
for everyone who doesn't know flight rising is a virtual pet site ala neopets, but with dragons. On its forums I made a thread pointing out that the dragon designs were becoming relatively more "same face" over time, with similar face shapes and often with a similar "noodly" anatomy my point being that they were both losing some of the charm of a lot of the animals they were based on (with bug, bird, and eel inspired dragons all looking somewhat similar and mammalian), and even more pertinently, not allowing for a wide variety of body types for user characters in the game - with most of the gameplay being a dressup/character creator, you see why having very few buff, chubby, stocky, etc character designs is a pretty big downside. These are the dragons released in the first half of the website's history, with the shapes outlined:
(these pairs are the same species but have somewhat different body shapes, so they were both outlined) And these are the dragons released recently. The stockier guy on the bottom left is the very oldest of these:
I also pointed out several of these designs have very similar faces, relative to the facial variety you could have with dragon designs (other two recent guys are outlined above):
In comparison, here's some of the head shapes from earlier dragon designs:
and yeah I think you can see what I mean about the shape language getting a bit more homogeneous. I expressed that I felt like the art team may have observed the popularity of the thinner, doglike dragons in comparison to the chubby reptilian ones and decided to err towards the former.
I also drew some dragons to better get across my point about shape language when people suggested I was failing to account for the fact that the "sameface" dragons weren't entirely identical:
(obviously I'm exaggerating shapes for clarity of point; clarifying here as some people believed I was knocking the art style and wanted it to be more cartoonish...) I also pointed out that you could easily draw very identifiable fanart of two breeds which people were saying looked different:
(someone told me these didn't read as fanart of either dragon. you be the judge, I guess) I did get a lot of very nice comments, both in agreement and disagreement, but also some comments that I was being disingenuous, arrogant, or (much more dishearteningly) suggesting that fat designs are simply too unappealing and that the artists can't waste their time on it because the website is a business.
yesterday they released a sneak peak at their newest dragons, which people believe are cetacean inspired. I tuned in as the initial preview (which only featured an arm) made it look pretty stocky:
but, shocker:
ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
my uncle who works at flight rising let me log into the top secret test server to see the upcoming anniversary update!!!!!! yeehaw!!
Mitya my Veilspun!!!! šš
sketch of my new pearlcatcher
The Black Sun
my collection. i love fucked up dogs im the #1 fan of fucked up dogs
The whole transandrophobia/transmisandry fight is so cyclical. People will be like āitās not misandry trans men face, cause misandry isnāt real. If anything what you experience is misogyny.ā Ohhhh so itās an intersection of transphobia and misogyny? Is there a word for that? And then people race to say āno no no thatās not what I meant. Trans men donāt face transmisogyny.ā Why? Either they do and you donāt wanna let them use that word because reasons, or they DONT and need to come up with a new word to describe their unique experiencesā¦ā¦which they didā¦
Like ultimately transmisogyny means either simply the intersection of transphobia and misogyny, in which case every trans person who faces misogyny and transphobia intersections are āāapplicableāā and the term isnāt specific to trans women, OR
Transmisogyny is the intersection of misogyny and transphobia that is specifically directed at trans women and transfemmes in which case other trans people are still potential victims of it if not the intended target, but then the types of misogyny directed at trans men/transmascs needs a different word.
Transmisogyny as a term also isnāt generally assumed to include the types of antimasculism trans women/transfemmes face, so either the word DOES include that because itās specific to the the PEOPLE or there is a gap in the language even for trans women. Transandrophobia as a label seeks to call attention to how antimasculism impacts trans men, but frankly it impacts trans women too!
So there are instances of misogyny that are targeted at trans men that doesnāt have language and there are instances of antimasculism that are directed at trans women that arenāt really talked about either.
Itās not a āwho-has-it-worseā pissing contest and expanding language doesnāt steal from anyone. There are missing pieces of the discourse and nuance only helps us understand everyoneās situation better. Trans men and trans women are united under trans experience, and transphobes attack trans people using whatever gendered rhetoric will hurt them worse.
And for the rest of US who are not trans men or trans women, who ALSO are united with yāall under the experience of transphobia, WE are gonna get hit with the rhetoric of whichever way people think we are trans. There is no chasm between these two experiences, it is a venn diagram of overlap that doesnāt stop at āmisgenderingā being all thatās in the middle.
Majestic and clever and hardworking, the... [checks smudged whiteboard] sandskink
such is
Miz Llyr for Agkistrodon. She eternally weeps for the home that, for all her power, she could not save..
This was incredibly fun: SKULLS and BIG OLE TEARS. I am swooning
Day Twenty, Marbled gene. Marble on banescales is gorgeous, I really wish the modern gene held up to what the banes got.
@dragonaday-fr