Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Mike Driver
cherry valley forever
Love Begins
Sweet Seals For You, Always
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
blake kathryn
NASA
will byers stan first human second
occasionally subtle
taylor price
almost home
YOU ARE THE REASON
祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Sade Olutola
ojovivo
PR's Tumblrdome
seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Netherlands
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Belarus
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Saudi Arabia
@sp0-0ks
“1950s horror movies contrast radically with their 1940s predecessors. understandably – they were reflecting a whole new world. audiences wanted stories that connected directly to their lives, to the ever-expanding technology in their homes and workplaces. they also wanted horror movies that played to their fears – stoked by politicians – of the shadows that lay beyond their immediate, personal experience of the shiny american dream (applies to some of these movies).”
THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE tobe hooper, 1974
Nintendo 3DS Guide at the Louvre
Jennifer Tilly as Tiffany in Bride of Chucky (1998)
source
Waves and Time.
An artwork by Chris Drury inspired by the ice and water that shaped the landscape, incorporates a dewpond. Yorkshire Wolds, England.
Could u please do a tutorial on torture 👀
OH. YEAH I CAN DO THAT
— CHILD’S PLAY (1988)
Lionel from Animal Crossing: New Leaf
Lionel from Animal Crossing: New Leaf
https://instagr.am/p/CeQ-52XMH16/
that crunchy vibe that 70s/80s movies have that modern movies simply cannot capture… that kind of quiet empty vibe to em that can be played for either bleakness or a peaceful energy… why do all modern movies (even the great and pretty ones) feel overproduced after watching an older film. what is it I can’t put my finger on it but it’s there I can feel it
Shot on film
No digital colour grading (today’s films are horribly over processed)
No in-the-computer composite layered scenes with virtual sets etc.
practical sets and effects
hand painted mattes / hand animated vfx
You used the light you had instead of endlessly tweaking it
Sociologically, people stopped going to movies as much in the late 1960s / early 70s because television had really taken off, the era of the ‘tv movie’ started, so studios greenlit a lot of low budget auteur films that had to focus on meaning & relationships instead of spectacle.
8. Pacing.
This is the biggest thing, and it’s not even something most people will even realize they’re noticing. Movies became more uniform in their structure, as hollywood found the “formula” for a hit movie. It means you lose quiet, peaceful scenes that don’t fit into the pattern. That uniformity has done more to hurt the emotional tone of films than any visual effects tricks.
If you’ve gone to the movies recently, you may have felt a strangely familiar feeling: You’ve seen this movie before. Not this exact movie,
In 2005, Blake Snyder released a book: Save the Cat! It discussed movie “beats” and and gave an outline for movie pacing.
That outline has been followed like it’s religious dogma for the majority of Hollywood movies ever since. It’s enough that you can literally count the minutes in movies and say “ok, here comes the antagonist’s big move.”
it’s not just pacing but also average shot length (sometimes shortened to “ASL,” but not to be confused with american sign language.) a movie that only cuts every 12 seconds is gonna feel drastically different from a movie that cuts every 2.5 seconds.
