oh yeah right one more thing actually before there are NO MORE OutOfCharacter posts.
there are going to be some mature themes present here in the future. if you are below the age of 16, i ask that you jump ship now. please. ))
Cosmic Funnies
EXPECTATIONS
YOU ARE THE REASON
NASA

ellievsbear
Misplaced Lens Cap
will byers stan first human second
untitled
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

@theartofmadeline

Andulka

Origami Around
Claire Keane

pixel skylines

if i look back, i am lost
Show & Tell
sheepfilms
🪼
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from South Korea

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Greece
seen from India

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from South Korea

seen from Syria
@splendid-splendiferous
oh yeah right one more thing actually before there are NO MORE OutOfCharacter posts.
there are going to be some mature themes present here in the future. if you are below the age of 16, i ask that you jump ship now. please. ))
is there anyone you regret saving
CALL-IN AGAINST AGE VERIFICATION!
In internet censorship news, the US House of Representatives is doing a markup on a package of bills relating to mandatory age verification online this week (As of 3/1/2026), these bills including the infamous KOSA and the App Store Accountability Act.
To make a very long story short, these bills would force everyone to use their IDs on huge swathes of the net and basically be the end of online privacy and, due to potential prohibitive costs of age verification, likely the end of the indieweb too; even after it's trying to pull itself up from the hole it's been stuck in.
It's not going for a full vote until after markup, but if we can stop it there, we should.
Here is a list of the members of the committee marking this bill up, each of their pages has contact info on it, it's worth calling them all if you can, but especially if they're in your district (Or you can convincingly lie that they are) because this affects us all.
Here's a call script provided by the Stop Internet Censorship Discord, if you need it, but either way light up those phones over the week, because holy fuck, do we need to kill these bills if we want to save the open web.
Because. what they were planning on doing to Discord, they want to do to everywhere, where we cannot escape it.
We cannot let that happen...
Do you do any charity work?
Question: Have you met, or fought against Fliqpy before? He's Flippy's 'alter ego/Hyde Side.'
Splendid. Why do you sparkle? Is it cuz you’re pretty?
WAIT IS THAT FUCKING NUTBOY
Is nobody going to ask if flaky is okay?
you know what, actually, i trust you guys to trust me on this. i dont need to make the whole next chapter before i post it. i can do like I've been doing
bleeeh
Now that other question got me wondering, will we ever see Splendid in his civilian disguise?
(Either way i've already got a few doods of him in it so. Teehee)
ahhh, now THAT i'm still on the fence about. the entire premise of this blog is that he's interacting with the public for a very specific reason, and i mean the IN CHARACTER public. So trying to squeeze in an appearance of his secret identity HERE would be really really tricky.
however.. ive already made a partner blog for this one, that'll be getting its debut soon, from another perspective. and you MIGHT see him in civvie garb there.
I WOULD also like to say that the story i'm telling is character driven. It's going to LOOK like a token story about heroes and villains sometimes, but i promise that's just the horse the real plot rides in on. just so you all know, in case it starts going a direction you weren't quite expecting. there are going to be a LOT of non-canon characters, but a lot of canons as well.))
Will there be references to episodes from HTF, that splendid was apart of, like the convention, or the laundromat?
((plenty of them. in fact, one or two references end up having plot-moving consequences.))
i gotta get these next few posts done before i post any of them, cause otherwise they wont work how i want them to. so stand by.))
in replies what is he looking at wrong answers only