⭐️

sprinkle - 20 - he/she/they ic: digineetpack

[sprinklefluffs]

boyfriend wanted me to make a self-insert to ship with sly, so we hacked carl up into bits (sorgy) and made this new guy! treyden kards! lalalaaa :3

[bloodbitts-blog]

That is a powerful beast

[sprinklefluffs]

thank you.. they are indeed >:3

[sprinklefluffs]

forgot to post my new fursona ref!

[chaosblast]

remember when you go to sleep someone desires to rape you and maybe one day it'll happen. Your head can be smashed and blood pouring from your jaw, teeth shattered after the beating. I hope you envision yourself being fucked senseless 2 nite. maybe your little boy-toy would also like it, like how his siblings touched him. do you like being touched, Nick?

[modpollyblog]

i keep seeing people argue over if kittycorn made certain ocs or not so here's a post where i try to find as many character credits as i can. under the cut so if people want to reblog there isn't 5 miles of text. if i missed something please tell me.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

here's a link to a long list of characters that are NOT created/owned by kittycorn. i don't know if it's every character not owned by her but it seems to be pretty extensive. please don't be shitty and redesign/claim characters owned by other people. my post is long enough so i'm not listing them all here like i am with the other ones.

from chaosblast on behalf of the owner of boxa caken funfetti, lee pinata heere, and faerie bread confetti.

the owner: "Idk if I want my current username involved without someone having to dig for it, but you can tell them I don't want the characters involved with sparklecare or Getty and that I also created Faerie and dont like what became of him or want him involved either"

chaos: "funfetti and pinata, similar to harts (the original design for puppy), are based on plushies the creator owns- they even have their names written on their tags. so you can imagine how upsetting it is to see people try to take them as their own- ESPECIALLY faerie, considering kc's friend RJ now uses him as a sona when he belongs to someone else (and wasn't even originally named faerie!!!!)"

faerie was credited to being created/owned by bonefruits (rj) on kittycorn's now deleted toyhouse. rj does not own faerie.

from gusherbug about brake no harts (link from sparklearchive, as the original post has been deleted).

"wait i really wanna make sure it's clear what my wishes are as the original creator of harts (puppy), sorry if i'm talking too much

on the left is harts. please do not include her in rewrites or try to make her your oc. harts is the character i made for the comic that was recolored and renamed after i left.

on the right is puppy. puppy is the current version of this character, recolored and renamed. i do not consider puppy to be my oc, i only consider harts as mine"

from kittykittycatnip's post about its past sparklecare contributions.

"please don’t steal these last few characters, i’m still actively using them in my own story completely unrelated to sparklecare"

Nerva Smiley

Brody/Bowie "Bo" Dacious

Sugar E. Sweet

Ty D. N. Neet

Dande E. Treet

Carter W. Heelie

Justine Thyme

Ellis Dee

from anonymous-sparklecarer's closing remarks post.

kittycorn DOES NOT own these characters. these characters have been specifically asked by their creators to not be used by the fandom.

Dr Harts (Brake No Harts)

Rem Elle Dies

Jean Errie

Jeanne Errie - Jean's mother

Kathy Leet

Jesse T. Dolly

Nurse Care - Hospital actor in volume 3

Maddie Jest Dies

Susey Peggle

Chloe Philly

Tony Boxx

Geoffrey Oh Duh

Walter 'Wally' Coller

Grim 'Grimmy' Sum Blud

Jake Peggle

from scarchiveblog about nightstars.

kittycorn DOES own:

lilith "lily" pittstop

claire wolfe

mackezie "kenzie" web

flan fick

cosmo naught

winston message

virgil pet

kittycorn DOES NOT own:

geoffrey oh duh (chaos)

walter "wally" coller (chaos)

grim "grimmy" sum blud (chaos)

max iffy gent (rj)

soapy sudds (rj)

matt ronnie dazzle (cinnamon)

perry o'feign (cinnamon)

carter w. heelie (gabe)

brody/bowie "bo" dacious (gabe)

justine thyme (gabe)

from sparkleobserver about team escapees/karmageddeon.

kittycorn DOES own:

Kit/maybe Elsa "Ellie" Tronix

Lavender/Lav Ender

Kira/Calendra Ender

Socks/Keith It Together

Pepper/Pep Rika

Franz/Frans Tick

Candle/Candle Abra

Ollie/Neil G. Aterr

simon (previously known as eight bit/casey) has given permission for people to redesign orange u. glad on his tumblr despite the character being owned by him and not kittycorn. he's made it pretty clear he never wants to talk about sparklecare ever again so i've taken screenshots of his answers for proof instead of linking the posts so nobody bothers him. i figured i would bring this up so nobody using orange is harassed.

[sprinklefluffs]

psst,,, im not too good with this support stuff but uh i wanted to draw art for you n chaos since he rlly cant seem to ever catch a break,, i hope theyre doinf better since leaving this shitsjow behind

AGH IM SO SORRY I HAVENT BEEN ON TUMBLR MUCH. TYSM!!! THIS IS LITERALLY SO ADORABLE AND I LOVE IT 😿😿 WE BOTH DO !!! slyden forever and ever...

[chaosblast]

Is It Bad I Got Into Sprite Zero Because Of Sly-

no thats good actually the propaganda is working

[sprinklefluffs]

anon is this you

[chaosblast]

just want to clear the air, the idea that the ventblog server apparently had archive moles came from me and it's just a misunderstanding. i said this to mod polly in dms the night everything happened.

i meant freakycare moles, i did not have moles in the ventblog server, the archive server did not have moles in the ventblog server, nor would we want to. the archive server is completely dead at the current moment ever since Stuff happened and i had to leave it.

i knew at least one mole we had banned was in the ventblog server but i definitely suspected there to be more with how many times archive had to be locked down due to suspicion. people misunderstood me and panicked. i'm very sorry for not being clearer in my wording here. which is why i'm clearing it up now, as i had no idea this misinterpretation occured until someone attempted to attack me using the false information.

i'm also sorry i keep having to make lengthy public posts but all my methods of communication are closed off.

[anonymous-sparklecarer]

I can confirm this as in my correspondence to Mod Polly I respectfully asked they not share any of our DMs going forward to the ventcord as they did so without my consent when I explicitly asked things to stay between us prior. This was due to the fact that we were tipped off about potential moles from the pro Kittycorn side being in the ventcord from someone who was in it. No one in the archive server was in the ventcord and nothing from the ventcord was ever posted to the archive server by anyone.

[chaosblast]

just want to clear the air, the idea that the ventblog server apparently had archive moles came from me and it's just a misunderstanding. i said this to mod polly in dms the night everything happened.

i meant freakycare moles, i did not have moles in the ventblog server, the archive server did not have moles in the ventblog server, nor would we want to. the archive server is completely dead at the current moment ever since Stuff happened and i had to leave it.

i knew at least one mole we had banned was in the ventblog server but i definitely suspected there to be more with how many times archive had to be locked down due to suspicion. people misunderstood me and panicked. i'm very sorry for not being clearer in my wording here. which is why i'm clearing it up now, as i had no idea this misinterpretation occured until someone attempted to attack me using the false information.

i'm also sorry i keep having to make lengthy public posts but all my methods of communication are closed off.

[chaosblast]

logging in only bc this is serious so someone showed me. someone literally anyone please tell ridley / show him this post i am going to handle sugarydeceit trying to utilize his breakdown and shit and i will make sure sugarydeceit doesnt put him in any danger me and my bf are fucking furious and we're both just really really sorry that sugarydeceit is doing this i would reach out privately but obviously i cant (and my bf cant either) i just dont want ridley to do anything rash i am legitimately so fucking mad i am SHAKING and im sure you can tell thru my tone too how mad i am. i WILL handle this its not ridleys problem and shouldnt ever have been

[sprinklefluffs]

in regards to my discussion of sugarydeceit's safety plan:

i will admit i had doubts in regard to the legitimacy of the safety plan itself. this is due to it blaming people for its attempts before, but i can recognize it is insensitive of me to think so.

i agreed the plan could also be very real, i can't prove it isn't. that's why i only said they were "doubts" and not evidence. this is also why it stayed in a private convo, because i wouldn't want to publicly parade around a claim as if it was true, it was a private speculation.

(here i express doubts, i was not trying to display any of this as solid evidence, it was just speculation.)

i also expressed geniune concern for sugareddeceit, as i hoped it *wasn't* lying because i have concerns. i apologize for speculating, i should've focused on the gross nature of it using suicide attempts as evidence, rather than trying to analyze said evidence of an attempt. /gen

(the claims abt it making gross comments abt my and chaos' attempts can be seen clearly below.)

i can admit when i've made a mistake . even if it was just a discussion in private, and not an outright claim, its a discussion that shouldn't have been had. i shouldn't stoop to its level, as it likes to publicly claim chaos and i lied about our attempts definitively.

(as you can see here, it outright says/implies we lied about our attempts. there is more instances of this but im keeping screenshots concise.)

i'd also like to add that i never harrassed, sent death threats, or purposefully misgendered any minors. i do not know where that comes from. i do apologize if any dms i sent to people came off as rude or abrasive, it was never my intent. /gen

i did once use the incorrect pronouns for someone, but that was a mistake since i couldn't see his profile, so i apologized and fixed it. if i have accidentally misgendered anyone else, i deeply apologize.

(blocked out the individuals name because i know he doesn't want direct involvement.)

no one has to forgive me! especially not sugarydeceit itself, but i'll be sure i don't stray into that kind of behavior again in the future

note: i have no bad blood with the user + any users who may have shared my conversations with them to sugarydeceit. i can own up to the things i say, and while it is hurtful and i want to understand what happened, i understand why those things were shared. that is why i cropped out the name of who these dms were shared with. /gen

[sprinklefluffs]

Fun fact: Sugarydeceit is Buttons, A.K.A the MF that took Lioconvoy to court.

fork found in kitchen dude, we already knew this /lh

[sprinklefluffs]

addressing sugarydeceit's claims against chaosblast ❕

*cracks fingers*... heh.. okay... lets get right into it (im so tired.)

"chaos used kiwifarms as a source of information and excuses it."

nah, what happened was that chaos had been sent the kiwifarms by someone as a possible place for evidence of its other bad behavior. we were not aware of the nature of the site, nor who the creator of the thread was. we took a quick glance and pretty much concluded that the site was a shitty, 4-chan esque incel site that was vile. chaos never used the site for any of his evidence and hasn't touched it since.

now, for the dm conversation, it's lacking a bit of context. bill (chaos' headmate) had been talking to sugarydeceit for a while by the time kiwi was brought up, and it was talking in circles and trying to entrap him with very "waffles v. pancakes" type arguements. bill's reference to the kiwifarms was referring to how sugarydeceit cannot completely dismiss screenshots of its own posts as invalid evidence just because bad people are the ones who archived it. we didn't use any of the screenshots in the kiwi as evidence due to the nature of the site though, it was just bill making the right point at the wrong time.

"chaos has never addressed the kiwifarms claims to the public"

sighs. yes we have! chaos and i have actually addressed this to the public multiple times now! this would be about the third time maybe? you can see in these screenshots below we make our stance very clear on it at seperate occasions:

chaos ALSO apologized directly to sugarydeceit for simply looking at the article, and while his tone was frustrated cause it was actively blackmailing me, the apology was geniune. (this full convos and context of the blackmailing can be seen in the "blackmailing" section of the document.)

"chaos got information from its rapist"

this is not true AT ALL. my assumption is that sugarydeceit is possibly talking about the time a user chaos and i had never seen before vaguely mentioned a "victim" of sugarydeceit's. unfortunately, in a later reply in which chaos was never notified of, the person offhandedly mentioned that this "victim" was really sugarydeceit's rapist "liebe." when chaos had the reply that he hadn't seen pointed out to him, he immediately ceased any interaction with this person and it never went past this reply chain:

(notice the lack of a like + reply on the post mentioning liebe, vs the like and reply on a later reply. chaos still isn't sure of why that happened.)

other individuals who had hurt sugarydeceit / associated with liebe had also attempted to interact with us, but we were not friends and once again ceased any interaction upon hearing they have associated with the rapist. we would NEVER want to associated with disgusting people no matter how much we may hate sugarydeceit.

we have also apologized for these accidental interactions publicly in the past as well:

(this tweet was also in the context of it actively gaining the support of freakycarers, and it trying to dig up evidence of chaos' time being abused in the zcp, which i why i was so upset with it.)

i'm gonna reblog this w/ a part two. because i'm on mobile and it only allows 10 photos per post 😪😪

[sprinklefluffs]

pt.2 of sugarydeceit's claims against chaosblast

the sequel no one wanted of the stuff @unbiasbison brought up:

"sugarydeceit's proship and racism behaviors come from abuse"

this is true, and we addressed this fact in our document! yet, there is a line to where these things excuse that behavior, they may explain them but they cannot be a sole excuse. sugarydeceit was publicly posting about proship + fetishizing child grooming & rape at the age of 26 and only stopped about a year ago (all while dating an 18 year old) which is going to make people wary of it. that is why the doc specifically leaves that portion up to PERSONAL COMFORT and not MORAL JUDGEMENT, as we recognize it is very nuanced due to the nature of its abuse. it may have changed, but if a young person or abuse victim wants to block someone who said those things, they should be able to know and do so.

this includes the racism as well, even if some of it was quite a while ago now, it was extremely racist to specific people and in public places as an adult 19-21. (it even lied about how long it was racist for.) there was also—while not blatantly obvious—racist behaviors up until the age of 24. (i.e. comparing POC to cryptids, allowing its alastor fictive to essentially roleplaying remembering the "jim crow era," saying alastor's design in hell looks white as a "punishment" ?? etc.)

it also just seems insanely insincere about its remorse regarding the racism and seems more bothered that people keep "bringing up its past" if anything. it also tends to hide behind "being mixed" (part indigenous from its grandfather, this can be seen above), but being part indigenous is no excuse for the racism/weird behavior towards black people!

"why is chaos so mad when he did the same stuff that sugarydeceit did when he was abused by kc?"

this is how i know this person is not involved in the community in any way. chaos was FORCED into this incestuous position by kc and was never comfortable nor enjoyed it. it was geniunely part of the cult abuse, it was grooming. he never posted publicly about it, he never defended it, and actively tried to stay as uninvolved with it as possible. chaos never even drew any proship/incest content, especially no art that was nsfw or sexualized minors. the way he behaved about it is incomparable to the way sugarydeceit did.

also, it is such a disgusting comment to make to say "chaos cannot stand that someone had trauma even worse than he had." this is not the trauma olympics. do not try to sit and downplay the 8 years of consistent abuse he suffered from the same exact people since he was 14. you know nothing about chaos or his abuse. no one's abuse was "worse."

the comment about its relationship

sugarydeceit openly compared its relationship to an artist's post regarding a toxic and abusive dynamic. (sugarydeceit has also admitted to comparing its relationship to stalking.) the au creator has been uncomfortable with this behavior for a while, since this aspect of their art was not meant to be romanticized. THAT is why chaos pointed it out, it is weird behavior to romanticize an abusive/toxic dynamic on someone else's posts.

(no hate to the au creator btw! they were just exploring these toxic dynamics and not romanticizing them.)

"chaos' treatment of sugarydeceit proves he must've made burners to harrass minors!"

this simply isn't true, chaos never talks about sugarydeceit unless provoked by it. he also never runs to an alt account or anything like that. he doesn't send anon harrassment nor does he encourage it. if he has something to say he says it on his account. the same applied here, it stayed on his account, while he was much more emotionally charged. he never sent anyone to make alts / burners, nor did he want people to be harrassed, and he is very sorry anyone did.

i think that covers everything pretty well.. so errr peace! ✌️

[sprinklefluffs]

addressing sugarydeceit's claims against chaosblast ❕

*cracks fingers*... heh.. okay... lets get right into it (im so tired.)

"chaos used kiwifarms as a source of information and excuses it."

nah, what happened was that chaos had been sent the kiwifarms by someone as a possible place for evidence of its other bad behavior. we were not aware of the nature of the site, nor who the creator of the thread was. we took a quick glance and pretty much concluded that the site was a shitty, 4-chan esque incel site that was vile. chaos never used the site for any of his evidence and hasn't touched it since.

now, for the dm conversation, it's lacking a bit of context. bill (chaos' headmate) had been talking to sugarydeceit for a while by the time kiwi was brought up, and it was talking in circles and trying to entrap him with very "waffles v. pancakes" type arguements. bill's reference to the kiwifarms was referring to how sugarydeceit cannot completely dismiss screenshots of its own posts as invalid evidence just because bad people are the ones who archived it. we didn't use any of the screenshots in the kiwi as evidence due to the nature of the site though, it was just bill making the right point at the wrong time.

"chaos has never addressed the kiwifarms claims to the public"

sighs. yes we have! chaos and i have actually addressed this to the public multiple times now! this would be about the third time maybe? you can see in these screenshots below we make our stance very clear on it at seperate occasions:

chaos ALSO apologized directly to sugarydeceit for simply looking at the article, and while his tone was frustrated cause it was actively blackmailing me, the apology was geniune. (this full convos and context of the blackmailing can be seen in the "blackmailing" section of the document.)

"chaos got information from its rapist"

this is not true AT ALL. my assumption is that sugarydeceit is possibly talking about the time a user chaos and i had never seen before vaguely mentioned a "victim" of sugarydeceit's. unfortunately, in a later reply in which chaos was never notified of, the person offhandedly mentioned that this "victim" was really sugarydeceit's rapist "liebe." when chaos had the reply that he hadn't seen pointed out to him, he immediately ceased any interaction with this person and it never went past this reply chain:

(notice the lack of a like + reply on the post mentioning liebe, vs the like and reply on a later reply. chaos still isn't sure of why that happened.)

other individuals who had hurt sugarydeceit / associated with liebe had also attempted to interact with us, but we were not friends and once again ceased any interaction upon hearing they have associated with the rapist. we would NEVER want to associated with disgusting people no matter how much we may hate sugarydeceit.

we have also apologized for these accidental interactions publicly in the past as well:

(this tweet was also in the context of it actively gaining the support of freakycarers, and it trying to dig up evidence of chaos' time being abused in the zcp, which i why i was so upset with it.)

i'm gonna reblog this w/ a part two. because i'm on mobile and it only allows 10 photos per post 😪😪

[sprinklefluffs]

I’m sorry I forgot what pronouns Ridley used, I did not intend to encourage infighting, you are right though that was shitty of me

ok bro

[sprinklefluffs]

Glittersyringe responded to an ask sent by Sweetful’s burner, they said they didn’t want to get involved but I do find it a little odd they publically responded to it at all, since they didn’t decline any of the info and instead just said ‘I’m going to step away from this’ which I’m glad they are but it really feels like because of their issues with Chaos, they now actually believe Chaos might be an abuser or smth, it’s gross

1. Ridley doesn't use they/them.

2. Don't insult him or call him gross.

While I may not agree with giving that burner account any attention at all, I do appreciate that he publicly declined involvement as it still discourages people from getting involved themselves. Ridley is just a kid, bun doesn't have to involve himself if he doesn't want to. I'm glad that she's stepping away for clowns own mental health. After everything, I do not expect her to argue with the wall that is sugarydeceit, I think everyone involved with the earlier situation involving ANTICARE—and not the mf trying to make what happened all about it—deserve a chance to rest.

Anyways I'm pretty sure ur just one of many anons trying to encourage infighting. Nice try, dude, but I'm not so immature.

[sprinklefluffs]

@unbiasbison is a burner clearly made by sugarydeceit. please do not support or pedal the slander being shared there. like i said, i will address the claims, probably after work today since clearly sugarydeceit is getting impatient with the fact i cant give it all my damn attention.

i ask that people please continue to be patient and wait for my post before spreading + rbing this misinfo. thank you.

[sprinklefluffs]

It's so weird that in a few years I'm probably going to look back at my art now and think its so bad. Woah, it's so amazing to think about how much people improve. I wonder where I'll be in a few years from now.

[sprinklefluffs]

you didnt improve that much bud. thats what you get for procrastinating. idiot.