Correcting a Reddit Post on Transgender Topic
First, we'll start of by saying this; transgender folks always avoid scientific/biological facts. Science and biology doesn't say the definition of woman is "someone who says they're a woman." Biologically, a woman is an adult female who was assigned female at birth based on physical sex characteristics like the vagina, uterus and ovaries with XX chromosomes. With that being said, how can someone claim being a woman if they don't have those physical characteristic along with XX chromosomes? It wouldn't make sense in reality. I do believe gender is a social construct, like trans people love to say, but the definition of social construct is below:
I would like to highlight the part where it says "idea." Also the fact that it was "created by the people in a society." Social constructs, as seen above, have nothing to do with science, biological factors, or reality. Let me put another definition:
Being a woman does not simply exist inside a human brain. The biological definition proves that. At this point, its a blurred and fake reality. Aka a delusion.
Here is the next point they made:
The first sentence is easily explained with the information above. As I said before, a woman is an adult female who was assigned female at birth based on physical sex characteristics like the vagina, uterus and ovaries with XX chromosomes. I will repeat this as many times as I need to. How does someone identify as a woman you ask? Trans people claim "an internal sense of being a woman." This is rooted in gender, which is again, a social construct, which I provided the definition above. Biologically, it's not about a corrupted sense of self, but again, physical sex characteristics (one example being the uterus,) and XX chromosomes. That's the reality of things. Second question they asked was "how do you define a woman?" This will probably be repeated a lot. A woman is biologically defined as an adult female who was assigned female at birth based on physical sex characteristics and XX chromosomes. Let me define "female" for you:
They claim we do not know the answer to the definition of woman, which is false, as you can see by the definitions provided. They ignore the reality of things, and now they believe there isn't a definition of woman. You can't change a biological definition based off false beliefs.
I am a little confused with the wording here. "It's not scientific practice to say an old definition can be only be wrong when the new definition comes in," with the following claim, "if an old definition is observed to be wrong, then its wrong." To me it's a contradicting claim. You said that you can't say an old definition can only be wrong when the new definition comes in but then say if a definition is observed to be wrong it's a wrong definition. If you can't say its wrong but its been observed wrong is a little crazy. Their second claim is that there was no working definition of water for 127 years, but people continued to drink it because even without a definition knew they needed water, which is obvious because, you know, living things need water. The reason trans people and their supporters are called woke and unscientific is because of posts like this, claiming there is either no definition of being a woman or a claiming the definition of a woman isn't what biology already proved it is. There is, as I proved, a working definition of a woman and a female. What it really comes down to is other people denying reality and what's already genuinely known. These people can't stand being wrong.
Robert Boyles, from my understanding, did not have an explicit definition for gender.
He studied more traditional roles, social stability and experimental science from my understanding. The claim that we need gender to survive is extremely false, and the only thing that claim tell me is that these people use their gender as their whole identity, because who on earth said you need gender to survive? Here's evidence that if people had common sense I wouldn't have to share:
Science has 100% caught up, its the trans community that's falling way behind, obviously. Relying on self-identification with stuff like this is the problem. There is a definition for what a woman really is, so you cannot tell somebody there isn't a definition. The thing with trans people's brain is they are moved by the media. The media has played a large part in transgenderism and its plain and obvious. Not only that, they ignore basic facts because their delusional beliefs do not align. People do not expect trans people to wait hundreds of years before living. Nobody is stopping them from living. Truth is, they're stopping themselves. They tell us they're comfortable and proud of their trans-ness, but then as soon as someone like me gives them the facts and doesn't play into their delusion, they play the victim and throw a fit. I've seen it all too much, in person and in the media. And I and a lot of other people who don't play into them do not want them dead. In fact, its the opposite way around. They mock and celebrate Charlie Kirk's death because they disagree with him, and they've even told other people who don't use their preferred name and pronouns to drop dead. We are not religiously holding up a "defunct definition," we're just normal people who know reality from delusion. We don't care if trans people are dead? That's not how people like me think, (I know that maybe a few conservatives think that way, and I don't support that either,) but on the other hand, how do the woke people think. They always talk about how they want Trump dead, and even before Kirk died they wanted him dead too. All because they didn't agree with them. I believe I've put enough sense, reality, and definitions into this post. It was a long one, but there was a lot to go over.