#1m1w

[soniaapple]

Yaelah gemes bgt si panda lg ngaca sama kaos kaki 🐼😬💓 #hugomikael #1m1w

[soniaapple]

Grrr!💢 #hugomikael #1m1w

[aestheti-que]

ok but like if you believe marriage is between a man and a woman, why don’t you just marry someone of your opposite sex???? like gay people over here aren’t trying to force you to suck dicks soooooo

[team-minnesota]

True Marriage

[timmcmenaminor]

Nike Inc. has formed a PAC to support marriage equality and seeded it with $280,000 from the company and its executives. The Nike Equality PAC will raise funds from Nike-affiliated donors and support marriage equality. The PAC will work closely with the Oregon United for Marriage campaign, a coalition of businesses and individuals working to earn same-sex couples the right to marry. Nike isn't a newcomer to supporting equal rights. It extended benefits to domestic partners in 2000. It supported non-discrimination legislation in 2005. If Nike Already Supports SS benefits to domestic partners and non-discrimination then why The Push For Same Sex Marriage? http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/threads_and_laces/2013/11/nike-forms-pac-support-marriage-equality.html

[timmcmenaminor]

Why Marriage Matters!!

A wealth of examples have been identified by legal scholars who have pointed out the conflicts that will arise between the rights of people who sincerely disagree with homosexual marriage, and the rights of homosexual couples to demand that the state enforce gay marriage whether people support it or not. These conflicts can result in people losing their jobs, professionals be stripped of their professional licenses or being fined by the state, and churches losing their tax exemptions. Most troubling is the impact on children, particularly as the public schools begin the process of indoctrinating them on the subject of homosexual marriage. http://www.protectmarriageoregon.com/why-marriage-matters

[timmcmenaminor]

The Case for Man/Woman Marriage

A debate is taking place in many countries about whether or not marriage should be re-defined to include gay and lesbian couples. This short video commissioned by The Iona Institute explains why marriage should not be redefined. It explains that marriage between a man and a woman is primarily a child-centred institution aimed at giving children what they long for, namely the love of a mother and father. In the end this debate comes down to whether or not we believe in the special value to a child of having a loving mother and father. If we believe in this, then it makes sense to have a special social institution (marriage) which recognises this fact. If we don't believe in the special value of motherhood and fatherhood or of the natural ties, then it's a whole other story. Here are links to two other short documents on the topic: http://ionainstitute.eu/assets/files... http://ionainstitute.eu/assets/files...

[inspiredpatriot]

You know what...

I always thought to myself.."How could the people in 1973 allow Row v. Wade to pass? How could they not stand up for life and make an impact to show the Supreme Court that life is sacred??" 

Well, I guess I got my answer today with the ruling that DOMA is unconstitutional. We have allowed ourselves to be run over by the liberal media that controls the rhetoric of today. People have no idea how far they have been fooled into believing their lies and ideas on 'equality'. 

I am deeply saddened by today's ruling, but it pushes me to be even more active in educating people on the truth of Christian values and principles that I hold so dear to my heart.