Realizing Experiences As Valid
Yesterday, I had a conversation with Sam, a friend of mine whom I’ve known for a couple of years and share similar views and sympathies. A part of our discussion was how perception of reality factors into social inequalities. We talked about how language is the indicator of how people perceive reality, and how certain words enable other people’s realities to be abstractions. Words like “people” and “oppression,” for example. Sam said that it takes away from the reality of another person’s experiences when people use those terms to generalize an experience as if we all experience it, when in reality, we do not and do not experience to the extremity that informs social inequalities to happen. I told him that there are just certain things I cannot do anymore, and wished there was a way to make a point rather than deal with the drama of other people’s ignorance. The solution we talked about and discussed was to be specific. I’ve tried doing that on social media today and the message seemed to get across better. The risk, of course, is generalization, because not all of said social group consist of the behavior, but the fact that it is a behavior of said social group, it needs to be pointed out and made real.
Looking at my life experiences leading to the present, there are able-bodied individuals who think that I have no perception of reality. I wrote about this before, but this conversation provoked a second look.
Reality for me is seeing what it is front of me and responding to what I see. Often times, it’s a verbal response. Sometimes it is written. Sometimes it’s subtle, but it is a response. Able-bodied people do not see my capabilities of grasping reality either because they do not know my reality, or they choose to ignore it. It’s been made easy to ignore the perceptions of the ability-increased, and it makes it hard to confront, challenge, and change those who see these perceptions as “disabled.”
Growing up, people who cared and still do care about me have used their grasp of reality as a crux to get me to shut up. It’s a powerful power tool that able-bodied people have used to silence my voice and to put me in my place, which is below them. When I present a point, given all necessary homework and tactful approach, which no one gives me credit for, it is still viewed as this:
Not what it actually is, which is more in line with this:
Basically, it is common perception that due to my Asperger’s, my lens is foggy, cracked, or whatever damage done to it through the syndrome makes me unaware of reality. It makes me stupider than the able-bodied person I am talking to, who always knows more, experienced more, and who has a firmer grasp of the objective nature of reality, and therefore, can be objective. The human mind is the one of the most subjective organs out there, next to the penis. It usually takes consensus to be objective these days, and even so, outside influences who have their own subjective agendas are prone to use their influence and call it objective. This is a post Citizens United world we are living in, and FOX News still parlays itself as “fair and balanced.”
I find myself asking, who is at the greater “disability” here? It is not like I offered my mind to be controlled upon diagnosis. How can able-bodied people control my mind when they aren’t in my mind? How can they assume agency over how I think, act, and behave when they don’t know me, know how I think, how I react? At the end of the day, I am reduced to being a predictable, unregulated, opinionated label who needs to shut up all the while able-bodied people push my buttons and act surprised when I react. I’m just a cognitive illusion to people, not a human being with feelings, thoughts, and a mind that can be equally objective. If they cannot see my humanity, they are at the greater disability. I’m trapped in a binary in which no complex ambiguity allows itself to show my humanity.
When I look in a mirror, I see myself. When I look at my life, I see my experiences and how those experiences shaped me. I always talked in abstractions when it came to social inequalities, and in doing so, I’ve enabled them to continue. What is real to me is not real to someone else, but their reality is their experiences and therefore, it is real. My conversations with people, able-bodied or not, about my experiences should validate my own experiences in the reality of which they are based in, if able-bodied people care to know about my experiences.
Able-bodied people should not be expected to validate ability-increased experiences, as much as men shouldn’t be expected to validate women’s experiences, heterosexuals shouldn’t be expected to validate GLBT experiences, and white people shouldn’t be expected to validate people of color’s experiences. When a person shares an experience with you that impacts their life, we should listen to them. We should take off the cue and either modify our behavior or learn about it some more. By “we” and “are” I mean people with social privilege.
Realizing my conversations make take some time, and it may not fly with people, but who cares as long as it flies with me. Realizing conversations is ability-positive. My life is not abstract by design, it is abstract by dominant perception. I may not be able to control what people think of me, but I do believe myself to be living in the real world, with real experiences, and with a firm grasp on reality.