Here's my two (completely unprompted) cents on birth control/abortion stuff. (TW: abortion, fetus death, coin locker babies)
First off, I'm a pro-choice protestant christian: Although I believe that a perfect world wouldn't require people to make the hard choice on whether or not to keep the baby, I'm fully aware that perfect world, where medical advances mean that 1 in 5 pregnancies don't kill the mother, rape (including "they're impaired but we're fucking anyway" situations) have ceased to be a thing, birth control is 100% effective, the foster care system is a safe place for children to go if their parents can't/shouldn't take care of them, adopting your kids is so normalized that nobody cares that someone's adopted, people are paid a living wage, etc, isn't coming any time soon. Second, I believe that abortion isn't a matter of morality, but of ethics.
The pillars of medical ethics are (as quoted here) Maximising benefit, Minimizing harm, Justice, and Autonomy. Autonomy means that it needs to be up to the person with the baby to decide what they're going to do -- and that we need to give them the resources to make an informed choice. Sometimes pregnancy hormones mean that the rape victim decides to keep the baby, or to put them into the foster care system, but they may also decide that it's best to kill the fetus -- No matter what, we must respect their choice. Maximising benefit and Minimizing harm are where the method comes into play.
Specifically, I believe that some methods of killing a fetus are more ethical than others, whether due to the effects on the mother, the effects on the child, or for other reasons. Although I will always advocate for contraception (including abstinance) as the best form of birth control, the next best thing is the Morning-After pill. There's no harm to the mother, the fetus (if there even is one) is simply a mass of cells, it's well tested, and nobody even has to know if you're pregnant. At the other extreme is the coin locker baby: the mother had to go through an entire unwanted pregrancy knowing she wouldn't be able to care for the baby (meaning there's a LOT of hormones and feelings towards that child), the baby (who HAS ALREADY BEEN BORN) is suffocated to death in a plastic bag as they sit in a small dark place, afraid and without their mother, it has ZERO benefit to someone who's going through pregnancy complications... THE MOTHER IS LITERALLY HAVING TO MURDER THEIR OWN CHILD BECAUSE THERE IS NOWHERE FOR THAT KID TO GO. Now, this is an extreme measure, but I'm bringing it up to illustrate a point: well wishes aren't a substitute for a way out of an unwanted pregnancy. I do believe it's more ethical to perform an abortion earlier, but even just knowing you can send a child into the foster care system can change someone's choice on what they want to do. And let me just say this: for a country that's trying to stop people from having abortions, we have a lot of really unsafe ones. To quote nbc news, "Abortions take place around the world, no matter the legal setting," the report [by the Guttmacher Institute, which they heavily reference] reads. But, it adds, “Provision of abortion is safest where it has long been legal." Abortion rates generally go down where contraceptives, bodily autonomy for women, public healthcare, and living wages are.












