#amd_graphics_technology

[phonemantra-blog]

But only server ones Despite the fact that there is still quite a bit of information on the Internet about the AMD Zen 5 architecture and products based on it, today we have received quite detailed data about CPUs based on Zen 6. The information concerns mainly server CPUs, but it is still important, because some things can be implemented in consumer ones. The author of the Moore’s Law Is Dead channel obtained data on Epyc-E server processors, which are intended for telecommunications and peripheral systems. Such CPUs will only have up to 64 cores, but the “larger” Epyc will, of […]

But only server ones Despite the fact that there is still quite a bit of information on the Internet about the AMD Zen 5 architecture and products based on it, today we have received quite detailed data about CPUs based on Zen 6. [caption id="attachment_85418" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD[/caption] The information concerns mainly server CPUs, but it is still important, because some things can be implemented in consumer ones. [caption id="attachment_85419" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD[/caption] The author of the Moore's Law Is Dead channel obtained data on Epyc-E server processors, which are intended for telecommunications and peripheral systems. Such CPUs will only have up to 64 cores, but the “larger” Epyc will, of course, have more cores. AMD will pack 32 processor cores into one chiplet. [caption id="attachment_85420" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD[/caption] In this case, what interests us most is that Epyc-E will have one chiplet with 32 cores! Let us remember that in almost all AMD processors the chiplet contains eight cores, and only Epyc Bergamo with small Zen 4C cores has chiplets with 16 cores. As you can see, by the time Zen 6 is released, AMD will be able to pack 32 cores per chiplet. This obviously won’t affect consumer Ryzen, but perhaps by that time they will switch to a package of 16 cores per chiplet. Additionally, the 32-chip configuration could allow AMD to easily build 256-core processors. This could already be CPU Venice in SP7 version. https://youtu.be/qpzTmKjaIMU Also, a large number of cores in one chiplet allows AMD to place additional chiplets in the processor without any processor cores at all. FPGAs or other specialized chiplets can be implemented in this way.

[phonemantra-blog]

But the RX 6000 is about as profitable Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT video cards hit the market tomorrow, but today test results for new products obtained by AMD itself have leaked online. At least that’s what HD-Tecnoligia claims. According to these results, the Radeon RX 7800 XT is on average 6.9% faster than the RTX 4070 in games without ray tracing. With it, the AMD card is 11.6% slower. The RX 7700 XT, in turn, is in the same order of magnitude 15.9% faster and 5.4% slower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. New AMD graphics cards are again […]

But the RX 6000 is about as profitable Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT video cards hit the market tomorrow, but today test results for new products obtained by AMD itself have leaked online. At least that's what HD-Tecnoligia claims. [caption id="attachment_52306" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD graphics cards[/caption] According to these results, the Radeon RX 7800 XT is on average 6.9% faster than the RTX 4070 in games without ray tracing. With it, the AMD card is 11.6% slower. The RX 7700 XT, in turn, is in the same order of magnitude 15.9% faster and 5.4% slower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. New AMD graphics cards are again more profitable than new GeForce products. [caption id="attachment_52307" align="aligncenter" width="705"] AMD graphics cards[/caption] [caption id="attachment_52308" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD graphics cards[/caption] Thus, at lower prices, AMD's new products offer, on average, greater performance. True, if we compare the results with the existing tests, it turns out that the RX 7800 XT is not particularly faster than the RX 6800 XT and the RX 7700 XT is approximately the level of the RX 6800. If we compare the new products with these predecessors at starting prices, the new products are noticeably more profitable, especially the higher card. However, the RX 6000 line has long been available at prices significantly lower than recommended, and right now it turns out that the new adapters provide approximately the same price-performance ratio as the old ones.