Introducing … a new musical conlang! Name to be determined, but I’m calling it the Cursed Musical Conlang for now. Here’s a sketch of the orthography so far, though it needs a lot of adjustment:
Unlike Sdefa, which conveys meaning through the pitches of melodies, CMC conveys meaning with chords. In theory these chords could be presented in lots of different ways, with different combinations of instruments or maybe with a melody put on top, but in practice (for the time being) I’ll be using only computer-generated sounds.
That’s because doubly unlike Sdefa, which uses the twelve notes of the equal-tempered scale as its phonemes, CMC uses … well, more than that. Potentially infinite notes, if it goes on long enough. It would be an absolute nightmare to try to play on an acoustic instrument, and getting the computer to do it right is hard enough. I started learning a new computer program just for this.
Meaning is conveyed not by specific pitches, but by the chord qualities and how each chord relates to the last. I won’t get into the specifics of the tuning system or the language itself just yet, because that would be a loooong post. Instead, I’ll just present an example, which translates to “I’m going to make a new language! I started making the language. These sounds are it!”
Note the increasingly weird accidentals! If you’re not familiar with music notation, it doesn’t normally look like that. If you are … don’t worry about it. Instead, give it a listen:
Fun fact: there are 24 unique notes in this example, not counting transposition. Normally you only get 12! F and C in the second chord are not the same as E♯ and B♯ in the twelfth, even though they would be identical on a piano. I’ll get more into the musical side in a future post, including another way of visualizing the weird harmonies!













