eternal sunshine of the spotless mind?
never seen | want to see | terrible | boring | okay | good | great | a favorite

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from India
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Serbia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
eternal sunshine of the spotless mind?
never seen | want to see | terrible | boring | okay | good | great | a favorite
You made a post trying to contradict the "lumpy earth" posts, yet the links you included completely back it up. Which part didn't you understand? Please explain publicly. Thanks. Maybe rather than saying they are "just plain wrong" you should just offer a bit of clarification, because they aren't wrong at all. Surely that is what you meant to do. I agree there is room to misinterpret them but it seems that's what you've done.
Hi there. It seems you've got completely the wrong end of the stick. I was not trying to contradict anything, because the simple fact is that the Earth is not lumpy. Presenting a geoid as an exact representation of the Earth's shape is misinformation and I have not misunderstood anything. I provided an explanation of what exactly a geoid is and why the Earth is not shaped like a geoid in my original post, but let me go into a bit more detail:
As I stated, geoids are not actual representations of the Earth. Putting aside the colouring indicating levels of high and low gravity, the shapes are computer models of a mathematical abstraction. The geoid is a model of the Earth neglecting influences other than gravity and rotation. (This means we get rid of the tides, which is perhaps why google reverse image search thought the gif was an Earth without water.) A geoid could not physically exist as a planet because it is an idealised and simplified shape and neglects a lot of real influences on a planet's structure.
Anyway, because the geoid's shape is strongly influenced by the Earth's gravitational field, the more elevated regions do tend to correspond to areas of higher gravity, which is why it is informative to present information about Earth's inhomogeneous gravitational field on a geoid instead of a more literal sphere.
So in summary, the gif in the misleading post is not a representation of Earth's true shape, as it suggests, or a water-less Earth, as google reverse image search suggests, but a geoid. The Earth is not the same shape as a geoid.
Also... we literally have pictures of the Earth from space. If all this talk of geoids doesn't convince you, check this out. I don't know what else to say.
listen to marillion at all? pros: they sound a lot like genesis. cons: they aren't at all genesis.
omg i just saw your ask, sorry! no i actually don’t know their work that much, just a few songs like childhood’s end and kayleigh, but omg if they sound like genesis i should probably give them a try
who do you admire more? greg lake or john wetton?
as much as in the court of the crimson king is my favorite kc album i'm gonna have to say john wetton, for both his voice and bass playing!! greg is great tho yeah
who is better? tony banks or carl palmer?
ahh that's such a difficult question, they're both incredible at what they do! but if you ask me who my favorite is the answer is tony, he's my favorite musician of all time tbh c: