i posted a video for the first time in a year go watch it
seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Italy
i posted a video for the first time in a year go watch it
sorry ani i love you but like. no
calling all hermitcraft enjoyers
i'm making a video. reply, reblog, send an ask - i dont care -
SHOW ME the most INSANE hermitcraft moments you can remember.
i'm talking like..CRAZY - and the more obscure, the better.
moon crashing into the server? great, but really well known
docm77 killing etho with literally one arrow that teleported there from halfway across the world? MUCH better - not as many people know that
but you get the picture - the wackier and the less known, the BETTER !!!
missed drawing these guys
thoughts on copyright
its very interesting to me to try and think of a mutually agreeable, like...perfect solution to the copyright issue on youtube
because like obviously, splitting the revenue of a 3 hour VOD 50/50 with a musician who's music was in it for about a minute is a bit shit
so like..what if it was based on the percentage of the video that's got the copyrighted material? and the percentages were weighted more heavily for audiovisual copyright together rather than just audio copyright?
but even then like...that's exploitable. if it's based on SOLELY the video runtime, nothing is stopping me from uploading an HOUR of copyrighted music followed by 19 hours of the VOID and claiming 95% of the revenue from doing nothing - and people are smart enough to rewind, and ads can be placed manually to only be in the first hour, et cetera et cetera
so then - as i should have expected tbh with creative works - it becomes a stupidly subjective matter.
sure, the example i just said would obviously have 100% of the revenue to the musicians
(although ofc the creator would fight it with some bullshit like "i hAd tO HaVe a GoOd EnouGh PC to RendEr It")
but like...what about in much more normal cases?
should a uplifting orchestral score that ties an entire video together auditorily be more or less valued than animal crossing music that sets the tone for a comedy video?
of course, fair use exists but like .... that's not something that can be implemented on the scale of youtube, i think - or at least if they can, they sure as hell aren't doing a good idea. it's hard to come up with objective solutions to subjective problems but it's fun as hell to ponder
sweden food discourse is so funny to me when i go to my friends house i have to perform 3 blood rituals and a secret handshake to convince my friend's mothers i'm not starving to death
👀 👀 👀 👀 👀 👀 👀
pomme o'dodo (you are an eXitnct aple )
NOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo---