#architecturaletiquette

[normally0]

Subject: Reprimand Regarding Unacceptable Behaviour

Dear Architects and Designers,

It has come to all our attention that during a press conference, architect Frank Gehry responded to a question regarding criticism of his work by raising his middle finger. Such behaviour is not only unprofessional but also disrespectful and offensive. As members of the architectural community, we must hold ourselves to a higher standard of conduct, particularly when representing our profession to the public and the media.

Furthermore, Gehry's use of the middle finger carries historical connotations and a phallic reference, adding further weight to the offense. The gesture, commonly known as "flipping the bird," has origins dating back centuries, with its current form evolving into a symbol of extreme contempt or hate. Historically, it has been associated with phallic symbolism and used as a form of sexual taunting. While interpretations of gestures may vary, Gehry's choice to respond in this manner reflects poorly on himself and undermines the professionalism and dignity of our field.

While we understand that individuals may face criticism or scrutiny in their careers, responding in such a manner is wholly inappropriate and undermines the integrity of our profession. Architects are tasked with shaping the built environment and addressing complex social, cultural, and environmental challenges. As such, we must demonstrate the utmost respect for diverse perspectives and engage in constructive dialogue, even in the face of criticism.

The use of offensive gestures not only reflects poorly on the individual but also tarnishes the reputation of the architectural community as a whole. We cannot condone behavior that belittles others or dismisses valid concerns and inquiries.

We urge all architects and designers to conduct themselves with professionalism, integrity, and respect in all interactions, whether with colleagues, clients, or the media. Let us strive to uphold the principles of civility and courtesy, recognizing that our actions reflect not only on ourselves but also on the profession we represent.

Sincerely,

Charles F Pigott

[normally0]

Architectural Etiquette: A Lesson in Politeness to Leon Krier

In the world of architecture, where every line and curve carries weighty symbolism, there exists an unspoken rule: civility costs nothing. Yet, amidst the grandeur of towering skyscrapers and the elegance of modern design, a misstep has occurred—a breach of decorum that warrants our attention.

Leon Krier, esteemed architect and urbanist, has committed a grave faux pas by reducing the illustrious Gherkin skyscraper to a mere phallic symbol. In his critique, he likens Norman Foster's masterpiece to a "sexual aberration," dismissing its architectural merit in favor of crude innuendo.

But let us pause for a moment to consider the essence of civility in architectural discourse. It is not merely a matter of politeness, but a fundamental principle that guides our interactions within the profession. Just as courteous words cost little and are worth much, so too does respectful dialogue elevate our collective understanding of the built environment.

Krier's disparaging remarks not only undermine the integrity of Foster's design but also betray a lack of reverence for the craft of architecture itself. To reduce a work of art to base imagery is to disregard the nuance and complexity inherent in architectural expression.

Therefore, let us extend a gentle reminder to Mr. Krier and all architects alike: in our pursuit of truth and beauty, let us not forget the importance of civility. For it is through thoughtful discourse and mutual respect that we uphold the dignity of our profession and honour the legacy of those who came before us.

In conclusion, let us strive to embody the spirit of civility in all our endeavours, recognizing that true greatness lies not in tearing down others but in building each other up with grace and humility.

With warm regards,

Charles F Pigott