I was browsing your carrd, and I was wondering what was bad about queeragamic? (I'm sorry if this comes off as rude, im wholeheartedly not indending to be)
this blog has a ton of posts explaining the problem - basically, the coining post was alloarophobic, and when alloaros (and aros in general) criticized the coiner's attitudes towards sexual qprs, they continued to make (allo)arophobic remarks.
i don't think the concept behind the term is bad. 'queerplatonic relationship' covers a ton of experiences, and i think having subsets of that term is totally fine! it's just that the way it was coined was super shitty.










