The Fashion/Art Disconnection
By: Sean Lee (@seanleelee1)
Contemporary art has taken to priding itself on a disconnect between fashion and art—whereas there was once an inextricable link between the two, the postmodern landscape has established a conscious choice to reject fashion as art. Citing that fashion “serves a purpose” as the reason that it cannot be art, contemporary artists are very willing to overlook a history of liaisons between art and fashion that have stood the test of time and the partnerships that exist to this day.
Perhaps what the artists reject is not the aesthetics of art within fashion but the commercialization of work. When art becomes a commodity without the consent of the artist, it is perceived as having lost its soul. When celebrities don haute couture pieces of art, it suddenly becomes defined by the celebrity that wears it and loses the integrity it possessed on the runway.
In the for-profit industry, fashion is art that truly flies off the racks. One of the best known commodifications of art would be the Yves Saint Laurent Fall 1965 Mondrian collection which featured the blocks of primary color with black borders that Mondrian was known so well for. Yet this dress became a championed pillar of art in fashion—it could be said that the YSL dresses should be looked at as works of art that are more fitting for museums than bodies.
Art is also another way for designers to attract attention, and take their first steps out of the showroom and into stores and magazines. Take for instance the works of Hogan McLaughlin who rose to fame through his connection with Lady GaGa and Daphne Guinness—two of the most powerful and commercial figures of haute couture. Another socialite that once teetered between the world of art and fashion, and whose works are currently on display at our Navillus Gallery, would be Gloria Vanderbilt: a woman whose brand, at the height of its popularity, sold 10 million pairs of jeans a year. Vanderbilt’s name is synonymous with popular culture yet this very prominence allowed her to create high art and go on to sell it. So fashion, at least for the sake of aesthetics rather than purpose, can and should still be considered art.
http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/C.I.69.23
http://thequeenbeetch.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/history-of-fashion-ysl-mondrian-dress/
http://irenebrination.typepad.com/.a/6a00e55290e7c4883301543211df8e970c-320wi