ppl talk all the time abt how the taped banana piece (Comedian by Maurizio Cattelan) is good art because it makes people mad or whatever but has anyone ever even considered the meaning of the piece beyond the fact that people on the internet hate it?? bc like idk i think it's honestly rlly an impressive commentary on suffering and capitalism even if the artist didn't intend it to be that way
i described it to a friend like this and tbh i stand by it:
our society has forced a definition of art that needs to justify being "deserving" of its own existence
there's this idea that there is a minimum amount of suffering an artist has to go through in order to earn their place in the artistic community, and in order to earn enough money to survive
this piece proves that such a system is bullshit, and the mechanisms that determine whether art "deserves" to exist are inconsistent and meaningless and people absolutely do not agree on them, nor are they objective metrics of deciding worth or value
and yet these very same metrics decide whether people have enough money to stay afloat
the wealthy get to play games with money, touting it in front of the poor and desperate for their own entertainment, and people will forever argue if they "deserved" to be saved, never whether the rich should have the power to offer any single person a lifeline out of suffering at any time and only choose to do so at the discretion of their own enjoyment










