Découverte de la Pâtisserie Jeffrey Cagnes installée dans les anciens locaux du Café Biard de la rue Montorgueil, et sa façade au décor de mosaïque bleue, Paris, juillet 2023

seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina

seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina
seen from China

seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Iraq

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
Découverte de la Pâtisserie Jeffrey Cagnes installée dans les anciens locaux du Café Biard de la rue Montorgueil, et sa façade au décor de mosaïque bleue, Paris, juillet 2023
Vue de l'Océan Glacial, pêche aux morses par des Groënlandais (1841), François-Auguste Biard
Magdalena Bay, vue prise de la presqu'île des Tombeaux
François Biard, 1841
Mourir en député (1792 - 1799)
In his excellent book La liberté ou la mort: mourir en député 1792 - 1795, Michel Biard establishes a list of the deputies of the National Convention that died unnatural deaths (e.g. assassination, suicide, execution); since he focuses on the conventionnels whose deaths were connected to their function as representatives of the people, Biard’s list is confined to the period between 1792 and 1799. In total, it comprises 96 names – over twelve percent (!) of the circa 750 deputies of the National Convention.
Le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau, assassinated (21 January 1793).
Marat, assassinated (13 July 1793).
Baille, suicide (2 September 1793).
Sautarya, died in consequence of imprisonment (27 September 1793).
Gorsas, guillotined (7 October 1793).
Birotteau, guillotined (24 October 1793).
Valazé, suicide (30 October 1793).
Antiboul, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Boilleau, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Boyer-Fonfrède, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Brissot, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Carra, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Duchastel, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Ducos (Jean-François), guillotined (31 October 1793).
Duprat, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Fauchet, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Gardien, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Gensonné, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lacaze, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lasource, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lauze de Perret, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lehardi, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lesterpt-Beauvais, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Mainvielle, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Sillery, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Vergniaud, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Viger, guillotined (31 October 1793).
Lidon, suicide (2 November 1793).
Coustard de Massy, guillotined (6 November 1793).
Philippe Égalité, guillotined (6 November 1793).
Gasparin, died en mission (11 November 1793).
Manuel, guillotined (14 November 1793).
Cussy, guillotined (15 November 1793).
Chambon, assassinated (20 November 1793).
Doublet, died in prison (24 November 1793).
Asselin, died in prison (5 December 1793).
Kersaint, guillotined (5 December 1793).
Rabaut Saint-Étienne, guillotined (5 December 1793).
Valady, guillotined (6 December 1793).
Noël, guillotined (8 December 1793).
Fabre, died in combat (20 December 1793).
Grangeneuve, guillotined (21 December 1793).
Dechézeaux, guillotined (17 January 1794).
Bernard, guillotined (22 January 1794).
Cloots, guillotined (24 March 1794).
Beauvais, died in consequence of imprisonment (28 March 1794).
Condorcet, suicide (29 March 1794).
Basire, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Chabot, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Danton, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Delacroix, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Delaunay, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Desmoulins, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Fabre d’Églantine, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Hérault de Séchelles, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Philippeaux, guillotined (5 April 1794).
Simond, guillotined (13 April 1794).
Rebecqui, suicide (1 May 1794).
Masuyer, guillotined (26 May 1794).
Guadet, guillotined (19 June 1794).
Salle, guillotined (19 June 1794).
Buzot, suicide (24 June 1794).
Pétion, suicide (24 June 1794).
Barbaroux, guillotined (25 June 1794).
Osselin, guillotined (26 June 1794).
Vidalin, died en mission (22 July 1794).
Le Bas, suicide (28 July 1794).
Couthon, guillotined (28 July 1794).
A. Robespierre, guillotined (28 July 1794).
M. Robespierre, guillotined (28 July 1794).
Saint-Just, guillotined (28 July 1794).
Perrin, died in prison (14 October 1794).
Carrier, guillotined (16 December 1794).
Féraud, assassinated (20 May 1795).
Brunel, suicide (27 May 1795).
Rühl, suicide (29 May 1795).
Maure, suicide (3 June 1795).
Duquesnoy, suicide (17 June 1795).
Goujon, suicide (17 June 1795).
Romme, suicide (17 June 1795).
Bourbotte, guillotined (17 June 1795).
du Roy, guillotined (17 June 1795).
Soubrany, guillotined (17 June 1795).
Briez, died en mission (23 June 1795).
Tellier, suicide (17 September 1795).
Lebon, guillotined (16 October 1795).
Collot d’Herbois, died en déportation (8 June 1796).
Cusset, shot (10 October 1796).
Huguet, shot (10 October 1796).
Javogues, shot (10 October 1796).
Charlier, suicide (23 February 1797).
Bourdon de l’Oise, died en déportation (22 June 1798).
Casabianca, died in combat (1 August 1798).
Rovère, died en déportation (11 September 1798).
Bonnier d’Alco, assassinated (19 April 1799).
Roberjot, assassinated (19 April 1799).
As Biard notes, one could add a few more names to the list. Three deputies died while being on leave after a mission (due to illness, in most cases), which is why they do not fall into the category “died en mission”: d’Anthoine (19 August 1793), Petitjean (8 March 1794) and Gillet (4 November 1795). Another representative, Aubry, was fructidorisé in 1797 and deported to Guiana, but he managed to escape to Dutch Guiana, where he died of an illness on 17 July 1798 – hence not en déportation, strictly speaking.
Currently reading (#22):
L’écriture d'une expérience: Révolution, histoire et Mémoires de Conventionnels (M. Biard, P. Bourdin, H. Leuwers, Y. Ômi et al.)
This book was published by the Société des études robespierristes in 2016, as the 16th book in the Études révolutionnaires collection. It is based on two conferences that were held at Senshu University in Tokyo (November 2013) and in Ivry-sur-Seine (November 2014) ; hence, the book includes a great diversity of perspectives, which allows French and Japanese historiographies on the Revolution to encounter, confront and enrich each other.
The authors set out to explore the conventionnels’ active consciousness of making history, as well as the memorialisation of the republican era in the memoirs of certain deputies of the Convention. In writing these accounts, the revolutionaries not only confronted their own past as well as the adverse political circumstances of the present under the Bourbon Restoration, but also interacted with the first historians of the Revolution and contributed its early historiography. Following an introduction written by Michel Biard, Philippe Bourdin and Hervé Leuwers, the book is composed of 15 chapters (each between 7 and 31 pages long) which deal with a great variety of topics.
The majority of chapters explore how certain events and phenomena are memorialised and reflected in the memoirs of contemporaries or in other documents. Hervé Leuwers, for instance, examines the tradition connecting Robespierre’s traits to elements of his biography, and demonstrates that this tradition is not only based on the works of the first mémorialistes of the Revolution (Proyart and Charlotte Robespierre, notably), but also on the image which Robespierre himself cultivated through his speeches, writings and public appearances. Yoshihiro Matsuura, on the other hand, studies how Robespierre’s political ascension is reflected in contemporary speeches, writings and memoirs, whereas Takashi Koï examines the representation of “federalism” in the Girondins’ trial and in the memoirs of the deputies of the National Convention. In his chapter, Michel Biard deals with the question if the activities of the representatives of the people en mission have been misportrayed in the memoirs of the Convention’s deputies. Yoshiaki Ômi explores the depiction of “the Terror” in the letters, writings and memoirs of the deputies of Haute-Loire, while Philippe Bourdin examines the reflection of Carnot’s ideology and character in the inventory of his personal library. Natalie Petiteau studies how the memory of the National Convention is represented in the écrits héleniens, which are based on the conversations between Bonaparte and O’Méara, Las Cases, Gourgaud, Antommarchi, Montholon and Bertrand, respectively ; it is interesting to see how certain elements (e.g. his judgement of the Convention’s “errors” and “divisions”, the rehabilitation of Robespierre) shape Bonaparte’s ideology and self-perception. Finally, Koichi Yamazaki studies the account of the creation of the department Hautes-Pyrénées in the memoirs of Bertrand Barère.
Other chapters focus on the memoirs of individual conventionnels and the transmission of the militant legacy of the Revolution from one generation to the next, as well as on the interaction between the former deputies and the historians of the Revolution. Thus, Karine Rance studies the conservation and inheritance of the revolutionary memory in the early 19th century, whereas Maki Sato explores how the aspects of commemoration and self-justification define Adrien Duquesnoy’s memoirs. In a similar vein, Laurent Brassart’s chapter deals with Jean Debry’s struggle for authenticity in his memoirs, and Cyril Triolaire analyses Choudieu’s endeavour to rehabilitate the National Convention through his writings. The case of Joseph Fouché is particularly interesting, as Emmanuel de Waresquiel explores how Fouché’s public and private discours on the Revolution evolved and radically changed throughout the years. Céline Pauvros studies Charles-François Dupuis’ disillusions with the revolutionary project, as reflected in the annotations that he made to his personal copy of Abrégé de l'origine de tous les cultes between 1804 and 1809. Finally, in the last chapter, Mette Harder examines how the former conventionnels interacted with the first historians of the French Revolution – sometimes amicably, other times not so much.
Thematically, this book is at times a bit incoherent, and some of the chapters are so specialised that they are barely accessible for readers that are not particularly versed in the field (e.g. in the case of Philippe Bourdin’s chapter on the fonds Carnot). In spite of these weaknesses, this is a solid book on the French Revolution and can offer valuable insights into the minds of the conventionnels, as well as into the complex processes of conservation and transmission surrounding the militant legacy of the Revolution.
What do you think, citizens?
Classroom in the Larnay Institute for the Deaf in Biard, Poitou region of western France
French vintage postcard
EXPOSITION | Le monde en scène. François-Auguste Biard (1799-1882) ➽ https://bit.ly/Exposition-Peintre-Biard Dans cette exposition, le musée Hébert, situé à La Tronche (Isère) rend hommage au peintre lyonnais voyageur François-Auguste Biard, qui a parcouru les océans du monde entier pour trouver l'inspiration, et que ses tableaux pittoresques ont rendu très populaire de son vivant, au XIXe siècle