Of course, WutBJU checked!
You can check yourself.
Start here.
Verify your age.
Search for "Bob Jones University." And "Bob Jones."
Both EFTA01204065.pdf and EFTA01071548.pdf from Data Set 9 are the same email chain highlighting this 2013 Salon article. Somebody named Greg Brown looks like one of those kings-of-forwards.
BJU is also in a court case documented in 181.pdf, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022). On page 39, Leonard A. Gail, attorney for the defense states:
14 On this notion of Congress amended the TVPA but didn't 15 change, include contribution. That's just another measure of 16 silence. And as the Supreme Court explained in Bob Jones, 17 silence is really only a useful tool if the question that's 18 being debated is in the public discourse. That's 461 U.S. 599. 19 If contribution and indemnification under the TVPA was not in 20 the discourse—and there is no evidence that it was—then the 21 congressional silence means nothing. If anything, the only 22 opinion that ruled on whether the TVPA permitted contribution 23 was the Marriott case, the other case that ruled it not in 24 dicta, and that was consistent with finding the right of 25 contribution because the Court there said to conclude
181.pdf has now been removed from the Epstein files.
Overall, BJU's infamy because of SCOTUS and its anti-scientism in the Press gets it a mention in the most infamous data dump in the 21st century (so far).
Yet, it's a nothing burger.














