i found the vague.i'm actually not sure it's about me (while i was making this post, mutuals have suggested it may be about posts by @sarkofagos that i hadn't seen before the vagues were sent to me, which seem to fit better) but i'm going to respond as though it is because it's a response to ideas i support, and it's an opportunity to expand on the concepts i've been talking about. and as discussed if you don't want people assuming you're talking about them don't vaguepost.
coming here to make a full response because i think this is an opportunity to clarify my objection/criticism of this content and because twitter is an unserious website where complex analysis goes to die even more than tumblr.
first of all let's start with a definition of the thing i'm complaining about. i'm literally just going to quote wikipedia because i can't be assed to get into it. "A nuclear family... is a family group consisting of two parents and their children (one or more), typically living in one home residence. It is in contrast to a single-parent family, a larger extended family, or a family with more than two parents."
i could be wrong but i don't know of anyone arguing that two people raising kids is inherently conservative. it is the emphasis on & hegemony of that framework to the exclusion of all other layers of community being involved in childrearing, the exclusion of any other household members besides the parents and children, and the exclusion of the ability of a single parent to meet their children's needs, that makes it conservative. why doesn't anyone else ever live at the burakh house? as jon has asked: where is oyun? why does artemy always need daniil to watch the kids: where is his entire canonical support system? why does someone need to watch the kids? why is artemy suddenly in need of someone to share parental duties with? that's not my man...
i personally can't be bothered to argue about the oocness of dadkovsky because to me it's just cartoonish but it definitely is ooc for artemy in a way that frustrates me, in part because of the above concept and also (in the realm of "hey you know these guys don't like each other right") i don't think artemy would want daniil around his kids. i think he cares too much about them to let daniil act daniil-like towards them. read a fic where daniil screamed at sticky and artemy was fine with it :person_standing: MORE importantly though i think it (further) degrades sticky and murky's agency. it's pretty important that canonically in p2 sticky and murky adopt artemy and not the other way around. it's their choice. murky actually adopts sticky as her brother before she accepts artemy as a father figure. content that makes daniil sticky and murky's parent by virtue of his relationship with artemy, by contrast, draws on conservative structures of family and power; it is predicated on the (perceived) universal law that the romantic partner of your parent is your parent, and their position as an adult in your household gives them power over you. the idea of this system being replicated with sticky and murky flies in the face of the independence and willfulness they both demonstrate in canon. it's especially bad with murky, whose relationship with artemy is earned through a struggle that comprises one of the major plots of the game; the reduction of her character to an adult-dependent little girl who accepts the authority of and even demands affection/attachment from Some Guy Artemy Is Fucking, which is so pervasive in domestic burda, is kind of antithetical to what makes her a compelling character imo?
side note inb4 the gotchas: it's true that burda nuclear family content is a more inclusive definition of a nuclear family for including adoptive children and same-sex parents (although this is now an accepted definition of a nuclear family). however i personally despise the idea that gay liberation and child welfare means equal access to the same repressive systems that tormented women and children and elders throughout the 20th century.
there's nothing wrong with wanting "deeply traumatized people [to] find peace after a traumatic event" -- BUT the implication here, that the way to find peace is by constructing a nuclear family unit, is definitely a conservative ideology, especially when the actual game shows artemy finding peace in fatherhood WITHOUT a romantic partner or co-parent. do you see what i'm saying?
















