You seem to be unnecessarily salty about this whole Journal 3/Cipher Hunt thing. Yeah, Ford was an abuse victim. But it seems to me that you automatically assume bad faith and take any instance of pointing out Ford's flaws as saying he deserved to be abused because of them. That simply isn't the case. When you claim that you know the characters Alex Hirsch created better than he does and that there's something wrong with him, that's a sign you may be going a bit overboard. Please, chill out.
So, uh.... yeah not only have I literally gone on record saying that I donât claim to know more about Ford than Hirsch does, but also...
Saying that an abuse victim (even a fictional one) is at fault for their own abuse is? Pretty terrible? Itâs bad representation. Itâs rude, it hurts real abuse survivors, and whatâs even more important? In this particular case, it silences male victims of abuse, who are already underrepresented and blamed for their own abuse in our patriarchal society.Â
Like, you can have an egotistical abuse survivor, Iâm not saying you canât! But a) if you want an egotistical abuse survivor you have to write him that way, and b) as a general rule you want to include more than one survivor so you donât unintentionally make a blanket statement about all abuse survivors. (This goes for any attempts to diversify storytelling: the easiest way to avoid stereotyping your characters is to have multiple characters from the same demographic with different personalities that donât follow the stereotypes set by the first). Cause people will find every excuse in the book to erase and invalidate what a survivor went through.
Second, so far no oneâs pointed out his actual flaws to me!
Ford thinks of people in absolutes: thatâs his most major flaw. Itâs not born of ego! in his own eyes heâs a freak until he proves himself wrong by literally becoming perfect
Ford has a very gray sense of morality as long as he thinks his ultimate goal is pure: thatâs a flaw (Irug vwhdov udglrdfwlyh zdvwh).Â
Ford is really fucking reckless when it comes to lab safety (no fucking guard rail on that damn portal, random ass red hot sigil just... just fucking out there in the open WHY they give you a packet at the beginning of 9th grade Ford donât you read). Thatâs a flaw
Wkhuh zdv wkdw zkroh exvlqhvv zlwk wkh plqg frqwuro wlh exw erwk vlghv ri wkh dujxphqw ixfnhg xs rq wkdw wrslf iru uhdvrqv L'oo hasodlq zkhq L ilqlvk pb srvw derxw lw.Â
Ford can hold a grudge like no oneâs business even against his own self and is easily consumed by the past. Thatâs a flaw!
Fordâs âflawsâ that have been pointed out to me thus far have been: âFordâs egotisticalâ âFord doesnât care about Stanleyâ âFord doesnât care about Mabelâ âFord doesnât have a shadow/is working with Billâ âFord doesnât care about Fiddlefordâ and âFord thinks Dipper is a tiny clone of himself he identifies with Dipper but thatâs not the same thing and I wonât get into Journal spoilers but my previous statements still hold up and is slowly manipulating himâ. Honorable mention: âFord is sexist/racist/homophobic/transphobicâÂ
Oh, and fyi I donât know where you were for the past year but until the show ended the Stanford Pines tag was filled with people calling for his head. Seriously, quite a few famous fans actually wanted Ford to die. And these people were in the main tags, too! We had to form a squad to keep the tag positive.Â
And thatâs not even mentioning the shitstorm that would ensue if Iâd made a post even mentioning Stanleyâs flaws back in the day (even now, sometimes I get vibes like that).
So maybe think about that before you say I should chill.
And if you donât like how salty I am about this? Thereâs a nifty button you can press to make it go away!
Authorial intent is inherently meaningless, reader interpretation determines the quality of the work, buy gold, bye.