seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
How did India become the center of global power in 2025? In this in-depth global affairs breakdown, we explore how India transformed from a rising economy into the world’s new power hub — driven by geopolitics, demographics, strategy, and global realignment.
Trump Strikes Tariff Note: Friendly Words for India, Sharp Eye on Its China-Russia Connect
President Trump praises US-India relations but slams “one-sided” trade, defending high tariffs amid India’s growing bonds with China and Russia, sparking retaliations and warnings from experts. In a recent Oval Office address, US President Donald Trump addressed ongoing trade tensions with India, stating, “We get along with India very well, but for many years, it was a one-sided relationship……
"True Indian Wouldn’t Say That": Supreme Court Rebukes Rahul Gandhi Over China Claim, Stays Defamation Case
In a dramatic courtroom exchange, the Supreme Court of India sharply criticized Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for his claims that China had annexed 2,000 square kilometers of Indian territory. While the apex court temporarily stayed the defamation proceedings against him, it minced no words in questioning both the accuracy and intent of his statements.
“If you’re a true Indian, you wouldn’t say it,” remarked the bench, pulling Gandhi up over his comments made during a 2022 press conference.
Court to Gandhi: Why Not Raise This in Parliament?
A two-judge bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih posed a direct challenge to Gandhi, asking:
“How did you know about 2,000 km being annexed by the Chinese? You being leader of the Opposition, why would you say these things? Why will you not ask these questions in Parliament?”
The top court was hearing Gandhi's plea seeking to quash a defamation case filed in Uttar Pradesh. The case had been triggered by his repeated public statements accusing China of territorial encroachment and the Modi government of remaining silent on the matter.
The Origins of the Controversy
Gandhi had first made the claim during a press conference in Rajasthan in 2022, where he said:
“They will ask about Bharat Jodo Yatra and Ashok Gehlot, but no one will ask about China capturing 2,000 square kilometres of Indian territory or killing 20 of our soldiers.”
He reiterated similar points during a press meet in Jammu and Kashmir in January 2023, asserting that former Indian Army personnel and a Ladakhi delegation had confirmed the territorial loss.
“The Prime Minister is the only person who believes China has not taken any land. I met ex-army officers and a delegation from Ladakh who said Chinese troops have occupied several patrolling points.”
Free Speech or Defamation?
Rahul Gandhi challenged the case in the Allahabad High Court earlier this year, calling it “politically motivated” and claiming it was filed with malicious intent. However, on May 29, the High Court refused to quash the proceedings, ruling that freedom of speech does not extend to defamatory attacks on the Indian Army.
The Congress leader then approached the Supreme Court for relief.
While the Supreme Court has now stayed the ongoing defamation trial, the justices’ strong remarks indicate they are taking the matter seriously.
Government Responds Swiftly
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju, who hails from Arunachal Pradesh—a region often at the center of India-China tensions—was quick to respond. Reposting his earlier statements on X (formerly Twitter), Rijiju reiterated that:
“China has not taken even an inch of land in Arunachal Pradesh.” He criticized Gandhi for spreading a "false narrative", asserting it undermines national morale and security.
A Matter of National Integrity or Political Posturing?
The controversy has reignited a long-standing debate in India about freedom of expression, national security, and the limits of political speech. Rahul Gandhi’s supporters argue that he's raising uncomfortable truths the government wants to avoid, while critics—including the judiciary—question the wisdom of making such claims publicly without clear evidence.
The Supreme Court's stay may bring temporary relief to Gandhi, but the broader political and legal battle over his remarks is far from over.
Tables
Law, Joga, Chinese Medicine #china_india.
View On WordPress
