Ritalin and Dopaminergic System Part 6
Following article courtesy of @lmcomie:
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033693&representation=PDF
Sadasivan, S., Pond, B.B., Pani, A.K., Qu, C., Jiao, Y., & Smeyne R.J. (2012) Methylphenidate Exposure Induces Dopamine Neuron Loss and Activation of Microglia in the Basal Ganglia of Mice. PLOSONE, 7(3).
Last post about this article! I finally found some time to go through the materials and methods. So St. Jude Children's Research Hospital was where this research was done. The mice were 3 weeks old and maintained on a 12h light/dark cycle (this is normal). Starting when they were 28 days (this is about young adulthood/just off weaning), they were given injectsion of saline, 1mg/kg or 10mg/kg Ritalin at 5pm - 1 hour before their active nocturnal phase at 6pm.
Doses were chosen sbased on previous studies in rodents suggesting that Ritalin doses of < 5mg/kg mirror those that are used in clinical practice, as opposed to recreational and narcoleptic use = dose of 10mg/kg.
Ritalin injections were given 5 days a week and at the end of the 12 weeks, the animals were allowed a washout period of a week.
After the week of washout, the mice were anesthetized and euthanized. The method they describe is fairly common for brain analysis. And then the brain was sliced to 10um thick for analysis. I can't tell if they had to count neurons by eye or not, but they mentioned using a "optical fractionator method" - it may be some sort of estimating tool developed with a specific microscope in mind.
For MPTP treatment, the final concentration was 5mg/ml and each animal was given 4 injections of 20 mg/kg MPTP - one every 2 hours for 8 hours. All mice then stayed around for a week after the injections, before euthanization.
The rest of the article describes the methods they used for measuring mRNA and expression signals - unfortunately not my forte - but still a well documented method in many different studies.
I think one thing to note is that the n levels (number of subjects) that they tested throughout these experiments is relatively low compared to how many mice are usually put through an experiment. The n numbers are anywhere from 3 to 8. This is not very high. IE. They're using the results from 3 mice to come to this conclusion. The research would have been much stronger had there been at least 10 mice per category. The logistics, however, would have been difficult. (Why? Cuz mice don't like injections anymore than humans do)
@atdiy/@tymkrs













