California produced over half its May electricity from solar, a world record
New batteries to store solar electricity and low demand in May both contributed to high percentage of electricity that came from solar.
seen from Georgia

seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sweden
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Russia
seen from Saudi Arabia
California produced over half its May electricity from solar, a world record
New batteries to store solar electricity and low demand in May both contributed to high percentage of electricity that came from solar.
so the green hydrogen market is about to absolutely explode, and if you're not paying attention yet, now's the time to start. we're talking about jumping from $6.52 billion in 2024 to a projected $86.44 billion by 2030. that's a 53.8% compound annual growth rate, which is... pretty wild. the industry is basically scaling from pilot projects and small demonstrations to full commercial operations across the globe. what's driving this? a few big things. governments are getting serious about decarbonization — india's backing a $2.3 billion plan to produce 5 million metric tons of green hydrogen by 2030. the u.s. has the inflation reduction act's section 45v tax credits making it way more competitive. and the tech is actually improving faster than expected. new electrolyzer designs (especially PEM and alkaline systems) are getting more efficient, cheaper, and faster at ramping up with variable renewable energy. you can dig into the full findings here: https://www.nextmsc.com/report/green-hydrogen-market-ep3583 the real question is: where's all this hydrogen actually going? turns out it's not just one thing. steel and heavy industry are huge — germany's salzgitter steelmaker is working on a $2.94 billion project to cut co₂ emissions by 30%. chemicals and fertilizer production is another major player. but we're also seeing green hydrogen creep into mobility (fuel cell buses, trucks, ships) and grid storage for balancing renewable energy. https://www.nextmsc.com/images/green-hydrogen-market-share-by-end-user_1761215781.jpg shows where demand is concentrated right now. the tech side is interesting too. regions like north america and europe are leading in deploying different electrolyzer technologies, but china's absolutely dominating in total renewable capacity (3,207.3 GW vs europe's 551.8 GW), which gives them a massive advantage for scaling hydrogen production. solar is doing most of the heavy lifting for green hydrogen projects right now since solar costs have dropped so much. but it's not all smooth sailing. high capital costs, limited pipeline infrastructure, and the fact that some companies are actually scaling back their targets (repsol cut its 2030 goal by 63%) show that the economics still need work. the tech is ready. the policies are getting there. the real bottleneck is infrastructure and making it cost-competitive without subsidies. if you're an investor, policymaker, or just curious about where clean energy is heading, this is worth a deeper look. there's a free sample you can grab before committing: https://www.nextmsc.com/green-hydrogen-market-ep3583/request-sample
7 Reasons Why Solar Energy is the Future of Power Generation
Solar isn't just an alternative anymore, it's becoming the default. This article lays out 7 concrete reasons why: costs down over 70 percent in a decade, zero emissions, reliability during outages, and scalability from rooftops to full solar farms. It also covers the job growth happening across manufacturing, installation, and engineering as the industry expands. Full read here: https://ahlecsolar.com.au/2023/03/16/7-reasons-why-solar-energy-is-the-future-of-power-generation/?utm_source=tumblr&utm_medium=social-bookmarking
own the solar plant or just buy the power? (a gujarat factory question)
A textile guy in Sachin asked me this straight: "I just want a lower bill. Why does everyone keep asking if I want to own the thing?"
Fair. That IS the question though.
Own it (EPC route) -you put up the capital, a Solar Wind & Hybrid EPC Solution Provider in Surat builds it, you keep the asset. Cheapest power you'll get, since nobody's margin sits between you and the electrons. But panel degradation at year eight is yours. Inverter replacement at year twelve is yours. DISCOM paperwork, forever, yours.
Buy the power (IPP route) -developer builds and owns it, you sign a PPA, usually 25 years, zero capex. Solar Wind & Hybrid independent power producers run this, often as group captive: 26% equity from you, 51% of generation consumed by you, and a big chunk of open access charges disappear. Higher tariff. Almost no headache.
The thing people miss: your factory doesn't stop at 6pm. Solar does. So you either buy evening power at commercial rates and watch your savings evaporate, or you go hybrid - wind and solar generating at different hours, steadier output, far more of your own power actually used.
KP Group is a clean example of both models sitting side by side. KPI Green Energy owns solar and hybrid capacity as an IPP. KP Energy does wind EPCC and Balance of Plant for others. Same promoter, completely different businesses. Anyone pitching both without explaining that difference -push back.
Before you decide anything: pull your hourly load curve. Not the monthly bill. The hourly one. That graph makes the decision for you.
Everything else is just negotiation.
The Federal Government has approved a new financing framework to provide reliable 24-hour electricity to health facilities across Nigeria, t
The Federal Government on Tuesday approved a financing framework and a set of institutional reforms to accelerate the electrification of health facilities across the country, with a target of providing reliable 24-hour electricity to at least 30 per cent of Nigeria’s health facilities by the end of 2027. The approval was granted at the third meeting of the Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee of the Nigeria Power for Health Initiative, a presidential programme jointly coordinated by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and the Federal Ministry of Power to improve electricity access in public health institutions. The Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare, Dr Iziaq Salako, who disclosed the outcome of the meeting, said the committee also endorsed new governance structures, approved a facility energy management framework and cleared eight private sector proposals for further engagement after they emerged from about 70 submissions received during the National Healthcare Electrification Investor Matchmaking Week held in Lagos. He said the decisions marked a major step towards delivering uninterrupted electricity to hospitals through public-private partnerships. “This is progress with respect to the Nigeria Power for Health Initiative that was established by Mr President after the National Dialogue in December 2025. The Steering Committee considered the report of the Technical Committee and members were particularly happy with the progress made so far,” Salako said. According to him, the committee approved a financing framework to mobilise investments for healthcare electrification and another framework on facility energy management to ensure participating hospitals establish systems for managing energy infrastructure sustainably. He disclosed that Energy Management Teams had already been constituted in federal tertiary hospitals, while state governments had been encouraged to establish similar structures in their health facilities. Salako further announced that the initiative would now be institutionalised through dedicated budgetary provisions and the establishment of a full-time Project Coordination Unit to oversee implementation. “Our goal, as approved by Mr President, is to ensure that we deliver reliable energy access to at least 30 per cent of Nigeria’s health facilities by the end of 2027 using public-private partnerships that prioritise energy-as-a-service delivery models,” he said. The minister explained that different energy technologies would be deployed based on the needs of individual facilities. “There is no one-size-fits-all approach. Some facilities will use mini-grids, others may adopt gas-powered systems or other solutions. We will deploy whatever technology best suits each location,” he added. Speaking on progress recorded since the initiative was inaugurated about eight months ago, Salako said governance structures had largely been put in place while electrification projects continued simultaneously across primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities. [...]
The wind power question industrial buyers ask backwards
Everyone asks what wind costs. Wrong question. Ask who should own the asset - same turbines, same site, three very different numbers on your bill depending on how the paperwork's arranged.
Captive: you build it, you own it, you eat the risk. No developer margin, accelerated depreciation, insulated from tariff revisions for 25 years. But capital's locked in an asset unrelated to your business, and now gearbox failures are your problem.
IPP: an IPP wind energy developer owns the plant, you sign a PPA and buy units. Zero capex. You pay a margin for that comfort - often worth it.
Group captive: the middle route people get wrong. Consumers hold 26% equity and draw 51% of generation. Meet both and you skip cross-subsidy surcharge. Miss either in any year and the exemption goes. Seen it happen when a unit's demand dropped.
Industrial Wind Power Plants in Surat work because South Gujarat has dense demand and built-out evacuation. Land aggregation is the slow bit.
Start with your consumption data. Structure follows.
Germany set a record by feeding 12 billion kWh of solar power into the grid in July 2026, highlighting photovoltaics' growing role and the I
Dominion Energy has revised the completion timeline for its 2.6 GW Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project, with the installation of t