#conquesting

[insufficient-focus]

And this is why I’m an instance hopper. 

[ipconsultinggroup-1]

The 9th Circuit rules that a law firm's use of a competitor's trademark in conquesting does not violate the Lanham Act.

The 9th Circuit\u2019s ruling in Lerner & Rowe PC v. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC addresses the limits of trademark protection in online keyword advertising. Accident Law Group (ALG) purchased "Lerner & Rowe" as a Google keyword to display its ads, prompting a trademark infringement lawsuit.

The court found ALG\u2019s actions did not violate the Lanham Act, as there was minimal evidence of consumer confusion (0.216% of users appeared confused based on calls). The ruling emphasized that trademark use in keyword ads is only actionable if it is "misleading and deceptive."

Judge Roopali H. Desai, in a concurrence, urged reconsideration of whether keyword bidding constitutes "use in commerce" under the Lanham Act, highlighting the need for flexibility in addressing emerging digital practices.

Let me know if you'd like tweaks or a different tone! Contact Us DC: [phone] MD: [phone] FL [phone] Website: https://www.ipconsultinggroups.com/ Mail: [email protected] Headquarters: 9009 Shady Grove Ct. Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Branch Office: 7734 16th St, NW Washington DC 20012 Branch Office: Vanderbilt Dr, Bonita Spring, FL 34134