Discover Top Posts Tagged with #conservablr

“Why didn’t Nicolas Cruz get arrested when people said he was going to shoot up a school?”

Because look here dipshit ideally we don’t just use the Constitution when it suits us and then ignore the fuck out of it when it doesn’t. Like liberals want to throw the goddamn book at people for owning guns when we have gone so far into the legality of citizen firearms ownership that we have DIAGRAMMED THE FUCKING SENTENCE for the grammatical clauses but when it comes to the First Amendment it’s like “lol wut.” I mean then these same people attack the President for saying “Fake News” when it’s been an understood fact by any American citizen who’s been outside in the last sixty years that the news industry is mostly FOR PROFIT and cares shit-all about creating informed citizenry who can make educated decisions about how to feel about current events. Walter Cronkite should’ve had his vocal chords publicly removed.

So these same people also won’t enforce our laws regarding citizenship, even though that’s outlined in the Constitution. They don’t want to have the electoral college, even though that’s in the fucking Constitution. They want to do all this heinous shit to people they disagree with but holy fuck if you come after their constituency all of a sudden they’re a bunch of goddamn FEDERALIST MINUTEMEN who suck Hamilton’s cock because of a fucking musical.

I swear to God before any of you smug bastards on the right say a goddamn thing you are just as guilty of this shit going on about taxes and Obama and all this other crap for the last ten goddamn years when by our Constitution HE’S THE FUCKING LEGALLY ELECTED 44TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA YOU ABSOLUTE MANIACS DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK YOU CAN PUT ONE OVER ON THE FBI AND THE CIA. No. But oh, somehow, Obama did what THE ENTIRE FUCKING KREMLIN COULDN’T DO IN THE COURSE OF SIXTY FUCKING YEARS OF COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE WORK.

Like it drives me insane just how bastshit blind you people are to basic fucking common horse sense because you refuse to recognize any viewpoint that isn’t your own and you’ve given yourself so far over to identitarian discourse because shouting at people online - YES I KNOW THAT’S WHAT I’M DOING RIGHT NOW FUCK OFF - is more cathartic than sitting down and actually doing your homework on these issues to find real goddamn solutions to problems like the wage gap that isn’t either ship the Blacks to Africa or literally steal from any White family that owns land and makes over 24k a year. Somehow you literally think these are good ideas. Somehow.

You can’t champion the fucking foundational legal document whenever it suits you and insinuate you’re the Arch-Patriot when we were started by people like John I’ll-Kneel-To-The-French-When-Those-Goddamn-Frogs-Make-Me Adams hated the shit out of the British but he would still defend the sentries at the Boston Massacre because THEY WERE IN THEIR LEGAL FUCKING RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THE ANGRY MOB even though he was pretty much at that moment sold on the idea of Independence by any means necessary.

You people are literally the reason our government is going to try and strip all our freedoms piecemeal because you can’t even be trusted to not try and use your toasters in the fucking shower and dead people can’t pay fucking taxes.

#parkland #conservablr #gunblr #columbiablr #fedblr #dixieblr #unionblr #guns #constitution #us politics #american politics

#politics #conservablr #conservative #conservative news

People who unironically call themselves socialist are now in favor of accepting refugees from Venezuela.

#freedoms #conservablr

If the original purpose of the Second Amendment had been maintained and taught - that is, creating a firearms literate and competent Nation-at-Arms which can be mobilized to protect our interests, lives, and property - we would have demonstrably fewer problems with firearms than we do now.

Kids would be taught the importance of our right to bear arms and how scandalizing it insults our founders and the men who died for such a precious right.

Kids would be taught how to properly - and when - to use lethal force, maintain their weapons, and use them as such that they are deadly to their enemies and harmless to their friends.

We would have far more competent law enforfement and military. You would see far fewer instances of police brutality, civilian violence, and military misuse of firepower.

Instead if we don't correct this what will happen is the Fed will be forced to come down on firearm ownership. We will have no other option to keep our streets save, the same way a father is forced to take his son's BB gun because he shoots at people's pets. Except the Fed is going to ruffle the feathers of radicals who have gone unchallenged, monopolized the conversation about the Second Amendment, and as such their so-called patriotism has only further damaged our nation's moral integrity at a time when we desperately need it.

#columbiablr #second amendment #florida #shooting #gunblr #conservablr #freeblr #dixieblr

Major Edmund Rice leading the 19th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry Regiment engages the 14th Virginia Infantry by Dale Gallon.

#columbiablr #major edmund rice #19th Massachusetts volunteer infantry #14th Virginia Infantry #Dale Gallon #union #unionblr #american civil war #dixieblr #freeblr #conservablr #american military art #american high art #american art #american civil war art #american artists

The Las Vegas Shooting

The Las Vegas Shooting is an anomaly among mass shootings in recent years. There seems to have been none if any political motive. There was no affiliation with terrorist groups. Just one angry man shooting into a mass of people. There is no demon to exorcise, no boogeyman to blame; just humanity’s fallen nature and how our rights in this country can be abused and nearly discredited by one man. What good is a “right” if it outlives its purpose and hurts our people? What “right” does it have to exist, and who’s “rights” exactly does it defend? The Founding Fathers did not entrust us with the right to bear arms so we could turn them on our countrymen. So why did they?

To protect this country from enemies foreign and domestic - and yes, a mass shooter is a domestic terrorist and an enemy of the Republic - with our own resolve and arms. To form a militia, a nation at arms, to rise up and defend our sovereignty. As a traditionalist for me the most important thing when analyzing law is its precedent and why it was established in the first place. However if it no longer serves a purpose then its existence is pointless and should be done away with. So do I advocate this for the Second Amendment? Not so. I do, however, think the Second Amendment has been hijacked by seditious groups who only serve to further an argument for the repeal of the Second Amendment. If God gave us that right, it is government who enforces it in fact. We are not Ancient Israel, with God following us around in a pillar of flame directly telling us what to do and when. In reality it is the Federal Republic that protects our rights in law and from being taken by foreign overlords; its maintenance is critical to our freedom for it is the only vessel by which we can navigate the treacherous waters of the world and America ought expect every man to do his duty to keep Columbia sailing. Ergo, I would like to actually talk about a system that would enable us to keep our right to bear arms and return it to its pure purpose and fix the problems in our gun laws in this country. I’d like to call this policy the Minuteman Program, because it derives its inspiration from the Minutemen who have since their existence formed the bedrock of our idea of why we should have the right to bear arms at all. Firstly we need a National Firearms Code. People often ask how gun control can work if Chicago which has very strict gun control is subject to so much gun violence. The answer is that neighboring states of Illinois have much more liberal gun laws and smugglers make a living funneling illegal firearms from these places to criminals and their organizations - if any - for their use. Gun control might work if it was on a national scale but as it stands by and large most states have varying gun laws and even different municipalities have at-odds legislation centering around firearm ownership and use. What I propose with this Firearms Code is actually a wider array of options for firearm ownership; if you can afford market prices, you can most certainly own it. Wanna buy an artillery emplacement? If you can afford it, go right ahead. Of course we would also need universal safety standards for such weapons, but that’s covered in my next part of this program. Second, firearms ownership needs to be bound up in the idea of a Nation at Arms that can defend the State and the Republic’s interests; our mutual safety and the independence and good order of our society. Everyone who would own firearms of any kind - beyond perhaps small arms and personal defense weapons - must apply through the government to obtain a license and permit which they will only receive after meeting various mental health, proficiency, safety, and firearms knowledge requirements. This proficiency will also extend to personal fitness, forcing every American to be able to in the least pass something as simple as MEPs or a basic military fitness test. Upon obtaining a license, for any kind of firearm the person wishes to own they must pass different tests both written and practical for each class of firearm. For example the tests for a handgun would be different than the ones for a rifle. They must at that time register their gun, giving full account of its condition, modifications, and the exact amount of ammunition they have on hand for said firearm and the manner of their storage - which must also meet safety guidelines to ensure the weapon would maintain its proficiency and not be a danger to anyone in their household. This could be extended to accessories such as tactical equipment like bullet proof vests and even blades designed for the purpose of defending oneself and if need be killing an opponent. The purpose of such legislation is to ensure that in case of a crisis requiring men-at-arms who can be called up much like selective service or a draft, a ready number are on hand who can be called upon by their locality at any time and given assignment for which they will be financially compensated for their time on duty. Foreign invasion, terrorist attack, or any crisis that requires men who can be ready in a minute for conflict who are trained in the use of their firearms and placed under the direct control of professionals. The flip-side of this is that if one is deemed unfit for service or no longer able to serve they would lose their right to bear arms. I feel a distinction should be made between “sporting” firearms and “military” firearms of some kind to allow for hunters and the like. No one is going to war with a single-shot .306. Many weapons would be absolutely useless on a modern battlefield or a liability and should not be used. Perhaps the older civil firearms code is still adequate for them. One must renew his oath to defend the Republic from its enemies foreign and domestic every year as well as pass the same tests - if not more advanced ones - than the ones he was previously subjected to. In return for this, said person has unrestricted right to bear arms which would function similarly to open carry laws with it being the discretion of private and public institutions whether or not they will allow a person to be on the premises with their weapons. He must keep his identification as a Minuteman on his person at all times, especially if he is armed. Failure to do so should resort in fines and other penalties. Naturally anyone who shows open contempt for the US government as an institution and threatens it with violence or keeps his firearms with intent to overthrow the government should not be allowed to keep and bear arms. If the founders intended us to violently overthrow the government every time something political we didn’t like happened, I daresay they would’ve done it to each other quite a bit in the early years of our Republic when many of them stood in political opposition to each other on various issues including presidential elections. Another caveat is that I feel like such a system should only apply to the next generation, not the current one of firearm owners. Grandfather clauses and all that should be employed to ease the transition; that way, no one’s rights as they have understood them are being trampled underfoot. To me this is the best compromise which allows for a greater sense of safety and trust in our fellow Americans while not infringing upon our ancestral right to bear arms. I feel like every time one of these tragedies rolls around people are more concerned with virtue-signalling and such than actually talking about a way to stop these things from happening. So I hope this gains traction and people start to think more seriously about how we can change our gun culture in such a way as to be more true to the intention of the second amendment and make our Republic domestically safer and stronger.