May 18, 2025
Never forget!
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Angola
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from China
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from United States
seen from Germany
Never forget!
NO FILTER NO EDIT RAW #conspiracytheory #covid19 #facts #nonfiction #factsoverfiction #youtube #covidhoax #plandemic #bs #sheep #conspiracy #science #fakenews #alternatefacts #gfy #youfailedscience #getalife #useyourhead #sheeple #staysafe #dicknosey (at The Hamptons) https://www.instagram.com/p/CAYP1gYATgC/?igshid=kw46z570yw5u
People need to stop saying this virus is a hoaxes for an election because the pain in my lungs keeping me up right now can tell you different!!! The fire in them every time I cough can prove you wrong!!!
Never forget!
Bill Gates held “Top Secret” security clearance in US Federal agencies for 7 years
A few days ago, Senator Rand Paul released documents that showed Bill Gates was issued a Q clearance by the US Department of Energy (“DOE”). Gates held this high-level clearance from 2014 to 2021.
DOE describes a Q authorisation as “equivalent to Top Secret … with a Q an individual can be given access to Top Secret National Security Information if his or her duties require it.”
"If you have a current, Top-Secret security clearance … The access authorisation will be granted based on 'reciprocity': the principle that a security clearance or access authorisation at the same level granted by any authorised Federal agency must be recognised and accepted by all other agencies,” DOE explains.
The following is a thread posted on Twitter (now X) by Rand Paul on 31 July 2026.
Related: Rand Paul’s Bill Gates File Dump Shows a Q Clearance and Fauci Editing His Pandemic Playbook, RedState, 31 July 2026
Bill Gates Had a Q Clearance and a Private Editor at NIH
By Senator Rand Paul
Across nearly twenty years, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (“BMGF”) built a relationship with the Federal government that ran on personal access as much as formal partnership. I'm releasing the documents.
Bill Gates held a Department of Energy "Q" security clearance for seven years, including during the height of the covid-19 pandemic. DOE confirmed his clearance "was reciprocally granted on 11 June 2014, and subsequently terminated on 6 December 2021."
A "Q" clearance permits access to Top Secret Restricted Data of the US Government.
With the help of David Morens, Anthony Fauci served as Bill Gates's private editor.
In April 2020, Gates asked Fauci for feedback on his memo "Pandemic I: The First Modern Pandemic." In January 2022, Gates asked Fauci to edit his book before it went to the publisher.
Fauci returned tracked changes, then wrote: "I gave the manuscript in close confidence to a trusted colleague who destroyed it after reading it. His name is Dr. David Morens."
When the NIH Director asked what his agency's ties to the Gates Foundation were, the answer came back that the foundation had been funding pieces of NIH.
Francis Collins emailed Fauci and senior staff: "For reasons I can't currently explain, I need answers to the following: 1) are we giving any grants to BMGF (I assume no) 2) what are our current collaborative projects with BMGF?"
NIH's internal review reported the foundation had never applied for an NIH grant, but that "BMGF has funded various components of NIH."
Collins was then called to an Oval Office meeting with no stated agenda. He asked: "Is this coordinated in some way, or is Bill going rogue?"
DARPA gave the Gates Foundation a private briefing on four military biological threat programmes.
On 3 May 2022, DARPA's Biological Technologies Office convened a ninety-minute session at agency headquarters covering INTERCEPT, PREEMPT, Friend or Foe, and ReVector.
PREEMPT's stated aim is "targeting viruses in animals before they emerge in humans." Its projects include bat sampling across four countries and a transmissible Lassa vaccine "with internal off switch," listed for potential deployment in Sierra Leone, Guinea and other West African countries.
Collins told Melinda French Gates he had spent his tenure bringing NIH and the foundation closer together.
Days after Collins announced his resignation, Collins wrote: "It has been a privilege to work with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation over these 12 years, and I am glad to have had the chance to bring our global health efforts even closer together than ever."
Americans deserve transparency from the highest level of their government. I obtained these documents and I released them, and I will keep pulling this thread until the full picture is public.
Read every document: ‘The Reading Room: Documents released by Chairman Rand Paul as part of his ongoing investigation into the origins of COVID-19 and risky taxpayer-funded life sciences research’.
Covid was the largest fraud on UK public funds in modern history
The UK government admits that £10.9 billion was lost to fraud across covid support schemes. However, research has shown that, plausibly, there was £37 billion lost to covid fraud.
We Warned About Covid Fraud Four Years Ago. Now the Government Agrees
By Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, as published by Trust the Evidence
In June 2026, the Government quietly published its response to the Covid Counter Fraud Commissioner’s report. It deserves far more attention than it has received. Buried within its 28 pages is an extraordinary admission: the British state was systematically unprepared for the largest fraud against the public purse in modern history.
Four years ago, in November 2022, Trust the Evidence published a detailed investigation into covid fraud. We argued that the losses were likely to be vastly greater than official estimates, that fraud controls had been abandoned in the rush to spend, that responsibility was fragmented across Whitehall, that Companies House had become an enabler rather than a barrier to fraud, and that the Government lacked both the appetite and the institutional machinery to recover what had been stolen.
The Government has now accepted almost every one of those arguments.
It is gratifying to be proved right; It is rather less gratifying that it has taken four years.
The official estimate now stands at £10.9 billion lost to fraud and error across Covid support schemes, although the Public Sector Fraud Authority acknowledges that the true losses are likely higher. Only £1.8 billion has been recovered so far.
But here lies the first problem.
The Government continues to rely on a remarkably conservative accounting framework. It counts losses that can be demonstrated within individual schemes, but not the broader ecosystem of fraud that flourished when normal controls were suspended.
Our analysis took a different approach: We assembled evidence from National Audit Office reports, Public Accounts Committee hearings, Treasury evidence, Lord Agnew’s testimony, HMRC data, Companies House records, Action Fraud, Freedom of Information requests and contemporaneous investigative reporting. Rather than viewing each scheme in isolation, we examined the entire pandemic spending landscape.
The picture that emerged was alarming.
We estimated that losses could plausibly approach 10 per cent of the £370 billion pandemic expenditure—around £37 billion. That estimate included not only identified fraud but also the predictable consequences of dismantling verification systems, encouraging self-certification, creating 100 per cent government-backed lending, relaxing welfare controls, and allowing thousands of new companies to be created with minimal scrutiny.
That estimate was criticised at the time as speculative. Indeed, the government put in a complaint, making sure it wasn’t backed by the University of Oxford - instead, it was just the two old geezers .
Yet the Government’s own report now accepts virtually every mechanism that underpinned our analysis.
It acknowledges that fraud controls were not embedded in emergency planning. It accepts that crisis decision-making lacked effective challenge. It admits data sharing between departments was inadequate. It proposes reforms to Companies House. It expands counter-fraud powers. It establishes specialist investigation teams. It creates independent oversight. It rewrites Treasury guidance so that fraud is considered from the outset of future emergency schemes.
In other words, today’s official reform agenda reads remarkably like yesterday’s unofficial diagnosis.
One of the most striking examples concerns Companies House.
In 2022, we analysed incorporation data and found tens of thousands more companies had been created than historical trends would predict, while dissolutions temporarily fell, leaving almost 400,000 additional companies on the register. We never claimed these were all fraudulent. But they represented precisely the sort of anomaly that deserved urgent investigation because they coincided with schemes requiring little more than an email address and a newly registered company to obtain taxpayer-backed loans.
The Government now accepts that greater corporate transparency is essential for preventing future fraud. It has not gone as far as the Commissioner recommended, but even partial acceptance represents a remarkable shift from the complacency that characterised the pandemic years.
Equally revealing is the treatment of Lord Agnew’s evidence.
When he resigned in 2022, describing Treasury anti-fraud efforts as “Dad’s Army,” many regarded the criticism as a rhetorical flourish. We treated it as a warning from someone who had seen the machinery from inside the Government. His evidence highlighted fragmented responsibilities, inexperienced decision-makers and the abandonment of basic checks that would have delayed payments by only a matter of days.
Covid: Government's anti-fraud efforts was like Dad's Army operation, says ex-minister, BBC, 9 March 2022
The Government has now built an entire reform programme around precisely those deficiencies. However, the true scale of the losses remains unresolved.
The official £10.9 billion figure has an air of precision that is difficult to justify. Fraud on this scale cannot be measured like the national debt. Much of it remains undiscovered; some will never be discovered. Fraudsters dissolved companies, transferred assets abroad, exploited identity theft and took advantage of administrative systems that often lacked even basic verification. Estimating only what has already been identified risks confusing measurement with reality.
Our estimate was necessarily broader because the problem itself was broader. We were trying to understand the consequences of designing emergency programmes in an environment where ministers knowingly accepted weakened controls, existing fraud levels were already estimated at tens of billions annually, and experienced investigators warned repeatedly that criminal organisations were exploiting the opportunities being created.
No estimate is perfect, but an estimate that incorporates systemic vulnerabilities is arguably more likely to approximate the truth than one confined to losses that have been formally recognised so far.
Much of the Government’s response focuses on ensuring the mistakes are never repeated. New legislation, new investigators, new guidance, new oversight panels, new professional standards and new crisis playbooks are all welcome.
Yet, if these reforms are now considered essential, why were those warning about precisely these deficiencies dismissed four years ago?
Covid fraud was never simply a story about clever criminals. It was a story about predictable institutional failure. Trust the Evidence recognised that in 2022; the Government has now acknowledged it in 2026.
Better late than never, perhaps; but four years is a very long time in which to discover that independent investigators had seen the problem more clearly than the state itself - and that taxpayers are still paying the price.
About the Authors
Carl Heneghan is a professor of Evidence-based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (“CEBM”) and NHS Urgent Care general practitioner (“GP”) who regularly appears in the media. Tom Jefferson is a clinical epidemiologist and a Senior Associate Tutor at the University of Oxford. Together, they publish articles on a Substack page titled ‘Trust the Evidence’.
Featured image taken from ‘£21bn of public money lost in fraud since covid pandemic began and most will never be recovered’, Sky News, 30 March 2023
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: Why and how I will get out of jail within four to five weeks at the latest
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has filed a civil complaint. As a result, he expects to be released from prison within four to five weeks. In a recent statement, he explained why and how.
His case is based on the fact that he was abducted in Mexico by the German Department of the Interior, which is a clear case of political persecution and a violation of Article 16 of the German Constitution.
Dr. Fuellmich has support from the public worldwide which he believes will make a crucial difference in his case. He believes the success in his case will also make a crucial difference in the cases of medical doctors in Germany who spoke out against the covid fraud and have been subjected to the same political persecution by the state.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a German lawyer and was the primary spokesman for the Corona Investigative Committee until he left the organisation and founded International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) to continue his investigations into the global covid fraud.
Dr. Fuellmich (also spelt Füllmich) has been incarcerated in a German prison on trumped-up charges since October 2023 after being abducted from Mexico by agents of the German state. He was held in solitary confinement before his sentencing.
In April 2025, Dr. Fuellmich was sentenced to three years and nine months in prison and his law license was revoked following false allegations of embezzling funds from the Corona Investigative Committee.
Further reading:
- The Full Story of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Principia Scientific, 7 July 2025 - Dr Reiner Fuellmich: A Persecuted Hero of the Resistance, Bert Olivier, August 2025 - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Totality of Evidence, updated 3 April 2026
Periodically, Dr. Fuellmich publishes a statement or update on his Substack page. The following is his latest statement.
New Statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
By Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, 18 May 2026 (uploaded on 22 May 2026)
Dear Friends,
With this statement, I’ll explain to you why and how I will get out of here within four to five weeks at the latest, and why and how this fake case will finally and for good be thrown out within that same period of time. I’ll try to make this as short and understandable as possible. And I’ll also inform you about a 22-page dossier about me, two-thirds of which are redacted. Still, it proves that it was the German Department of the Interior which had me abducted in Mexico for their long-planned political persecution. It was the Department of the Interior by using the German domestic terrorist organisation Constitutional Protection Agency and the German counterpart of the FBI, BKA.
But let me start with a piece of information that I have been withholding concerning the civil complaint for damages. Damages are not limited to monetary damages. Rather, damages can include injunctions, that is court orders to do something or not do something. In my case, it is the court ordering the defendant, the State of Lower Saxony and the German government, as the employers of the criminal judges, prosecutors and other public officials, to one: Immediately and finally release me from prison and two: Immediately and finally throw the fake criminal charges against me out. How did it come to this? Well, once I understood that the Goettingen Court is totally corrupt and that puppet judges and prosecutors were not even listening to anything we said, I decided to switch from defence to offence. And I wrote that 166-page criminal complaint, which will ultimately lead to the punishment of the criminals involved in my abduction and incarceration and the dissolution of dozens of public agencies, such as the above mentioned domestic intelligence service CPA, which in reality is a terrorist group, as not only my case shows.
However, at the same time, I was well aware of the fact that the German criminal justice system is almost completely controlled by the Deep State. This is not only true for the many prosecutors who have to follow political orders. That’s why the European Supreme Court on 27 May 2019, decided that German prosecutors must not issue European arrest warrants, as there is always the danger that they will be ordered to go after political opponents with fake charges. This has been happening to the political party AfD, which now has the support of 30% of the people, while the ruling CDU is down to a mere 22% because it has been destroyed by the inept Deep State puppets maps. But German judges are not independent either. Rather, once a year, the presidents of all the German courts write a kind of progress report or personal assessment for all the judges in their court. And these presidents are hybrids, half judge and half politician.
So, in order to circumvent this problem within the criminal justice system and to make sure that my criminal complaint will go forward, I filed the now well-known civil complaint for damages. Civil tort law is the road to damages, when someone suffers damage because of negligent or intentional acts of another. Civil court law is, of course, or has been, my special area of expertise for more than 30 years. You might say, therefore, that these dudes really did mess with the wrong guy and his friends from all over the world. Now, pretty much everyone thought that my civil complaint for damages has only been filed because I want monetary damages, that is, money. But that is not the case. As in truth, this case focuses not so much on money, but on the two above-mentioned injunctions to enjoin or prohibit the State of Lower Saxony from keeping me in prison any longer and from continuing with their fake criminal proceeding against me.
How did it come to these two new so-called prayers for relief, which means requests that the court enter judgment in my favour for permanent injunctive relief, prohibiting the State of Lower Saxony from keeping me in prison and continuing with the fake criminal proceedings against me? Well, this is all because of the illegal and unconstitutional political persecution against me and hinges on the very unusual fact that I was abducted in Mexico by the German Deep State. It is precisely this abduction which is now going to break the monsters and their puppets' backs. Because According to Article 16 of the German Constitution, it is unconstitutional to extradite a German unless basic principles of the rule of law, basic principles of the rule of law are adhered to. And as both the German Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court and all legal scholars agree, political persecution, which is a crime in and of itself, is the very definition of unlawful persecution by a country not abiding by the basic principles of the rule of law.
In my case, it is more than obvious that this is indeed a clear-cut case of political persecution. But this is also true in all those cases where medical doctors were incarcerated and/or lost their licenses to practice medicine, which happened in more than a thousand cases. In their cases too, fake criminal charges were invented to create the impression that they were criminals and to hide the fact that in reality they were all politically persecuted because their actions, their attempts to protect their patients from harm, as the Hippocratic oath they all took demands, contradicted the government’s, that is the Deep State’s, push to get everyone vaccinated with a toxic brew that would ultimately kill and maim millions, probably billions of people worldwide. RFK Jr. was, of course, aware of all this when he wrote a letter to his German counterpart asking her to stop this kind of political persecution of those doctors.
The crucial difference between my case and their case is that I was abducted for political persecution. Abducted. And all of a sudden article 16 of the German Constitution comes into play and shines a bright spotlight on the unconstitutionality of extraditions for political persecution. I don’t need to explain that if extraditions for political persecution are unconstitutional, then outright abductions for political persecution are even more unconstitutional, of course. And this is even more true if an extradition proceeding is intentionally bypassed as the prosecution’s case file meticulously details - so German - and exposes through the email exchange between the BKA/FBI officer in Mexico City warning the German Deep State that I cannot just be arrested for nothing in Mexico. But instead, he advised his superiors in Germany that they should start an extradition proceeding. They refused and had me abducted because a formal extradition proceeding would have given me a fair hearing and I would have exposed the fake arrest warrant as a deliberately fake arrest warrant.
So, what does this blatant violation of my constitutional rights as guaranteed in Article 16 of the Constitution mean? Well, this directly translates into claims for damages under civil tort law, my very area of expertise for more than 30 years. Again, they picked the wrong guy for this. Civil tort law’s cornerstone for holding public employees, in particular judges and prosecutors, to account for serious torts they commit in office is section 839 of the German Civil Code. Judges, however, are only liable for serious crimes, that is, felonies they commit in office. That is not a problem. That is not a problem at all in Judge Schindler’s case, as his crimes, starting with his attempts to make the abduction into a Mexican case of deportation, continuing on with his exchanging the original charges when they had collapsed for new freely invented fake charges, and immediately stopping the hearing so that the defence wouldn’t be able to refute his idiotic new fantasies, and finally ordering the prison directors to subject me to severe measures of white torture. Without any doubt whatsoever, all of this amounts to very serious felonies.
Section 839 of the German Civil Code was actually designed to take down criminals inside the system, in particular criminals inside the criminal justice system, and hold them to account. They will lose everything, including their pensions. I don’t mean to bore you with legal intricacies, but just so that you can check all this for yourselves if you want, let me add one more thing. Damages are not limited to money damages, but also include, as I said before, via section 1004 of the German Civil Code, injunctions as explained above, meaning permanent injunctive relief by ordering the State of Lower Saxony to both release me from prison immediately and permanently, and to immediately and permanently stop the illegal and unconstitutional criminal proceeding against me.
But there’s one final problem. How can I make sure that the civil tort law case, and my prayers or requests for the above-described injunctive release, are not slow-walked to death by the court granting the defendant all kinds of extensions for their answer to my complaint? Easy. That’s what preliminary injunctions are there for. In very urgent cases, what you do is you file a motion for a preliminary injunction. And with such a motion, you explain to the court by way of affidavits, as there’s no time to actually hear witnesses, that the matter before the court is urgently needed to be preliminarily solved, because there’s no time to wait for the outcome of the main civil complaint. In my case, this is obvious, as every second of my imprisonment damages me more, traumatises me more and is very expensive for the State of Lower Saxony, as they will have to pay even more monetary damages to me and my wife and my family.
What does urgent preliminary ruling mean in terms of time? Depends on the circumstances. But in my case, the court will have to rule on this motion for a preliminary decision within seven to 10 days. This can happen without an oral hearing, as time is clearly of the essence after now more than two and a half years of patently illegal pretrial detention. Now, if the deep state wants to play for time and urges the court to rule against me by, for example, desperately claiming that I’m not a human being, but a squirrel that has no standing in a court of law, this may slow things down for a few days, but no more than another five to 10 days, by which time the court will, because we will immediately appeal and file a motion to schedule a hearing, the court will have to do this. Schedule a hearing. The courtroom will be full with my supporters and thousands of others all over the world. My international friends everywhere will rise up in protest.
Most importantly, I will have succeeded in forcing the German Deep State to take down their masks and expose Germany as what it has become, a totalitarian, lawless country run by monsters. It will all be out in the open, ready for all those boomerangs of real justice to move in and find their targets. Now, on top of this, I have just received a 22-page dossier on me, written by the German Department of the Interior and its henchmen from the German domestic terrorist organisation CPA and the BKA/ FBI. Two-thirds of this dossier are redacted black pages, which, of course, is totally illegal. Nevertheless, it is now 100% certain that it was not the Department of Justice, which is normally in charge when it comes to extraditions of alleged criminals, but the Department of the Interior, which is in charge when extraditions and abductions for political persecutions are required by the Deep State.
This means that the then Secretary of the Interior, Nancy Faser, will be held to account, plus all her employees of the CPA, the Domestic Intelligence Service and the BKA, the equivalent of the FBI. By the way, only one political party came to my aid with one of their Members of Parliament, demanding to know from the BKA why the government was withholding my file from me and my attorneys and reminding them that both according to applicable EU law and according to German law, of course, I have a right to receive any and all information the government has on me, unredacted and uncensored, of course. All the other political parties in Germany did, of course, help the Deep State destroy the rule of law in Germany. We have already advised the German Supreme Court, whose ruling on our appeal is expected shortly, of both our civil complaint and the motion for a preliminary injunction.
This will be the very last chance for those judges and prosecutors who have thus far stood by silently watching the rule of law being destroyed before their eyes, but may now decide to break their silence because they lose their fear, realising that anyone can be next, including themselves. The realisation that I’m not alone, but that the international public is standing by me, will, I believe, make a crucial difference. And when I get out, all those doctors will get out too, and will receive full compensatory damages.
After reading all this, I’m sure you understand why I am saying that I’ll see you all very, very soon, my friends. And then I’ll explain to you what Peter Frampton’s song “Baby, I love your way” really means.
Write a letter and/or postcard to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:
JVA Bremervoerde Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Am Steinberg 75 D - 27432 Bremervoerde Germany
Note: Only letters and postcards are delivered to Reiner. Reiner cannot receive parcels and books.
If you would like to communicate directly with Inka Fuellmich and send support for Reiner’s freedom, please send your letter and/or check to the following address:
Inka Fuellmich c/o Daisy Papp Mindset Evolution Foundation 13300 S Cleveland Ave Suite 56 Fort Myers, FL 33907 USA
Please be sure to include “Suite 56” in the address to ensure delivery. Your letter will be forwarded to Inka Fuellmich and your support is deposited in the Mindset Evolution Foundation’s special bank account for Reiner’s freedom.
Note: Checks can be processed successfully when you write your check “Pay in the order of:” Daisy Papp Mindset Evolution Foundation. Write in the memo Inka and Reiner. Thank you.
Thank you for all your support.
We have received checks that were not filled out correctly. Please make sure you fill out your check as shown in the sample so that your generous help and support for Reiner’s Freedom can be accepted by the financial institution and deposited into Reiner’s Freedom account.
The Fuellmich couple Reiner and Inka, with the family dogs Annie and Jimbo, appreciate your consideration of donating and helping for Reiner’s freedom. Funds build Reiner’s freedom now.
You can safely and easily send support for Reiner’s freedom with debit or credit card and/ or PayPal: https://daisypapp.com/dr-reiner-fuellmich
You can safely and easily send help for Reiner in cryptocurrency here: https://nowpayments.io/donation/Together
You can support Reiner’s freedom safely and easily here on the ICIC.LAW website: https://icic.law
The Fuellmich couple appreciates your donation and help for Reiner’s freedom. Funds support Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s freedom. Thank you Thank you Thank you
Now it is more important than ever that the many good people who are working for the good for humankind, stand together and spread Reiner’s message that we are strong together.
For Reiner’s freedom, for humanity’s freedom the Together369 shop is now available. Inka stated: “Geschenke für ein liebevolles Miteinander” which translates to English as “Gifts for a loving togetherness.”
Feel free to share and repost far and wide. Together for each other. Together we are strong: https://www.etsy.com/shop/Together369. All proceeds support officially and actively Reiner’s Freedom. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you
"Safe and effective" is a marketing slogan, not a scientific conclusion
"Safe and effective" was a marketing slogan, not a scientific conclusion. The manufacturers' own trial data showed excess serious adverse events. The regulator's own active monitoring found 1 in 7 people reporting medically serious reactions. The largest safety study ever conducted confirmed every major signal dissenting doctors were destroyed for raising. The immune mechanism data shows repeated doses may have been counterproductive. Two of the three products have been withdrawn.
Medical professionals' own faith in vaccines has been rattled, with uptake of the covid-19 vaccine among healthcare workers during 2024/25 down to less than 12 per cent. Flu vaccine uptake has also fallen from 71% in 2022 to 45% in 2025.
And the Irish State - which effectively enforced vaccination - has not conducted a single study, review or investigation into any of the harms that have been documented at scale around the globe, Paul Madden writes.
Trust the Science Part 8: The Data They're Not Discussing
By Paul Madden, 7 May 2026
Table of Contents
- The Data- 1. One in Seven - 2. The Manufacturers’ Own Trial Data - 3. 99 Million People - 4. Nearly 30% of Teenagers Had Cardiovascular Effects - 5. Your Immune System Is Learning to Ignore the Virus - 6. What’s in the Vial - 7. Cancer Signals - What All This Means - The Silence - Safe and Effective? - Trust the Science? - About the Author The Data
You know someone. Everyone does now.
Someone who was perfectly healthy before taking a Covid vaccine and hasn’t been right since. Someone whose heart races all of a sudden for no reason. An uncle who developed tinnitus overnight. A sister whose periods changed. A parent who keeps catching Covid despite doing everything they were told. A healthy young person who died suddenly and nobody can explain why.
Over the last five years, you have witnessed or been told of tales like these. Coincidences. Anxiety. Long Covid. Bad luck. You have been told that the science is settled, that the vaccines are safe and effective, and that anyone who questions this is peddling misinformation. There is a convenience in not confronting the reality, a bliss in the ignorance.
The final instalment of this 8-part series presents the published, peer-reviewed, institutional science that your government, your health service and your media are not discussing. These are not conspiratorial claims or fringe studies from obscure journals. They are published in the most prestigious medical and scientific journals in the world — Science Immunology, Vaccine, Drug Safety, Nature Scientific Reports, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, and the Journal of Infection. They are authored by researchers at the Cleveland Clinic, the Global Vaccine Data Network, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Stanford University, UCLA, Mahidol University, and the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark. They are peer-reviewed, open access and publicly available.
No Irish media outlet or public body has cited any of them. The HPRA has not referenced them. The HSE has not acted on them. The Covid Evaluation excluded vaccine adverse outcomes from its terms of reference. And no mainstream Irish journalist has reported on their startling findings to any degree of depth.
The most damning aspect of what is outlined below is that real scientists warned what might happen before these vaccines rolled out. Others flagged concerns and worrying trends as vaccines were being administered. They were systematically silenced.
1. One in Seven
In September 2025, the UK’s own medicines regulator — the MHRA — published the results of its Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor in Drug Safety, a Springer pharmacovigilance journal. This was not passive reporting, where people voluntarily submit complaints. This was active surveillance: the MHRA invited vaccinated people to register, then followed up with them at set intervals to ask what had happened.
Of 30,281 people who reported receiving a vaccine and were actively monitored, 52.1% reported at least one adverse reaction. And 13.7% — approximately one in seven — reported an event classified as medically serious.
One in seven people in the study suffered a serious medical event. Three people who registered to be actively monitored after vaccination were subsequently recorded as dead. 1 in 303 people observed had reported their heart pounding. 269 people reporting neurological sensation changes — nearly 1 in 100 of those observed in the study. 1 in 130 people reported issues with their lymphatic system. 1 in 145 had developed eye disorders, including visual impairment and 1 case of blindness. You don't expect eye pain from an intramuscular injection.
The study’s own conclusion described the data as supporting “a favourable safety profile.” The authors noted that most reactions were “expected acute reactions” — meaning they were consistent with what clinical trials had already identified. But had people been warned of the potential for acute reactions. Can you recall your doctor sitting down with you to explain what might happen if you took the vaccine? Or was it more straightforward than that? Roll up the sleeve, pin prick, see you in two weeks for a top-up.
The consistency with expectations does nothing to reduce the scale of damage. If you vaccinate five million people and one in seven experiences a medically serious event, that is over 700,000 people. This study was conducted by the UK regulator, published under the names of MHRA staff, and is freely available online. It has not been reported by any Irish media outlet.
2. The Manufacturers’ Own Trial Data
Before the vaccines were authorised, Pfizer and Moderna conducted Phase III clinical trials on which the Emergency Use Authorisations were based. In 2022, a team of independent researchers — from UCLA, Stanford, Bond University, and the University of Maryland — re-analysed the serious adverse event data from those same trials. Their study was published in Vaccine, the leading immunisation journal. It can also be found here on PubMed.
These independent researchers used the Brighton Collaboration’s own list of adverse events of special interest — the same list the WHO had endorsed as the standard for monitoring vaccine safety. They found that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest: 10.1 per 10,000 for Pfizer and 15.1 per 10,000 for Moderna, over and above the placebo group.
In plain English, in the manufacturers’ own trials, the vaccinated group experienced more serious adverse events than the unvaccinated group at a rate of 10 and 15 to 1. The excess risk of serious harm from the vaccine was in the same range as the reduction in Covid hospitalisations the vaccine provided. The authors called for “formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes.” Stratified means broken down by age and health status — so that we could know whether a healthy 25-year-old faced more risk from the vaccine than from the virus.
Those analyses were never conducted. Not by Pfizer, not by Moderna, not by the EMA, not by the HPRA, and not by any Irish health body.
3. 99 Million People
In February 2024, the Global Vaccine Data Network — a WHO-aligned international collaboration spanning ten sites across eight countries — published the largest vaccine safety study ever conducted. It covered 99 million vaccinated individuals and was published in Vaccine. The study included patients from Scotland, New Zealand, France, Australia, Finland, Denmark and Canada.
The study confirmed statistically significant safety signals for myocarditis and pericarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle and the sac around the heart — after all three major vaccine brands (Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca). It confirmed Guillain-Barré syndrome — a condition where the immune system attacks the nerves, causing weakness and sometimes paralysis — after AstraZeneca. It confirmed cerebral venous sinus thrombosis — a type of blood clot in the brain — after AstraZeneca. And it identified new potential signals for transverse myelitis (spinal cord inflammation) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (brain and spinal cord inflammation) that the authors said “require further investigation.”
Every major safety signal that dissenting doctors had been censored for raising was confirmed by the largest study ever conducted. The “further investigation” the authors recommended has not been conducted by the HSE.
This study only looked for 13 specific conditions. It did not look for lymphadenopathy (which the MHRA found in 1 in 129 people), eye disorders, menstrual disorders, tinnitus, paraesthesia, or any of the dozens of other reactions the MHRA's OSM Resource 8 documented.
4. Nearly 30% of Teenagers Had Cardiovascular Effects
In 2022, researchers at Mahidol University in Bangkok, Thailand, did something no Western regulator had done. They took baseline cardiac measurements — ECG, echocardiography, and cardiac biomarker blood tests — from 301 Thai adolescents aged 13 to 18 before their second Pfizer dose, then monitored them at 3, 7, and 14 days afterwards. Published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease and available here to review.
Cardiovascular effects were found in 29.24% of participants. Nearly one in three teenagers who took the vaccine experienced heart trouble. The most common were a resting heart rate over 100 beats per minute (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitations (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%), and high blood pressure (3.99%). Seven participants — 2.33% — showed elevated cardiac biomarkers, meaning their blood tests indicated heart muscle damage.
The reason the numbers were so much higher than other studies is because the Thai researchers measured a baseline before vaccination. Without a baseline, you cannot detect subclinical damage — damage that exists but hasn’t yet produced obvious symptoms. Most Western monitoring relied on people presenting themselves to hospitals with symptoms. The Thai study looked for damage whether or not the teenager felt unwell. It found it in nearly a third of them.
The study stated in its conclusions that “the adverse cardiovascular manifestations observed in this adolescent cohort were both mild and transient.” Hopefully that proves true over time, but cardiovascular issues of any sort seems a high price to pay for adolescents with an infection fatality rate (IFR) of about 0.003%. The question of whether or not to vaccinate an adolescent comes down to: if you were told that in order to avoid a 1 in 33,333 chance of death, you had to accept a 1 in 3 chance of heart problems.
Professor Vinay Prasad of UCSF asked the question that should have been asked in every country: “Why isn’t a study like this being done in the US?” It wasn’t done in Ireland either. No baseline cardiac monitoring was conducted on any Irish adolescent before or after vaccination. Therefore, the extent of the damage cannot be accurately determined and pre-empting cardiovascular effects in teenagers and young adults would be a major logistical headache for the health service.
In September 2025 in the UK, this OpenSAFELY study revealed that myocarditis and pericarditis were found exclusively in vaccinated groups. There were ZERO cases of heart problems in the unvaccinated cohort. The study also showed zero Covid-19 deaths in either group across 1.26 million children between the ages of 5 and 15.
5. Your Immune System Is Learning to Ignore the Virus
Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität in Germany published a study in January 2023 in Science Immunology — one of the most prestigious immunology journals in the world — that may explain why so many vaccinated people keep catching Covid.
Your immune system produces different types of antibodies. The ones you want fighting a virus are IgG1 and IgG3 — aggressive, inflammatory antibodies that attack and destroy infected cells. IgG4 is different. It is the antibody associated with immune tolerance — the body learning to live with something rather than fight it. IgG4 is what your immune system produces when it encounters something repeatedly and decides it is not a threat. For example. IgG4 is what beekeepers develop after years of stings — their bodies learn to tolerate the venom rather than react to it. It is the antibody of surrender.
In effect, your immune system produces different types of antibodies to fight infection. Through a process known as class switching, it can change which type it deploys — and repeated mRNA vaccination switched production from aggressive, virus-killing antibodies to passive ones that tell your immune system to stand down.
The German researchers found that after the second mRNA vaccination, IgG4 made up just 0.04% of spike-specific antibodies. After the third dose, it had risen to 19.27%. This shift was not seen after viral vector vaccines (like AstraZeneca) or after natural infection, so only applies to Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.
The mRNA-only group had IgG4 levels thirteen to twenty times higher than the groups that included the adenoviral vector vaccine. The class switch is specific to the mRNA platform. Neither the AstraZeneca vaccine nor natural infection caused the same response. Only repeated mRNA vaccination did.
In simple terms, repeated mRNA vaccination was training the immune system to tolerate the spike protein rather than fight it. The more doses you received, the more your body learned to ignore the very thing the vaccine was supposed to teach it to attack.
A follow-up study published in Nature Scientific Reports in August 2023 added a critical detail: people who had been infected with Covid before vaccination did not show the same IgG4 shift. Their immune systems maintained the aggressive antibody profile. Natural immunity produced a more durable and functional immune response than repeated vaccination alone. Natural immunity was dismissed by NPHET and the vaccine certificate system refused to recognise it as an alternative to vaccination. It functioned better. People who got Covid naturally have a better immune response than people who were vaccinated.
In March 2025, a separate study in the Journal of Infection connected the dots directly: IgG4 class switching was associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The tolerance mechanism was not theoretical. It was measurable, and it was making people more susceptible to the virus.
This is what the Cleveland Clinic found when it studied 51,011 of its own employees: “Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.” The more doses you had, the more likely you were to catch Covid. Published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases (Oxford University Press), peer-reviewed, from the second-ranked hospital in the United States.
If you took three, four, or five doses because you were told each one would protect you better, the published science now suggests the opposite may have occurred. Your immune system may have been progressively trained to tolerate the virus rather than fight it. And no one in authority has told you this, because telling you would mean admitting that the policy of repeated boosting — which was enforced through workplace mandates, vaccine certificates, and social coercion — may have been counterproductive.
6. What’s in the Vial
In 2023, genomics researcher Kevin McKernan made a worrying discovery that has since been independently confirmed by laboratories across three continents. The mRNA vaccines contained a form of DNA contamination — residual plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process — at levels that multiple independent analyses found were hundreds of times above the regulatory safety limits set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US.
This matters because of how the vaccines are made. The clinical trial product was manufactured using a highly purified process. The mass-produced product — the one injected into billions of arms around the world — used a different, cheaper method involving E. coli bacteria. This is the process change that former Pfizer Chief Toxicologist Helmut Sterz described in his testimony to the German Bundestag, which we covered earlier in Part 3.
The contaminating DNA was not just present — it was encapsulated inside the lipid nanoparticles that deliver the mRNA into your cells. This means the DNA was packaged in the same delivery system as the active ingredient, giving it a direct route into human cells. Among the DNA sequences found was the SV40 promoter-enhancer — a genetic element historically used in cancer research to switch genes on.
Phillip Buckhaults, a cancer genomics professor at the University of South Carolina, set out to disprove McKernan’s findings.