Jan 21, 2013
wait what? cumberbatch is going to be on the simpsons?
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from India
seen from Bulgaria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Yemen
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
wait what? cumberbatch is going to be on the simpsons?
Via my Audioboo http://audioboo.fm/bossmew
I was talking about tv series with a friend the other day...
She: So do you like Sherlock as well?
Me: Yeah, I love it!
She: Oh god, you're the same as another friend of mine, she just keeps talking about, ehm, what's his name? Cucumber?
...Cucumber?
It’s pretty [bad] when a story written over 120 years ago has better gender politics than its modern reimagining. With BBC’s Sherlock, this is exactly what happened. The most recent episode, A Scandal in Belgravia puts a modern spin on the Holmes story A Scandal in Bohemia, and manages to engage in a horrifying mess of feminism-fail by the end.
Irene Adler: how to butcher a brilliant woman character « Another angry woman (Spoilers)
Stavvers expresses the same issues I have with Sherlock 2.1* -- 80 minutes of breezily enjoyable, followed by 9:30 of "oh, um, no ... that can't be right" and 30 seconds of "are you fucking kidding me?"
*watched via British vpn on BBC iplayer. Which is not piracy, I think, it's ... impersonating a British person? Illegal immigration?
