It was Proudhon’s belief that homosexuality…. was hardly practiced by the laboring classes. Its adepts were, rather, according to him, ‘the refined, the artists, people of letters, magistrates, priests.’ Why? Because workers were not advanced enough in the cult of the ideal,’ by the pursuit of 'the beautiful and the good.’ What struck him about the mores of antiquity was that it was only 'great poets who came to celebrate this monstrous passion, a privilege, in their words, of gods and heroes.’ […] - Returning to the origins of Greek love, Proudhon suggests, and he’s right, that homosexuality existed in Greece long before Socrates…. At the origins of humanity an 'erotic pantheism’ reigned, which Charles Fourier, to whom Proudhon owed so much, called omnigamy and which Proudhon evokes in these terms: - 'This supreme love, which brought order to chaos and which animates all beings, does not need the human form to sense pleasure. For it, the kingdoms, the genera, the species, the sexes, all is a jumble…. Caeneus changed from a girl into a boy; Hermaphrodite, at once male and female; Proteus, with his thousand metamorphoses…. Theocritus goes further: in a lament for the death of Adonis, he claims that the boar who killed him with one stroke of the tusk was only culpable for clumsiness. The poor animal wanted to give a kiss to this handsome young man: in the transports of his passion he tore him apart!’
Daniel Guerin, “Proudhon’s Repressed Sexuality“















