Establishing Governance in Collective Impact
Submitted by Lauren Walker, Membership & Collective Impact Intern
On March 31, FSG and the Collective Impact Forum held a webinar titled âHow to Embed Clear Roles and Responsibilities across Your Collective Impact Governanceâ. The hosts of the webinar, Ebele Anidi and Jennifer Splansky Juster, explained in detail some of the roles that are common in collective impact initiatives, some of the challenges that come along with establishing governance, misconceptions surrounding the role of the backbone organization, and suggested ways for âenhancing coordinationâ and effectively undertaking the work of the given initiative.
The graphic above demonstrates the relationship between an initiativeâs Steering Committee, Backbone Organization, and additional Working Groups. Working Groups are described as a tool that enables people to âcome together in smaller subsetsâ and âwork on specific priority topicsâ. These smaller groups enable more people to participate and engage in the collective impact work. Backbone organizations guide and facilitate both the Steering Committee and the different working groups. All three entities are essential to âmoving the work forwardâ. The arrows in this graphic represent how communication flows across the infrastructure of the collective.
The hosts provide the following tips for âeffectively managingâ the initiative and itâs infrastructure:
Establishing âclear, collectively established expectations of roles held by different organizations and individualsâ
Establishing working norms
Paying attention to effective communication (ie. what are the best practices for communication?)
Recurring engagement in group reflection as a way to nurture trust and build respect (ie. are we living up to the expectations that were initially established?)
There are also common misconceptions regarding the role of the backbone organization that the hosts address:
The backbone organization sets the agenda. The host uses the analogy of a quarterback on a football team in describing how the backbone organization should function. The role of the quarterback is integral to the success of the team, but they are not the one designing the plays. Rather, it is the quarterbackâs job to understand the playbook and make sure that the team âadvances down the fieldâ.
The backbone organization is the only entity that is responsible for driving the solutions. In reality, the backbone organization should be in a position that provides support to all other aspects of the collective.
The backbone organization receives all the funding. The host makes the point that âtransparency regarding funding is criticalâ, and that the backbone organization Should function to mobilize resources and help other partners understand how funding should be allocated and managed.
The backbone organization is self-appointed rather than selected by the community. The backbone organization is chosen through a specific process that can differ based on the community/initiative. The DC Collaborative was identified by DCPS Arts and the DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities, received a multitude of Support Letters from members of the community of practice, and went through a screening process for the Kennedy Centerâs Ensuring the Arts for Any Given Child initiative.
The hosts continue the webinar by listing â8 principles of practiceâ, which are shown in the image above. Among the 8 principles that are listed, they explain the following principles in more depth:
Priority placed on equity. This approach to equity should be put into practice both internally and externally.
Inclusion of community members and centering of community voices. This is a necessary step in making sure that it is truly the âcommunityâ that makes up the collective initiative. The hosts describe this process as âembedding community ownership in the fabric of your initiative.â
Building a culture that fosters relationships, trust, and respect. This requires the redefinition of power dynamics, and establishing new trust that might not have existed before.
Customization for local context. This involves understanding that there is no âone-size-fits-allâ approach or solution.
Along with going over governance strategies for our work with AGC DC, we would like to take this opportunity/time to conduct a pulse check. Are we living up to our stated values? What are some accountability measures that could be utilized to make sure that we are staying on track with our work? What are some aspects from this webinar that can be applied to our present and future work? What are some terms/roles that could benefit from clarity?
As a part of additional resources, FSG provides a graphic describing 21 ways of facilitating group reflection. The second resource comes from TRG (Training Resources Group), and their decision-making gradient. Another decision-making protocol is the âStoplight Approachâ. The steps of decision-making are correlated to the color of stoplights:Â
Green means that everyone is on the same page regarding a decision
Yellow means that we can move forward while still refining certain aspects
Red means that not everyone is on board, and that the decision should be returned to a full group discussion.
Team Decision Making: The Gradients of Agreement
Facilitating Intentional Group Learning