why do you call dany deadpan? do you not like emilia or? (sorry it's just that dany is my fav and, while i don't think she's perfect, i get a bit defensive of her since so many people seem to hate her [and then project their hate onto emilia])
Well I mean the Dany of the show is written like a completely inconsistent mess who was infantilized to the nth degree this season. So when you say “I don’t think she’s perfect” or “she’s my fav” it’s hard for me to tell if you’re talking about the show or the books. I rather like the Dany of the books, and wrote about GoT’s disservice to her character on a few (#3) occasions (parts 2 & 3). I totally agree that she gets an unfair amount of shit in the ASOIAF fandom.
But if you mean the Dany of the show…I’m sorry to say I have no clue what it is you like about her:
…Daenerys Targaryen’s characterization was entirely absent. The willingness to compromise, the pragmatism, the utilitarianism, the high amounts of compassion…just totally absent. This was only made far worse by the fact that the situation [on the show] was so simplistic. Deadpan did not have to consider murdering child-hostages to whom she had grown close. She didn’t have to contend with the Astapori refugee crisis, or the bloody flux showing up at her doorstep. She didn’t have to deal with the temptation of the Dornish alliance. There was no army marching to squash Meereen, and the enemies within her walls were, frankly, clear-cut.
Yet how she navigated through this dumbed-down plotline was mystifying. She looked like an erratic idiot, literally going from one extreme stance to the opposite within a single episode. And this happened more than once. Deadpan also was a completely ineffective leader; the Strawmen hated her no matter what, and slavery still clearly existed 20 feet from her city thanks to a minimum wage loophole. For the character who is the face of “female empowerment” in television, we really can’t believe how people miss that her scripting is ridiculously infantilizing. Frankly, it’s rather offensive that anyone considers this character “feminist.”
Like, how is she” badass”? Because she kills people and says everything in a tone of absolute, pig-headed certainty? Unless there’s a man there to talk her out of it. Or is it because she makes the empowering realization that she, the empowered ruler, will let the Strawmen kill her, empowerdly? Nevermind that she was a goddamn damsel in distress for the entire scene, only to be spirited off to another location where she then…wait for it…found herself in need of rescue once more.
We really hate Deadpan. She’s a major asshole, and we can’t for the life of us figure out why the audience has gravitated towards her. Or like…how anyone in-verse would follow her too? She clearly can’t form a coherent strategy, even in the short-term. And the characters who actually could give her valuable feedback just end up looking daft for their stanning of her. (x)
As for why we call her “Deadpan,” whoever is her director somehow mistook lacking the ability to emote with “regalness” or “empowerment.” She delivers every line in monotone and shows an expression on her face maybe once in every 12 scenes.
I don’t think this is the best reflection of who Emilia Clarke is as an actor, just like we all know Padme-wooden-Amidala is not all that Natalie Portman is capable of. Ditto for Keisha Castle-Hughes and her “I smell poo” face of this seaosn.
Plus Deadpan’s scripting is really not doing Clarke any favors either. But go listen to that “I’m going to break the wheel” speech and tell me with a straight face that this moniker is inappropriate.
It actually makes me miss the good ol’ days: